Abstract
The paper analyses a form of interprofessional working and learning (IPWL)—the fleeting spatial and temporal constitution of project teams with little prior history of working together—that is an increasing feature of work in the global economy. The paper argues firstly: (i) this form of working and learning is relatively under-researched in professional, vocational and workplace learning (PVWL); and, (ii) the research traditions—Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and Cultural Anthropology/Symbolic Interactionist (CA/SI)—that some researchers in PVWL have drawn on to investigate IPWL do not allow them to capture the cognitive and symbolic complexity of this activity. Secondly, it is possible to reveal the nature of this complexity when the concepts and methods associated with CHAT and CA-SI-based approaches are supplemented with the concepts of ‘inference’, ‘space of reasons’, ‘restructuring and ‘recontextualisation’ (Guile, 2010). The paper demonstrates this claim by reinterpreting a classic study of the aforementioned form of working and learning undertaken by Hall, Stevens and Torolba that drew on concepts and methods from CA and SI (2002).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B., & Hoyrup, S. (Eds.). (2005). Learning, working and living: Mapping the terrain of working life learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bakhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky’s demons. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge Vygotsky reader (pp. 50–70). Cambridge: CUP.
Barley, S., & Kundra, G. (2001). Bringing work back. Organizational Science, 12, 76–95.
Bechky, B. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17, 3–21.
Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Billett, S., Harteis, C., & Eteläpelto, E. (2008). Emerging perspectives of workplace learning. Rotterdam: Sense.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boas, F. (1920). The methods of ethnology. American Anthropologist, 22, 311–321.
Boreham, N., Samurçay, R., & Fischer, M. (Eds.). (2002). Work process knowledge. London: Routledge.
Boud, D., & Soloman, N. (Eds.). (2001). Work-based learning—a new higher education? Buckingham: OU Press.
Bowker, G., & Starr, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brandom, R. (1995). Knowledge and the social articulation of the space of reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, 895–908.
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
D’Andrade, R., & Strauss, C. (1992). Human motives and cultural models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 107–114). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
Edwards, A. (2007). An interesting resemblance: Vygotsky, mead and American pragmatism. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 77–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving inter-professional collaborations: Multi-agency working for children’s wellbeing. London: Routledge.
Ehn, P. (1990). Work-orientated design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
Ekstedt, E., Lundin, R., Soderholm, A., & Wirdenius, H. (1999). Neo-industrial organizing. Renewal by action and knowledge in a project-intensive economy. London: Routledge.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: University of Finland.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ettlinger, N. (2003). Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities, networks, and change in collaborative workplaces. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 879–909.
Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., & Unwin, L. (Eds.). (2002). Working to learn: Making learning visible. London: Kogan Page.
Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H., & Unwin, L. (2006). Improving workplace learning. London: Routledge.
Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2009). Improving working for learning. London: Routledge.
Foot, K. (2002). Pursuing an evolving object: a case study in object formation. Mind, Culture and Activity, 9(2), 132–149.
Gergen, K. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Goodenough, F. (1936). The measurement of mental functions in primitive groups. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 1–11.
Grabher, G. (2002). Cool projects, borng institutions temporary collaboration in social context. (editorial) Special Edition. Regional Studies, 36(3).
Grabher, G. (2004). Learning in projects, remembering in networks?: communality, sociality, and connectivity in project ecologies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), 103–123.
Guile, D. (2010). The learning challenge of the knowledge economy. Rotterdam: Sense.
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torroba, T. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture and Activity, 9(2), 179–210.
Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, P. (2010). Improving mathematics at work. London: Routledge.
Hughes, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2007). Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchins, E., & Nomura, S. (2011). Collaborative construction of multimodal utterances. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.) Multimodality and human activity: Research on human behavior, action, and communication. Cambridge University Press.
Jensen, K., Lahn, L., & Nerland, M. (forthcoming). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense.
Jonsen, A., & Toulmin, S. (1988). Theory and practice. In A. Jonsen & S. Toulmin (Eds.), The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kellogg, K., Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17, 22–44.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kyng, M. (Ed.). (2003). Design at work. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Livingstone, D., Mirchandani, K., & Sawchuk, P. (Eds.). (2008). The future of lifelong learning and work. Rotterdam: Sense.
Ludvigsen, S., Konkola, R., & Tuomi-Gröhn, T. T. (2007). Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 211–228.
Luff, C., & Heath, J. (2001). Workplace studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lundlin, R., & Hartman, F. (Eds.). (2000). Projects as business constituents and guiding motives. Boston: Dortrecht.
McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world (2nd ed.). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Midler, C. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: the Renault case. Scandavian Journal of Management., 11(4), 263–275.
Minick, N. (1985). L. S. Vygotsky and Soviet activity theory: New perspectives on the relationship between mind and society. San Diego: San Diego University Press.
Nardi, B. (Ed.) (1996). Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nardi, B. (2007). Placeless organisations: collaborating for transformation. Mind Culture and Activity, 14(1&2), 5–22.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. The Journal of Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242.
Nijof, W., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2007). The learning potential of the workplace. Rotterdam: Sense.
Rainbird, H., Fuller, A., & Munro, A. (Eds.). (2004). Workplace learning in context. London: Routledge.
Redding, P. (2007). Analytical philosophy and the return of Hegelian thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Starr, S. L. (1998). Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. In Y. Engeström & D. Middelton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starr, S., & Strauss, A. (1998). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1-2), 3–10.
Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Strauss, A., Fagerhaulgh, S., Suczek, N., & Weiner, C. (1997). Social organisation of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualising transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (1988). On the social nature of human cognition: an analysis of the shared intellectual roots of George Herbert Mead and Lev Vygotsky. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 18(1), 117–136.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1 Problems of General Psychology (Including the Volume Thinking and Speech). R. W. Reiber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.). (trans: Minick, N.). New York: Plenum Press.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments. The comments helped him to strengthen the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guile, D. Interprofessional Activity in the ‘Space of Reasons’: Thinking, Communicating and Acting. Vocations and Learning 4, 93–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9052-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9052-y