Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Okun’s law: evidence of 13 selected developed countries

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper re-examines the validity of Okun’s Law for 13 selected developed countries over 1970–2013. λ maxand λ trace tests reveal cointegrating relationship between unemployment rate and real GDP growth in all countries except Germany. However, dynamic OLS estimates portray a somewhat different picture. The estimates of bivariate error-correction model (ECM) unveil that Okun’s Law is quite valid only for the USA and South Korea. At the same time, evidence is relatively weaker for Canada, Finland, France, Japan, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, UK and Australia. However, it is invalid for Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1969). “Fitting autoregression for prediction”. Ann Inst Stat Math, 21, 243–247.

  • Altig D, Fitzgerald T, Rupert P (1997) “Okun’s law revisited: should we worry about low employment?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary, 1-4. Retrieved from http://proxy1.libraray.in.edu.hk:2197/docview/2336084458?accountid=12107

  • Artha IKDS, Haan JD (2011) Market flexibility and the impact of the financial crisis. Kyklos 64:213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attfield CLF, Silverstone B (1997) Okun’s coefficient: a comment. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(2):326–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole AS, Fatai BO (2013) Empirical test of okun’s law in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories 3:337–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, K. (2010). “Time variation in Okun’s Law: A Canada and U.S. comparison”, Bank of Canada Working Paper No. 2010–7, Bank of Canada, www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/wp10-7.pdf

  • Burgen E, Meyer B, Tasci M (2012) An elusive relation between unemployment and GDP growth: okun’s law. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Retrieved from http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/trends/2012/0412/011abmar.cfm

  • Cevik EI, Dibooglu S, Barisik S (2013) Asymmetry in the unemployment-output relationship over the business cycle: evidence from transition economies. Comp Econ Stud 55:557–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin G (2011) Okun’s law revisited. Economic and Labor Market Review 5(2):104–132 Retrieved from http://proxy1.libraray.in.edu.hk:2197/docview/857921570?accountid=12107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton J, Madsen R (2009) Regional implications of the 2001 recession. Ann Reg Sci 43:491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton J, Madsen R (2012) US state and regional economic impact of the 2008/2009 recession. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 42:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary, and Hobijn, B. (2010). “Okun’s Law and the unemployment surprise of 2009″, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Economic Letter, No. 2010–7, www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-07.html

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 2:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irfan, L., Muhammad, S., and Jalil, M. (2012). “Test of okun’s law in some Asian countries: cointegration approach”. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562602

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1992) Testing structural hypothesis in multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the VIP for U.K. J Econ 53:211–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 51:169–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Karfakis C, Katralidis C, Tsanana E (2014) Does output predict unemployment? A look at okun’s law in Greece. Int Labour Rev 153:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitov I, Kitov O (2012) Modeling unemployment and employment in advanced economics: okun’s law with a structural break. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields 3(1):26–41 Retrieved from http://proxy1.libraray.in.edu.hk:2197/docview/1038147682?accountid=12107

    Google Scholar 

  • Knotek, Edward S. II (2007). “How useful is Okun’s Law?”. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, 73–103, www.kc.frb.org/publicat/econrev/PDF/4q07Knotek.pdf

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P, Trenkler C (2001) Maximum Eigen value versus trace tests for the cointegrating rank of a VAR process. Econometrics Journal 4:287–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely C (2010) Okun’s law: output and unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Retrieved from http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/10/ES1004.pdf

  • Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 64:813–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1962). “Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance”. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. 89–104.

  • Owyang M, Sekhposyan T (2012) Okun’s law over the business cycle: was the recession really that different? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Retrieved from http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/12/09/399-418Owyang_rev.pdf

  • Phillips PCB (1986) Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 33:311–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies 57:99–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plosser CI, Schwert GW (1979) Potential GNP: its measurement and significance: a dissenting opinion. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 10(1):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1997) “What is labor market flexibility: what is it good for?”. Proceedings of the British Academy 97:189–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer L, Stiassny A (2002) An analysis on the structural stability of okun’s law- a cross country study. Appl Econ 14(34):1775–1787

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M, Warsh AK (2015) “The fed has hurt business investment”. Wall Street J, Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fed-has-hurt-business-investment-1445899627

  • Stock JH, Watson M (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Y, Chen M (2012) “Okun’s law: a meaningful guide for monetary policy?”, federal reserve bank of St. Louis Retrieved from http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/12/ES_2012-06-08.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matiur Rahman.

Appendix

Appendix

(Derivation of Growth Rate Form of Okun’s Law).

In its original form, Okun’s Law is:

$$ \uptheta \left(\mathrm{U}*-\mathrm{U}\right)=\left(\mathrm{Y}\hbox{--} \mathrm{Y}*\right)/\mathrm{Y}* $$
(4)

Where, U is the unemployment rate, Y is real GDP, U* is natural rate of unemployment, Y* is potential real GDP and θ is the Okun’s coefficient.

To derive the growth rate revision, equation (4) is expanded as follows:

$$ \theta U*-\theta U=\mathrm{Y}/\mathrm{Y}*-\mathrm{Y}*/\mathrm{Y}* $$
(5)

Totally differentiating equation (5) and assuming Y* constant at full employment, with respect to all variables,

$$ \theta dU*-\theta dU=\mathrm{dY}/\mathrm{Y}*-\mathrm{dY}*/\mathrm{Y}* $$
(6)

For simplification, if the natural rate of unemployment is unchanged, dU* = 0. Now, rearranging the terms,

$$ \mathrm{dY}/\mathrm{Y}*=-\theta dU+\mathrm{dY}*/\mathrm{Y}* $$
(7)

Usually, Y will be close to Y* in the long run – within a few percent, at least. Therefore, dY/Y* can be approximated by dY/Y, the growth rate of GDP. Finally, in growth rate version,

$$ \mathrm{dY}/\mathrm{Y}=-\theta dU+\mathrm{dY}*/\mathrm{Y}* $$
(8)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, M., Mustafa, M. Okun’s law: evidence of 13 selected developed countries. J Econ Finan 41, 297–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-015-9351-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-015-9351-5

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation