Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of errors influencing accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurosurgeons sometimes find it difficult to locate tumors precisely during microsurgery, particularly tumors located in the brain parenchyma because of the absence of boundaries in this region. Image-guided neurosurgical techniques conducted with the help of neuronavigation systems have been developed and have gained importance recently. Accuracy is vital during image-guided neurosurgery. We used a phantom to evaluate the errors introduced during navigation. The three errors evaluated were skin-shift, marker-gap, and table-rotation errors. The skin-shift error occurs if the fiducial markers positioned on the scalp move when the head is fixed to a head holder with head pins. The marker-gap error occurs when the marker ball is positioned incorrectly in the marker socket. The table-rotation error occurs when the operating table is rotated for obtaining an intraoperative MR image and then returned to its original position. Our results indicated that skin shift decreased the navigation accuracy by an error of more than 4 mm, and the gap between the marker ball and the socket resulted in a decrease in navigation accuracy by an error of more than 5 mm. The table-rotation error was found to be negligible. The errors can be avoided by ensuring that the fiducial markers are positioned appropriately on the scalp and the marker ball is fitted well in the marker socket. A phantom is useful for evaluating accuracy, particularly for evaluating errors intrinsic to different operating rooms. Periodic quality assurance by use of a phantom in each operating room might aid in maintaining the accuracy of neuronavigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagashima Y, Hirose S, Suzukawa H, Naemura K, Takanobu H, Muragaki Y, et al. Improvement of a navigation system for the neurosurgery in the intraoperative MRI-equipped operating theater. J Jpn Soc Comput Aided Surg. 2003;5:331–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iseki H, Muragaki Y, Nakamura R, Ozawa N, Taniguchi H, Hori T, et al. Intelligent operating theater using intraoperative open MRI. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4:129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muto S, Ando H, Nagashima Y, Uematsu M, Suzukawa H, Nakamura R, et al. Clinical application of the navigation system for the neurosurgery in the intraoperative MRI-equipped operating theater using reflective ball markers. J Jpn Soc Comput Aided Surg. 2004;6:367–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nagashima Y, Hirose S, Suzukawa K, Naemura K, Takanobu H, Muragaki Y, et al. Accuracy evaluation of navigation system during neurosurgery at open MRI theater and improvement of its maneuverability. J Jpn Soc Comput Aided Surg. 2004;6:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brain Lab AG. Clinical user guide rev. 1.0. Vector vision cranial ver. 7.5J. Feldkirchen: Brain Lab AG; 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yohei Watanabe.

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, Y., Fujii, M., Hayashi, Y. et al. Evaluation of errors influencing accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery. Radiol Phys Technol 2, 120–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-009-0053-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-009-0053-6

Keywords

Navigation