Introduction of full body image scanners at the airports: a delicate balance of protecting privacy and ensuring national security

Abstract

There has been so much public uproar over the use of the full body image scanners because of alleged invasion of privacy. This study uses primary data collected over 2 days (Thanksgiving Eve and Thanksgiving Day 2010) at the Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport to examine the perception of the travelling public about the new airport screening procedures. Findings suggest that majority of air travelers are worried about terrorism when they travel; they also considered their privacy would be invaded by the enhanced pat down procedures and the new full body image scanners; travelers would support profiling even if it would invade their privacy while investigating acts of terrorism and majority also supported the use of one’s religion if profiling is done at the airports. The study recommended more rigorous educational campaign by TSA to address the privacy and health risk concerns of the new machines. Future research studies in view of the findings included interviewing TSA and Homeland Security officials and also studying airport security systems in Israel and other European countries.