Abstract
Sociocultural theory focuses on group processes through time, and argues that group phenomena cannot be reduced to explanation in terms of the mental states or actions of the participating individuals. This makes sociocultural theory particularly useful in the analysis of group creativity and group learning, because both group creativity and group learning emerge over time from the successive contributions of individual members, and they are difficult to reductively explain in terms of the mental states or actions of participating individuals. This paper presents a case study of group creativity, analyzing how a collective creative product emerges over 17 successive encounters of an improvisational theater group. This case study demonstrates the value of sociocultural theory in the study of group processes over time. And yet, it suggests that to fully explain group creativity and group learning, existing sociocultural theory must be extended beyond a narrow focus on process and practice, to focus on three levels of analysis: individual creative acts, interactional dynamics over time, and the emergence of collective group creations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bauman, R., & Sherzer, J. (Eds.). (1974). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Broad, C. D. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. (1995). Socio-cultural-historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of cultural-genetic methodology. In J. V. Wertsch, Rio Pd, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 187–214). New York: Cambridge.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (2007). Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 484–507). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Forman, E. A., Minick, N., & Stone, C. A. (Eds.). (1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York: Cambridge.
Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: the constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44, 77–83.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT.
John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: New York.
Kim, J. (1992). “Downward causation” in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 119–138). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Matusov, E. (1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development, 41, 326–349.
McLaughlin, B. P. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 49–93). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Morgan, C. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams & Norgate. Originally presented as the 1922 Gifford lectures at the University of St. Andrews.
Nercessian, N. J. (2005). Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions. In M. Gorman, R. Tweney, D. Gooding, & A. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 17–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: New York.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development (pp. 265–285). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Academic.
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (1997). Creativity in performance. Greenwich: Ablex.
Sawyer, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical Psychology, 12(4), 447–469.
Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture & Psychology, 8(3), 283–305.
Sawyer, R. K. (2003a). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Sawyer, R. K. (2003b). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport: Greenwood.
Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: New York.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006a). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 187–204). New York: Cambridge.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006b). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford: New York.
Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford.
Sawyer, R. K. (in press). Qualitative methodologies for studying small groups. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. M. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. A. Chinn (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning. London: Taylor & Francis.
Sawyer, R. K., & Berson, S. (2004). Study group discourse: how external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 15(4), 387–412.
Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92.
Sawyer, R. K., Scribner, J. P., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2005). Talking leadership: Conversation analysis and distributed leadership. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 169–185). Greenwich: Information Age.
Scieszka, J., & Smith, L. (1998). Squids will be squids: Fresh morals, beastly fables. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 73–85.
Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology—What is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sims, P. (2011). Little bets: How breakthrough ideas emerge from small discoveries. New York: Free.
Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G. (Eds.). (1990). Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Teller, P. (1992). A contemporary look at emergence. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 139–153). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Valsiner, J. (1991). Building theoretical bridges over a lagoon of everyday events. Human Development, 34, 307–315.
Valsiner, J. (1998a). Dualisms displaced: from crusades to analytic distinctions. Human Development, 41, 350–354.
Valsiner, J. (1998b). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Commentary. Human Development, 36, 168–171.
Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 202–208.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: New York.
Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sawyer, K. Extending Sociocultural Theory to Group Creativity. Vocations and Learning 5, 59–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9066-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9066-5