Abstract
The East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales represent the first effort to create a developmental assessment tool on the basis of the diverse cultures and values of a range of countries within a world region. The Scales were administered to a representative sample of 7757 children (3869 girls), ranging in age from 36 to 71 months, from Cambodia, China, Mongolia, Timor-Leste, Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu. In all six countries, child development scores increased with age and urban children consistently performed better than rural children. The gap between urban and rural children widened with age in Cambodia. There were significant gender differences in total scores, favouring girls in four countries. Results illustrate commonalities and variations in trajectories of children’s early development across contexts. Reasons for the findings and their implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, W. S. (2011). Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science, 333, 957–978.
Bedford, H. (2014). Measures of child development: A review. London: UCL Institute of Child Health, Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
Brinkman, S., Gregory, T., Harris, J., Hart, B., Blackmore, S., & Janus, M. (2013). Associations between the early development instrument at age 5, and reading and numeracy skills at ages 8, 10 and 12: A prospective linked data study. Child Indicators Research, 6(4), 695–708.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Speilberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross cultural assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc..
Heckman, J. J. (2008). Schools, Skills, and Synapses. Economic Enquiry, 46(3), 289–324.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WERID. Nature, 466, 29.
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.
Inter-American Development Bank (2015) Regional Project on Child Development Indicators (PRIDI).
Janus, M., & Offord, D. R. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 3, 1–22.
Janus, M., Harrison, L. J., Goldfeld, S., Guhn, M., & Brinkman, S. (2016). International research utilizing the early development instrument (EDI) as a measure of early child development: Introduction to the special issue. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35, 1–5.
Kagan, S. L., Castillo, E., Gomez, R. E., & Gowani, S. (2015). Understanding and using early learning standards for young children globally. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 7(2), 53–66.
Kankaras, M., & Moors, G. (2010). Researching measurement equivalence in cross-cultural studies. Psihologija, 43, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1002121K
Louden, W., Chan, L., Elkins, J., & Greaves, D. (2000). Mapping the territory - primary students with learning difficulties: Literacy and numeracy. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10.1037/a0014240, 101(3), 689–704.
McCain, M., & Mustard, J. F. (1999). The Early Years Study-Reversing the Real Brain Drain. In The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research to the Ontario Government (Ed.), (Vol. 2013). Toronto, Ontario: The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research to the Ontario Government.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012a). TIMSS international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K.T. (2012b). The PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris, OECD.
Pisani, L., Borisova, I., & Dowd, A.J. (2015). International development and early learning assessment (IDELA). Save the children technical working paper. Retrieved from http://www.savethechildren.org/atf/cf/%7B9def2ebe-10ae-432c-9bd0-df91d2eba74a%7D/IDELA%20TECHNICAL%20WORKING%20PAPER_V4.PDF.
Pons, F., Lawson, J., Harris, P. L., & De Rosnay, M. (2003). Individual differences in children's emotion understanding: Effects of age and language. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 44(4), 347–353
Rao, N., Engle, P.L. & Sun, J. (2011). Revised constructs and indicators for the East Asia-Pacific early child development scales. Singapore: Asia Pacific Regional Network for Early Childhood.
Rao, N., Sun, J., Ng, M., Becher, Y., Lee, D., Ip, P., & Bacon-Shone, J. (2014). Validation, finalization and adoption of the East Asia-Pacific early child development scales (EAP-ECDS). UNICEF. http://www.arnec.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/EAP-ECDS-Final-Report1.pdf.
Rao, N., Sun, J., & Becher, Y. (2015). Assessing early development and learning across cultures: The East Asia Pacific – Early child development scales. Assessment & Development Matters, 7, 21–25.
Richter, L. M., Daelmans, B., Lombardi, J., Heymann, J., Boo, F. L., Behrman, J. R., ... & Bhutta, Z. A. (2017). Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 103–118.
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological bulletin, 132(1), 98.
Singh, J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597–619.
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.
UN Development Programme (2015). Human development data (1990–2015). http://hdr.undp.org/en/data (Accessed Sept 6 2016).
UNESCO. (2014). EFA global monitoring report. Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all 2013/2014. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2015). EFA Global Monitoring Report. Education for All 2000-2015: Achievements and Challenges. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, UNESCO.
UNICEF (2015). The state of the world’s children 2015: Reimagine the future: Innovation for every child. New York; UNICEF.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 4–69.
Van de Poel, E., O’Donnell, O., & Van Doorslaer, E. (2007). Are urban children really healthier? Evidence from 47 developing countries. Social science & medicine, 65(10), 1986–2003
Verdisco, A., Cueto, S., Thompson, J., &, Neuschmidt, O. (2015). PRIDI regional project of child development indicators. Urgency and possibility results: First initiative to comparative data on child development Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/6849/PRIDI.%20Urgency%20and%20Possibility..pdf?sequence=1.
World Bank. (2016a). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators .
World Bank. (2016b). Measuring child development and early learning. Concept note. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/659701473955877219/pdf/108286-BRI-PUBLIC-ELPIBMeasuringCDvprint.pdf .
Funding
Funding for the validation study of the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales (EAP-ECDS) came from UNICEF, ARNEC and the Open Society Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Hong Kong. Informed consent was obtained from parents of all child participants.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, N., Sun, J., Richards, B. et al. Assessing Diversity in Early Childhood Development in the East Asia-Pacific. Child Ind Res 12, 235–254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9528-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9528-5