Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Review of Physical Activity Measures Used Among US Latinos: Guidelines for Developing Culturally Appropriate Measures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

As the US population continues to grow and diversify, there is a need for progressive physical activity measurement and cross-cultural research. Studies suggest that US Latinos are among the most sedentary of ethnic groups compared to others; however, study findings may be biased given that some measures may not be culturally sensitive for assessing behaviors that are not characterized as leisure time physical activity.

Purpose

The primary objective of this review was to identify and evaluate measures used to quantify physical activity among US Latinos.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed and studies examining levels of physical activity among Spanish and English speaking Latinos were documented. This process involved identifying existing guidelines for the purpose of culturally adapting and/or translating (into Spanish) physical activity measures for the Latino population. These guidelines were used as the minimal criteria for the evaluation of the 13 identified measures of physical activity.

Results

Of these 13 measures, four were available in English and nine were available in Spanish. One English measure met the guidelines for being culturally adapted for assessing physical activity among Latinos. There were no Spanish measures that met all the guidelines for physical activity assessment among Spanish-speaking Latinos. Lastly, the identified guidelines for developing culturally appropriate measures were improved to advance physical activity measurement among ethnic and cultural groups.

Conclusion

Future research should merit the use of culturally appropriate guidelines to increase the understanding of physical activity patterns in the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. J Am Med Assoc. 2003; 289(1): 76–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jhawar M, Wallace S. Chronic Conditions of Californians: Findings from the 2003 California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2005.

  4. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2005 update. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association, 2005.

  5. US Census Bureau. U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. 2004 (cited; available from: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/.

  6. Stewart A, Napoles-Springer A. Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med Care. 2000; 38(9): 102–124.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crespo C, Smit E, Carter-Pokras O, Andersen R. Acculturation and leisure-time physical inactivity in Mexican American adults: results from NHANES III, 1988–1994. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(8): 1254–1257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Warnecke R. Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Ann Epidemiol. 1997; 7(5): 334–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kruger J, Ham SA, Kohl HW III. Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity—United States, 1994–2004. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report. 2005; 54(39): 991–994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon-Larsen PL, Adair L, Popkin B. Ethnic differences in physical activity and inactivity patterns and overweight status. Obes Res. 2002; 10(3): 141–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon-Larsen PL, Harris HK, Ward DS, Popkin B. National longitudinal study of adolescent health. Acculturation and overweight-related behaviors among Hispanic immigrants to the US: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(11): 2023–2034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reis JP, Dubose KD, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Yore MM. Reliability and validity of the occupational physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(12): 2075–2083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimsey CD, Ham SA, Macera CA, et al. Reliability of moderate and vigorous physical activity questions in the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(5S1): S114.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hulme P, Walker SN, Effle KJ, et al. Health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of Spanish speaking Hispanic adults. J Transcult Nurs. 2003; 14(3): 244–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masse LC, Fulton J, Watson KL, et al. Detecting bouts of physical activity in a field setting. Research Quarterly in Exercise & Sport. 1999; 70(3): 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shetterly S, Baxter J, Mason L, Hamman R. Self-rated health among Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white adults: the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 1798–1801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Angel R, Guarnaccia PJ. Mind, body and culture: somatization among Hispanics. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 28(12): 1229–1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marin G, Marin B. Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palloni A, Morenoff JD. Interpreting the paradoxical in the Hispanic paradox: demographic and epidemiologic approaches. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2001; 954(1): 140–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, et al. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Center for Education, US Department of Education; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss BD, Hart G, Pust RE. The relationship between literacy and health. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 1991; 1: 351–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(6): 1027–1030.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hui C, Triandis H. Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1989; 20(3): 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geisinger K. Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1994; 6(4): 304–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sperber AD, Devellis RF, Boehlecke B. Cross-cultural translation: methodology and validation. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1994; 25(4): 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Widenfelt BM, Treffers P, Beurs E, Siebelink B, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005; 8(2): 135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Available from: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/ (cited 10-07-05).

  28. Craig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amorim PRD, de Faria RC, Byrne NM, Hills AP. Physical activity and nutritional status of Brazilian children of low socioeconomic status: undernutrition and overweight. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006; 15: 217–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults. Am J Health Promot. 2003; 18: 83–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hagstromer M, Bergman P, Bauman A, Sjostrom M. The International Prevalence Study (IPS): health enhancing physical activity in Sweden. J Public Health. 2006; 14: 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, Lima RC. Physical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1894–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Topolski T, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, et al. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Preventing Chronic Disease (serial online) 2006 Oct (June 7, 2007). Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/oct/06_0001.htm.

  35. Castro C, Sallis JF, Hickman SA, et al. A prospective study of psychosocial correlates of physical activity for ethnic minorities. Psychol Health. 1999; 14: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rauh M, Hovell M, Hofstetter R, Sallis JF, Gleghorn A. Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in Latinos. Int J Epidemiol. 1992; 21(5): 966–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Donatelle RJ, et al. Physical activity social support and middle- and older-aged minority women: results from a US survey. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49(6): 781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Poston WC II, Haddock K, Olvera N, et al. Evaluation of a culturally appropriate intervention to increase physical activity. Am J Health Behav. 2001; 25(4): 396–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elosua R, Garcia M, Aguilar A, et al. Validation of the Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire in Spanish women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(8): 1431–1437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Elosua R, Marrugat J, Molina P, et al. Validation of the Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire in Spanish men. The MARATHOM Investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139(12): 1197–1209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Laffrey S. Physical activity among older Mexican American women. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(5): 383–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Marquez DX, McAuley E. Gender and acculturation influences on physical activity in Latino adults. Annals Behav Med. 2006; 31(2): 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ainsworth B, Macera CA, Jones DA, et al. Comparison of the IPAQ and BRFSS physical activity questionnaires: NPAWLS 2002. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1584–1592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Voorrips L, Ravelli A, Dongelmans P, et al. A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991; 23(8): 974–979.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood FG. Leisure time activity of Mexican Americans with diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 45(2): 190–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim S, Flaskerud JH, Guarnero PA. The impact of lay health advisors on cardiovascular health promotion: using a community-based participatory approach. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004; 19(3): 192–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Evenson KR, Sarmiento OL, Macon ML, et al. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity among Latina immigrants. Women Health. 2002; 36(2): 43–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003; 12(3): 229–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McKenzie TL, Marshall SJ, Sallis JF, Conway TL. Leisure-time physical activity in school environments: an observational study using SOPLAY. Prev Med. 2000; 30(1): 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR. SOFIT—system for observing fitness instruction time. J Teach Phys Educ. 1992; 11(2): 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sallis J, Grossman R, Pinski R, Patterson T, et al. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987; 16: 825–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Funding for this study was provided by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U48DP000036-03), in addition to the SDSU Minority Biomedical Research Scientist National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1 R25 GM58906-08). Special thanks are extended to all those who were available through personal communication (University of Washington PRC and Dr. David Marquez).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Diego Prevention Research Center, San Diego State University & University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

    Suzanna M. Martinez MS & John P. Elder Ph.D., MPH

  2. Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA

    Barbara E. Ainsworth Ph.D., MPH

  3. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

    John P. Elder Ph.D., MPH

  4. 9245 Sky Park Ct. Ste. 221, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA

    Suzanna M. Martinez MS

Authors
  1. Suzanna M. Martinez MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara E. Ainsworth Ph.D., MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John P. Elder Ph.D., MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanna M. Martinez MS.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 63 KB)

About this article

Cite this article

Martinez, S.M., Ainsworth, B.E. & Elder, J.P. A Review of Physical Activity Measures Used Among US Latinos: Guidelines for Developing Culturally Appropriate Measures. ann. behav. med. 36, 195–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9063-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9063-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation