Abstract
The characteristics of flat-panel detectors (FPD) are degraded by exposure to radiation. Degradation in a FPD progresses locally and has a nonlinear relationship to the radiation dose. In order to manage FPD systems properly, one must perform quality control (QC) such as evaluation of image degradation. However, no evaluation method for degradation has been established. In this paper, we first review the structure and degradation mechanism of FPDs, and then we propose a daily QC system for FPDs. To evaluate the degradation of FPDs, we investigated the number of defective pixels and lines, as well as the offset level of the pixel output. Furthermore, we developed daily QC software for FPD that can evaluate the image quality and is operationally simple. In the experiments, an indirect-conversion type FPD was evaluated by our proposed system. The offset level of FPD increased exponentially with X-ray exposure; no trends were seen for the number of defective pixels and defective lines. The required time for the evaluation of an FPD was about 1 min, and no special skills were needed for the analysis. These results indicate that our system may be useful for daily QC of FPDs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rowlands J, Kasap S Amorphous semiconductors usher in digital X-ray imaging. Phys Today. 1997:24–30
Moy JP. Large area X-ray detectors based on amorphous silicon technology. Thin Solid Films. 1999;337:213–21.
Hopkinson GR. Radiation effects on solid state imaging devices. Radiat Phys chem. 1994;43:79–91.
Boudry JM, Antonuk LE. Radiation damage of amorphous silicon photodiode sensors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1994;41:703–7.
Meng X-T, Kang A-G, Li J-H, Zhang H-Y, Yu S, Zheng Y. Effects of electron and gamma-ray irradiation on CMOS analog image sensors. Microelectron Reliab. 2003;43:1151–5.
Boudry JM, Antonuk LE. Radiation damage of amorphous silicon, thin-film, field-effect transistors. Med Phys. 1996;23:743–54.
Siewerdsen JH, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Yorkston J, Huang W, CunninghamSiewerdsen IA. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. Med Phys. 1998;25:614–28.
Samei E, Flynn MJ. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys. 2003;30:608–22.
Samei E. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Med Phys. 2003;30:1747–57.
Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R, Possin GE, Giambattista BW, Huang ZS, Liu J, et al. Performance of a 41×41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications. Med Phys. 2003;30:2715–26.
Arthur SD, David SW. Handbook of imaging materials. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001. p. 329–68.
Maragos PA, Schafer RW. Morphological filters-Part I: their set-theoretic analysis and relations to linear shift-invariant filters. IEEE Trans ASSP. 1987;35:1153–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A part of this study was reported at the 65th and 66th general meeting of the JSRT.
About this article
Cite this article
Teramoto, A., Kajihara, T., Suzuki, S. et al. Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors. Radiol Phys Technol 4, 164–172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-011-0117-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-011-0117-2