Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing the impact of workers’ remittances on household consumption in Latin American and Caribbean Countries

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing remittance flows to developing countries continue to stimulate analytical research. We apply a model, based on the “permanent income hypothesis”, to estimate the impact of remittances on consumption in eleven Latin American and Caribbean countries for the period of 2003–2013. The independent variables are: (a) real per capita national income (exclusive of remittances), the measure of “permanent income”, (b) remittances, the measure of “transitory income”, and (c) real interest rate, the indicator of intertemporal consumption substitution. The coefficient of remittances measures the consumption-augmentation and saving effects, while the correlation between remittances and per capita income indicates the consumption-smoothing effects. The results, based on the panel data methodology, indicate: (a) both permanent income and transitory income positively impact consumption, (b) consumption responds higher to permanent income than to transitory income, (c) transitory income has augmenting, stabilizing and countercyclical effects on consumption, and (d) the significant interest rate indicates the ability of recipients to make intertemporal consumption substitution. Evidence of significant “country effect” attests to heterogeneity among countries. Strategies to stabilize remittance flows and to leverage them for financial, economic and social development should be important policy considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Migrant remittances are defined as the sum of workers’ remittances, compensation of employees, and migrants’ transfers. Workers’ remittances, as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the Balance of Payments Manual, 6th edition (IMF 2010), are current private transfers from migrant workers who are considered residents of the host country to recipients in the workers’ country of origin.

  2. The Multilateral Investment Fund (2006) also lists the following potential impact of remittances on the regional economy of Latin America and Caribbean; (i) insurance investments, (ii) banking investments, (iii) housing investments, (iv) educational investments, (v) microfinance institution loans, (vi) direct payments, and (vii) agriculture credits.

  3. They also sent less money per transfer as noted by the Inter-American Development Bank (2009). Remittances from Spain showed average transaction value that were 6% lower than 2008.

  4. The PIH postulates the following: (i) non-correlation between the transitory and permanent component of income, (ii) non-correlation between transitory consumption and permanent consumption, (iii) non-correlation between transitory consumption and transitory income.

  5. There are several factors that affect the amount of remittance flows: (i) economic conditions in migrant destination countries (host countries), (ii) migrant population and migrant unemployment rate in host countries, (iii) the average wage rate for migrant workers in host countries, (iv) the level of family needs in recipient countries, (v) the economic conditions in recipient countries which affect needs and possibility for out migration, and (vi) remittance transfer costs.

  6. Goldberg and Levi (2008) note that costs can be very high as we found in out from existing studies ranging from 10% to 12% + depending on the amount transferred and the transfer agent. The Inter-American Development Bank (2009), dealing with remittances from the US to Latin America showed that the cost of remitting funds had dropped sharply to US$16.32 for a US$200 transfer in the summer of 2002, just over half of what it was three years earlier.

  7. Wald test and F test. If the intercepts are equal for all countries, then there are no fixed effect, that is no individual heterogeneity to be captured by these effects. We can test for the equality of all tests using the Wald Test. If the Null Hypothesis of equal intercepts is rejected, there are fixed effects that is individual heterogeneity can be captured by these effects.

References

  • Acosta P, Fajnzylber P, Humberto-Lopez J (2008) Remittances and household behavior: evidence for Latin America. In: Fajnzylber P, Humberto-Lopez J (eds) Remittances and development. World Bank

  • Adams R (2006), Remittances, Household Expenditure and Investment in Guatemala. Policy Research Working Paper 3532. World Bank, Washington. DC

  • Adams R, Page J (2005) Do International migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries? World Dev 33:1645–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelman I, Taylor JE (1992) Is structural adjustment with a human face possible? J Dev Stud 26:387–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal R, Demirguc-Kunt M-P (2006) Do workers’ remittances promote financial development? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper:3957

  • Anzoategui D, Demirguc-Kunt A (2011) Remittances and financial inclusion evidence from El Salvador, policy research working paper, #5839. The World Bank

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balli F, Rana F (2015) Determinant of risk sharing through remittances. J Bank Financ 55:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balli F, Basher SA, Louis RJ (2013) Risk sharing in the Middle East and North Africa. Econ Transit 21(1):135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi B (2002) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

  • Barajas A, Chami R, Fullenkamp C, Gapen M, Montiel P (2009) Do workers’ remittances promote economic growth? IMF Working Paper, (WP/09/153, July)

  • Barajas A, Chami R, Fullenkamp C, Garg A (2010), The global financial crisis and workers’ remittances to Africa: what is the damage? IMF Working Paper, WP/10/24

  • Bond S (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Port Econ J 1:141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Advances in econometrics, vol 15. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin W, Soskice D (2005) Macroeconomics: imperfections, institutions and policies. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter-Hill R., Griffiths W E, Guay C L (2011) Principles of Ecoenometrics, Fourth Edition, J Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Chami R, Fullenkamp C, Jahjah S (2005) Are immigrant remittance flows a source of capital for development? IMF Staff Paper 52(1):55–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2011) Report on remittance transfers July 20th

  • Doenges RC (1966) Transitory income size and saving. South Econ J 33(2):258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and Caribbean (2014) Trends and risks of the consumption in Latin American and the Caribbean, (http://www.cepal.org)

  • Ekanayake EM, Mihalis H (2008) Do remittances and foreign direct investment promote growth? Evidence from developing countries. Journal of International Business and Economics, Jan-1

  • Faini R (2002) Development, Trade, and Migration, Revue d’ Economie et du Developpement. Proceedings from the ABCDE Europe Conference, 1-2, pp. 85–116

  • Fajnzylber P, Humberto-Lopez J (2008) Remittance and development: lessons from Latin America, IBRD (World Bank)

  • Friedman M (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriela-Mundaca B (2009) Remittances, financial market development, and economic growth: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Dev Econ 13(2):288–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2008.00487.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Economic Prospects (2015) Can remittances help promote consumption stability? World Bank; Washington, DC

  • Goldberg M, Levi M (2008) “The impact of remittances on economic growth” Mastercard worldwide,

  • Gonzalez ED (2009) The impact of remittances on macroeconomic stability: the cases of Mexico and Central America. CEPAL Rev 2009(98):83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorian D A, Kryshko M (2017) “Deposit insurance, remittances, and dollarization: survey-based evidence from a top remittance-Reveiving country” IMF working Paper (WP/17/132)

  • Gujarati D, Porter DC (2009) Basic Econometrics,5th edition. McGraw Hill

  • Hall RE (1978) Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence. J Polit Econ 86:971–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RE, Mishkin FS (1982) The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: estimates from panel data on households. Economica 50(2)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1998) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F (1982) The permanent income hypothesis: estimation and testing by instrumental variables. J Polit Econ 90:895–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes JM (1974) A test of the permanent-income hypothesis: comment. J Polit Econ 82:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Development Bank (2009) Remittances to LAC in 2009: the impact of global recession Washington DC

  • International Debt Statistics (2014) World Bank

  • International Financial Statistics Yearbook (2012) IMF Washington DC

  • International Financial Statistics Yearbook (2015) International Monetary Fund

  • International Financial Statistics Yearbook (2016) IMF Washington DC

  • International Monetary Fund (2009) The implications of the global financial crisis for low-income countries- an update, Washington DC, September 28

  • International Monetary Fund (2010) Balance of Payments Manual, 6th edition

  • Kmenta J (1986) Elements of econometrics, 2nd ed. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinin M (1961) Windfall income and consumption- additional evidence American Economic Review,

  • Kreuger D, Perri F (2008) How does household consumption respond to income shocks? NBER,

  • Laumas PS (1969) A test of the permanent income hypothesis. J Polit Econ 77:857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1976) Economic Policy Evaluation: A Critique. In The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, ed by K. Brunner and A. H. Meltzer, North- Holland, Amesterdam

  • Lueth E, Ruiz-Arranz M (2006) A gravity model of workers’ remittances. IMF Working Paper International Monetary Fund

  • Migration and Development Brief # 24 (2015), World Bank

  • Migration and Remittances Factbook (2011) Second edition. World Bank

  • Mishra P (2007) Emigration and wages in source countries: evidence from Mexico. J Dev Econ 82(1):180–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F (1976) Life-cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations. Am Econ Rev 76(3):297–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Multilateral Investment Fund (2006) The potential impact of Remittances on the Regional Economy of LAC.April

  • Neagu I. C, Schiff M (2009) Remittance stability, cyclicality and stabilizing impact in developing countries. Policy research working paper. The World Bank

  • OECD (2006) International Migration Remittances and their Role in Development International Migration Outlook

  • Ratha D (2007). Leverage remittances for development. Migration Policy Institute Policy Brief

  • Ratha D, De S, Devisevic E. (2015) “Migration and Development Brief 24”. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Ratha D, Mohapatra S, Silwal A (2011) “Migration and Development Brief 17”. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Spatafora N (2005) Two Current Issues Facing Developing Countries In world economic outlook: A survey by the staff of the International Monetary Fund. Chapter Two

  • UNCTAD (2010) Maximizing the development impact of remittances United Nations

  • UNCTAD (2011) Impact of remittances on poverty in developing countries, United Nations

  • United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals, New York

  • Willassen Y (1978) An analysis of the effect of transitory income on consumption. Scand J Econ 80(3):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006a) Economic implications of remittances and migration, Global Economic Prospects

  • World Bank (2006b) International migration remittances and their role in development. International Migration Outlook, 139–161

  • Yang D (2004) “International Migration, Human Capital and Entrprenuership” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 3578

  • Yang D (2006) Coping with Disaster: The Impact of Hurricanes on International Financial Flows, 1970–2001 (Mimeo, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)

  • Yang D, Choi H (2007) Are remittances insurance? Evidence from rainfall shocks in the Philippines. World Bank Econ Rev 21(2):219–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments/suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper. All errors are mine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harri Ramcharran.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Important ratios (2003–2013)
Table 4 Outlook for remittance flows to developing countries, 2008–2015
Table 5 Statistical properties of data (2003–2013)
Table 6 Group Unit Root Test: Sample: 1121: Series: LCON, LINT, LREMIT, LPCGNI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramcharran, H. Analyzing the impact of workers’ remittances on household consumption in Latin American and Caribbean Countries. J Econ Finan 44, 59–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-9468-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-9468-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation