Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Co-hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignin and Macroalgae: Effect of Process Parameters on Product Distribution

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is an effective process for bio-oil production. To date, various co-liquefaction studies have been performed using biomasses with significantly different compositions in the presence of various solvents. The present study investigates the co-hydrothermal liquefaction of Prot lignin (PL) and Sargassum tenerrimum macroalgae (ST) in water, ethanol, and water–ethanol solvent mixture in different ratios of feedstocks (1:1, 7:3, and 3:7) at 280 °C for 15-min reaction residence time. The bio-oil and bio-char yields are measured at different operating temperatures, solvent mixture, and biomass blending ratios to understand the compound distribution. Lower bio-oil and higher solid yields were obtained in co-liquefaction experiments as compared to the liquefaction of individual lignin feedstock, whereas the opposite was found with macroalgae feedstock. Individual solvent such as water and ethanol produced bio-oil yield as 5.0 wt% and 13.5 wt% (with 1:1 feedstock), respectively. Maximum bio-oil yield (51.66 wt%) was obtained with 7:3 (lignin: macroalgae feed) under water–ethanol solvent mixture. With an increase in macroalgae feed, the bio-oil yield was reduced by a significant amount (16.1 wt%). Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) results showed that organic compounds were detected in all bio-oils in the order of phenol derivatives > acids/esters > ketones/aldehydes > nitrogen-containing > aromatics compounds. Furthermore, bio-chars from co-liquefaction have been analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and elemental methods for understanding the carbon and functionality distribution in bio-chars. The present study demonstrated an efficient co-HTL process for the production of functional compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimitriadis A, Bezergianni S (2017) HTL of various biomass and waste feedstocks for biocrude production: a state of the art review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:113–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. York R (2012) Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nat Clim Change 2(6):441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milano J, Ong HC, Masjuki HH, Chong WT, Lam MK, Loh PK et al (2016) Microalgae biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuel for power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:180–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng C, Wang J, Shen D, Xue J, Guan S, Gu S, Luo KH (2017) Catalytic oxidation of lignin in solvent systems for production of renewable chemicals: a review. Polymers 9:240–265

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li C, Zhao X, Wang A, Huber GW, Zhang T (2015) Catalytic transformation of lignin for the production of chemicals and fuels. Chem Rev 115:11559–11624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas B, Kumar AA, Bisht Y, Singh R, Kumar J, Bhaskar T (2017) Effects of temperature and solvents on hydrothermal liquefaction of Sargassum tenerrimum algae. Biores Technol 242:344–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Egesa D, Chuck CJ, Plucinski P (2018) Multifunctional role of magnetic nanoparticles in efficient microalgae separation and catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 6:991–999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kandasamy S, Zhang B, He Z, Chen H, Feng H, Wang Q (2020) Effect of low-temperature catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina platensis. Energy 190:116236

  9. Aysu T, Sanna A (2015) Nannochloropsis algae pyrolysis with ceria-based catalysts for production of high-quality bio-oils. Biores Technol 194:108–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Long J, Kong W, Zhang Q, Chen L, Wang T et al (2014) Catalytic upgrading of bio-oil over Ni-based catalysts supported on mixed oxides. Energy Fuels 28(4):2562–2570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y, Wu Y, Zhang P, Hua D, Yang M, Li C et al (2012) Direct liquefaction of Dunaliellatertiolecta for bio-oil in sub/supercritical ethanolewater. Bioresour Technol 124:190–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chumpoo J, Prasassarakich P (2010) Bio-oil from hydro-liquefaction of bagasse in supercritical ethanol. Energy Fuels 24(3):2071–2077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao B, Wang H, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhao G, Ray MB, Xu CC (2020) Hydrothermal co-liquefaction of lignite and lignocellulosic biomass with the addition of formic acid: study on product distribution, characteristics, and synergistic effects. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(50):21663–21675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan C, Wang S, Cao B, Hu Y, Abomohra AEl-F et al (2019) Optimization of hydrothermal co-liquefaction of seaweeds with lignocellulosic biomass: merging 2nd and 3rd generation feedstocks for enhanced bio-oil production. Energy 173:413–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paysepar H, Ren S, Kang S, Shui H, Xu CC (2018) Catalytic co-liquefaction of lignin and lignite coal for aromatic liquid fuels and chemicals in mixed solvent of ethanol-water in the presence of a hematite ore. J Anal Appl Pyrol 134:301–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo B, Yang B, Su Y, Zhang S, Hornung U, Dahmen N (2022) Screening and optimization of microalgae biomass and plastic material coprocessing by hydrothermal liquefaction. ACS EST Engg 2:65–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. He Z, Wang B, Zhang B, Feng H, Kandasamy S, Chen H (2020) Synergistic effect of hydrothermal co-liquefaction of Spirulina platensis and lignin: optimization of operating parameters by response surface methodology. Energy 201:117550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin X, Chen-yang N, Deng-yin Z, Yan-hui G, Qi-min H et al (2019) Co-pyrolysis of rice straw and water hyacinth: characterization of products, yields and biomass interaction effect. Biomass Bioenergy 127:105281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiu S, Shahbazi A, Wang L (2016) Co-liquefaction of swine manure with waste vegetable oil for enhanced bio-oil production, Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utili. Environ Effects 38:459–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui Z, Cheng F, Jarvis JM, Brewer CE, Jena U (2020) Roles of co-solvents in hydrothermal liquefaction of low-lipid, high-protein algae. Bioresource Technol 310:123454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Biswas B, Kumar A, Fernandes AC, Saini K, Negi S, Muraleedharan UD, Bhaskar T (2020) Solid base catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of macroalgae: effects of process parameter on product yield and characterization. Bioresour Technol 307:123232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A (2011) Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 36:2328–2342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng S, Wei R, Leitch M, Xu CC (2018) Comparative study on lignocellulose liquefaction in water, ethanol, and water/ethanol mixture: roles of ethanol and water. Energy 155:234–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Y, Wu Y, Hua D, Li C, Harold MP, Wang J, Yang M (2015) Thermochemical conversion of low-lipid microalgae for the production of liquid fuels: challenges and opportunities. RSC Adv 5:18673–18701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan X, Wang J, Zeng G, Huang H, Pei X, Li H, Liu Z, Cong M (2011) Comparative studies of thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of microalgae using different organic solvents. Energy 36:6406–6412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas B, Bisht Y, Kumar J, Yenumala SR, Bhaskar T (2022) Effects of temperature and solvent on hydrothermal liquefaction of the corncob for production of phenolic monomers. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 1:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang C, Han L, Yan M, Xia J, Rong N et al (2021) Hydrothermal co-liquefaction of rice straw and waste cooking-oil model compound for bio-crude production. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 160:105360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian C, Li B, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Lu H (2014) Hydrothermal liquefaction for algal biorefinery: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:933–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang J, He QS, Yang L (2019) A review on hydrothermal co-liquefaction of biomass. Appl Energy 250:926–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Savage PE (2018) Synergistic and antagonistic interactions during hydrothermal liquefaction of soybean oil, soy protein, cellulose, xylose, and lignin. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 6:14501–14509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Biswas B, Kumar A, Kaur R, Krishna BB, Bhaskar T (2021) Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of alkali lignin over activated bio-char supported bimetallic catalyst. Bioresour Technol 337:125439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hai A, Bharath G, Rambabu K et al (2021) Pyrolysis of different date palm industrial wastes into high-quality bio-oils: a comparative study. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23:55–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ong MY, Latif NSA, Leong HY, Salman B et al (2019) Characterization and analysis of Malaysian macroalgae biomass as potential feedstock for bio-oil production. Energies 12:3509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Director, CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehradun, for his constant encouragement and support and AcSIR for granting permission to conduct this research work at CSIR-IIP. BB thanks CSIR, New Delhi, India, for his Senior Research Fellowship (SRF). The authors thank the Analytical Science Division (ASD) of CSIR-IIP for support in the form of analytical results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainability Impact Assessment Area (SIA), Material Resource Efficiency Division (MRED), CSIR-Indian Institute of Petroleum (IIP), Dehradun, 248005, India

    Bijoy Biswas, Avnish Kumar, Ramandeep Kaur, Bhavya B. Krishna & Thallada Bhaskar

  2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India

    Bijoy Biswas, Avnish Kumar, Ramandeep Kaur, Bhavya B. Krishna & Thallada Bhaskar

Authors
  1. Bijoy Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avnish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ramandeep Kaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bhavya B. Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thallada Bhaskar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bijoy Biswas: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing — original draft; Avnish Kumar: investigation; Ramandeep Kaur: formal analysis; Bhavya B Krishna: writing — review and editing; Thallada Bhaskar: conceptualization, supervision, writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thallada Bhaskar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biswas, B., Kumar, A., Kaur, R. et al. Co-hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignin and Macroalgae: Effect of Process Parameters on Product Distribution. Bioenerg. Res. 16, 33–44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10437-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10437-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation