Skip to main content

Reflections on the Impact of Teresa Amabile on the Development of the Field of Group Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity at Work
  • 877 Accesses

Abstract

Teresa Amabile’s groundbreaking work on the social perspective of creativity provided inspiration to those interested in investigating group influences on creativity. The subsequent empirical and theoretical developments in that field are quite consistent with the componential model of creativity. This chapter highlights these connections and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., & Biederman, P. W. (1997). Organizing genius. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N. R., Erez, M., & Farr, J. L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 305–337. https://doi.org/1754-9426/09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Farh, J., Campbell-Bush, E., Wu, Z., & Wu, X. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. B., & Jayatilaka, B. (2006). Group creativity: The effects of extrinsic, intrinsic, and obligation motivations. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A., Minas, R. K., & Williams, M. L. (2019). Creativity in computer-mediated virtual groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Handbook of group creativity and innovation (pp. 253–269). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., Friedrich, W., et al. (2018). Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S., & Kou, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 734–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korde, R., & Paulus, P. B. (2017). Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, R. C., Gilson, L. L., & Gilson, P. W. (2015). Defining creative ideas: Toward a more nuanced approach. Group and Organization Management, 40(2), 238–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. (1949). Your creative power: How to use imagination. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (Ed.). (1983). Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Compass, 1, 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., & Ortega, A. H. (1999). Group creativity. In R. E. Purser & A. Montuori (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 151–176). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming. Predicting production gains and losses. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Kenworthy, J. (2019). Effective brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Handbook of group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 287–306). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.) (2019). The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., van der Zee, K. I., & Kenworthy, J. (2019). Diversity and group creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Handbook of group creativity and innovation (pp. 33–49). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puccio, G. J., Burnett, C., Acar, S., Yudess, J. A., Holinger, M., & Cabra, J. F. (2018). Creative problem solving in small groups: The effects of creativity training on idea generation, solution creativity, and leadership effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 0, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosing, K., Bledow, R., Frese, M., Baytalskaya, N., Lascano, J. J., & Farr, L. (2018). The temporal pattern of creativity and implementation in teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 798–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (1990). Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. J. (1975). Stimulating creativity. Volume II-Group procedures. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A. (1989). The appropriation of ideas. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 393–423). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. Paulus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paulus, P.B. (2020). Reflections on the Impact of Teresa Amabile on the Development of the Field of Group Creativity. In: Reiter-Palmon, R., Fisher, C.M., Mueller, J.S. (eds) Creativity at Work. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics