Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Different Milk Samples Preservation Procedures for Bacteriologic Examination

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 September 2008

Abstract

The control of pathogenic bacteria present in foods, as well as scientific data concerning their behavior, are closely linked to analytical methods used and the way they are implemented. To assess the capacity of the laboratories to conduct correctly microbiological analyses, national and international proficiency testing schemes are organized. To set up these inter-laboratory studies (ILS), it is necessary to prepare artificially contaminated samples, which contamination level is sufficiently stable regarding their transportation conditions to the participating laboratories. In this context, we tested several procedures to maintain the concentration of Listeria monocytogenes and coagulase-positive staphylococci in milk samples: freezing temperature and addition of bacteriostatic agents at refrigeration temperatures, such as nystatin, boric acid, sodium azide, the lactoperoxidase system, or a boric acid mixture. Through this study we selected preservation procedures, which could be used to stabilize the contamination level of artificially contaminated milk samples during transportation without preventing the growth of the target bacteria during the analysis and after the initial dilution step. Boric acid mixture and boric acid were found to be effective in stabilizing the contamination level of Staphylococcus aureus in milk samples, whereas freezing, a boric acid mixture, and boric acid were suitable for milk samples containing L. monocytogenes, depending on the samples’ contamination rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1996) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes, Part 1. Detection Method. International Standard ISO 11290-1. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1998) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes, part 2. Enumeration method. International standard ISO 11290-2. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1999) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species) Part 2: Technique using rabbit plasma fibrinogen agar. International Standard ISO 6888-2. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2003) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms—Colony-count technique at 30°C. International Standard ISO 4833. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2005) Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union L 338:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2007) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—General requirements and guidance for microbiological examinations. European and International Standard EN ISO 7218. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcina Y, Zorraquino MA, Pedauye J, Ros G, Rincòn F (1987) Azidiol as a preservative for milk samples. Ann Vet 3:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcìa-Graells C, Van Opstal I, Vanmuysen SCM, Michiels CW (2003) The lactoperoxidase system increases efficacy of high-pressure inactivation of foodborne bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 81:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeschen W, Reichmuth J, Tolle A, Zeider H (1969) Die Konservierung von Milchproben zur bakteriologischen, zytologischen und hemmstoffbiologischen Untersuchung. Milchwissenschaft 24:729–734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Yousef A (1999) Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes important to food processors. In: Ryser ET, Marth EH (eds) Listeria, listeriosis and food safety. M. Dekker, New York, NY, pp 131–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettipher GL, Rodrigues UM (1982) A bacteriostatic mixture for milk samples and its effect on bacteriological, cytological and chemical compositional analysis. Appl Bacteriol 52:259–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp M, Münch S (1984) Neuentwicklung von flüssigen Konservierungsmitteln für Milchproben. Deutsche Molkerei Zeitung 39:1264–1272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was part of the activities of Afssa as Community Reference Laboratories for Listeria monocytogenes and coagulase-positive staphylococci, funded by the European Commission/DG SANCO. The authors would like to thank P. Sanders, R. Fuselier, and M. Laurentie (Afssa Fougères) for their helpful advices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Gnanou Besse.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-008-9044-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gnanou Besse, N., Cauquil, A., Vignaud, ML. et al. Comparative Study of Different Milk Samples Preservation Procedures for Bacteriologic Examination. Food Anal. Methods 1, 36–42 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-007-9009-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-007-9009-9

Keywords

Navigation