Skip to main content
Log in

Change in Goal Ratings as a Mediating Variable Between Self-efficacy and Physical Activity in Older Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined the associations between exercise self-efficacy, goals, and physical activity over time.

Purpose

This study examines whether self-selected goals mediate the changes in exercise self-efficacy on physical activity over 12 months.

Methods

Data are derived from 313 older men participating in the Veterans LIFE Study.

Results

Changes in exercise self-efficacy were significantly associated with changes in physical activity both directly (βs = 0.25 and 0.24, p < 0.05) and indirectly (βs = 0.24 and 0.30, p < 0.05) through changes in health-related and walking goal ratings (βs = 0.19 and 0.20, p < 0.05). Both types of goal setting continued to partially mediate the relationship between exercise self-efficacy and physical activity when covariates were added to the models.

Conclusion

This study extends the application of social cognitive and goal-setting theories to physical activity by showing that goals partially mediate the relationship between exercise self-efficacy and physical activity over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haskell WL, Lee I, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendations for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116(9): 1081–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McAuley E, Blissmer B. Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exer Sport Sci Rev. 2000; 28(2): 85–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrod R, Marshall J, Jones F. Self-efficacy measurement and goal attainment after pulmonary rehabilitation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008; 3(4): 791–796.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol. 2002; 57(9): 705–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS. Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 19(2): 81–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Locke EA, Shaw KN, Saari LM, Latham GP. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychol Bull. 1981; 90(1): 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Purposes and mechanisms of goal planning in rehabilitation: the need for a critical distinction. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(12): 741–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morey MC, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, et al. The Veterans Learning to Improve Fitness and Function in Elders Study: A randomized trial of primary care-based physical activity counseling for older men. J Amer Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57(7): 1166–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages of changes in the modification of problem behaviors. Prog Behav Modif. 1992; 28: 183–218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bearon LB, Crowley GM, Chandler J, Robbins MS, Studenski S. Personal functional goals: A new approach to assessing patient-centered outcomes. J Appl Gerontol. 2000; 19(3): 326–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993; 16(1): 103–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2001; 33(7): 1126–1141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morey MC, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, et al. Project LIFE–Learning to Improve Fitness and Function in Elders: methods, design, and baseline characteristics of randomized trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45(1): 31–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fillenbaum G. Multidimensional functional assessment of older adults. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993: 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107: 238–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Folta SC, Lichtenstein AH, Seguin RA, Goldberg JP, Kuder JF, Nelson ME. The Strong Women–Healthy Hearts Program: Reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural sedentary, overweight, and obese midlife and older women. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(7): 1271–1277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rejeski WJ, King AC, Katula JA, et al. Physical activity in prefrail older adults: Confidence and satisfaction related to physical function. J Gerontol B: Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008; 63(1): 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Estabrooks PA, Nelson CC, Xu S, et al. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005; 31(3): 391–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richman WL, Kiesler S, Weisband S, Drasgow F. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J Appl Psychol. 1999; 84(5): 754–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Veterans Affairs Research and Development (no. E3386R), Morey PI, and the National Institutes of Health (AG028716), Morey Co-PI. We wish to also acknowledge the contributions of the other Project Life authors: Carl Pieper, Patricia Cowper, and Matthew Peterson; as well as the dedication of our research staff members: Megan Pearson, Jennifer Chapman, Teresa Howard, and Dee Carbuccia; and participating primary care and geriatric providers and Veterans LIFE Study participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine S. Hall Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, K.S., Crowley, G.M., McConnell, E.S. et al. Change in Goal Ratings as a Mediating Variable Between Self-efficacy and Physical Activity in Older Men. ann. behav. med. 39, 267–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9177-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9177-5

Keywords

Navigation