Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Pentland, A. 2014. Social Physics. New York: Penguin Press.
Frith, C. 2005. The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4): 752–770.
Haggard, P., F. Martin, M. Taylor-Clarke, M. Jeannerod, and N. Franck. 2003. Awareness of action in schizophrenia. NeuroReport 14: 1081–1085.
Sierra, M. 2009. Depersonalization: A New Look at a Neglected Syndrome. Cambridge University Press.
Sierra, M., and G.E. Berrios. 2001. The phenomenological stability of depersonalization: Comparing the old with the new. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 189: 629–636.
Simeon, D., and J. Abugel. 2006. Feeling Unreal: Depersonalization Disorder and the Loss of the Self. Oxford University Press.
Marchetti, C., and S. Della Salla. 1998. Disentangling the alien and anarchic hand. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 3: 191–207.
Murdoch, M., J. Hill, and M. Barber. 2021. Strangled by Dr Strangelove? Anarchic hand following a posterior cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke. Age and Ageing 50: 263–264.
Besnard, J., P. Allain, G. Aubin, F. Osiurak, V. Chauviré, F. Etcharry-Bouyx, and D. Le Gall. 2010. Utilization behavior: Clinical and theoretical approaches. Journal of the International Neurophysiological Society 16: 453–462.
Lhermitte, F. 1983. Utilization behavior and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 106: 237–255.
De Renzi, E., F. Cavalleri, and S. Facchini. 1996. Imitation and utilisation behavior. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 61: 396–400.
Lhermitte, F. 1986. Human Autonomy and the Frontal Lobes. Part II: Patient Behavior in Complex Social Situations: The “Environmental Dependency Syndrome” Annals of Neurology 19:335–343.
Lhermitte, F., Pillon B., Serdaru, M. 1986. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Annals of Neurology 19(4):326–334.
Carpenter, W. 1852. On the Influence of Suggestion in Modifying and directing Muscular Movement, independently of Volition. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 147–153.
Carpenter, W. 1874/2009. Principles of Mental Physiology. Cambridge University Press.
Jastrow, J., and J. West. 1892. A study of involuntary movements. American Journal of Psychology 4: 398–407.
Tucker, M.A. 1897. Comparative observation on the involuntary movements of adults and children. American Journal of Psychology. 8 (3): 394–404.
Wegner, D. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lang, B., and J. Perner. 2002. Understanding of intention and false belief and the development of self-control. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 20: 67–76.
Montgomery, D., and M. Lightner. 2004. Children’s developing understanding of differences between their own intentional action and passive movement. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 22 (3): 417–438.
Schultz, T.R., D. Wells, and M. Sarda. 1980. The development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes and passive movements. British Journal of the Society of Clinical Psychology 19: 301–310.
Smith, M.C. 1978. Cognizing the behavior stream: The recognition of intentional action. Child Development 49: 736–743.
Wegner, D., and T. Wheatley. 1999. Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of Will. American Psychologist 54 (7): 480–492.
Reason, J.T. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.
Pacherie, E. 2008. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 107 (1): 179–217.
Shallice, T. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Norman, D., and T. Shallice. 1986. Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. In R. J. Davidson et al. (eds.) Consciousness and Self-Regulation 4. New York: Springer.
Luria, A.R. 1966. Higher cortical functions in man. London: Tavistock.
Milner, B. 1964. Some effects of frontal lobectomy in man. In J. M. Warren and K. Akert (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nelson, H. 1976. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12: 313–324.
Frith, C., S.J. Blakemore, and D. Wolpert. 2000. Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews 31 (2–3): 357–363.
Hurley, S. 1998. Consciousness in Action. Harvard University Press.
Clarke, R. 2010. Skilled Activity and the Causal Theory of Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3): 525–550.
Wolpert, D., Z. Ghahramani, and M. Jordan. 1995. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269 (5232): 1880–1882.
von Helmholtz, H. 1886. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss.
Blakemore, S.J., C. Frith, and D. Wolpert. 1999. Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 551–559.
Weiskrantz, L., J. Elliot, and C. Darlington. 1971. Preliminary observations of tickling oneself. Nature 230: 598–599.
Feinberg, I. 1978. Efference copy and corollary discharge: Implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 4: 636–640.
Farrer, C., and C. Frith. 2002. Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage 15: 596–603.
Balslev, D., J. Cole, and R. Miall. 2007. Proprioception contributes to the sense of agency during visual observation of hand movements: Evidence from temporal judgments of action. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 (9): 1535–1541.
MacDonald, P., and T. Paus. 2003. The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex 13 (9): 962–967.
David, N., Stenzel, A., Schneider, T., Engel, A. 2011. The feeling of agency: empirical indicators for pre-reflective level of action awareness. Frontiers in Psychology 2(149). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00149
Farrer, C., M. Bouchereau, M. Jeannerod, and N. Franck. 2008. Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behavioral Neurology 19 (1–2): 53–57.
Haggard, P., and V. Chambon. 2012. Sense of agency. Current Biology 22: R390–R392.
Wenke, D., S. Fleming, and P. Haggard. 2010. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 115: 26–38.
Nahmias, E. 2005. Agency, authorship, and illusion. Consciousness and Cognition 14: 771–785.
Jensen, M., E. Vagnoni, M. Overgaard, and P. Haggard. 2014. Experience of action depends on intention, not body movement: An experiment on memory for mens rea. Neuropsychologia 55: 122–127.
Chambon, V., Sidarus, N., Haggard, P. 2014. From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(320).
Oppenheimer, D. 2008. The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 237–241.
Shneiderman, B., et al. 2016. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 6th ed. Pearson.
Limerick, H., D. Coyle, and J. Moore. 2014. The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 1–8.
Harris, B., Regan, T., Schueler, J., Fields, S. 2020. Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11(672).
Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., and M. Blau. 2016. Cross-generational analysis of predictive factors of addictive behavior in smartphone usage. Computers in Human Behavior 64: 682–693.
Busch, P., Hausvik, G., Ropstad, O., Pettersen, D. 2021. Smartphone usage among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 121:106783.
Elhai, J., J. Levine, R. Dvorak, and B. Hall. 2016. Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior 63: 509–516.
Wolniewicz, C., M. Tiamiyu, J. Weeks, and J. Elhai. 2018. Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation. Psychiatry Research 262: 618–623.
Olufadi, Y. 2015. Gravitating towards mobile phone (GoToMP) during lecture periods by students: Why are they using it? And how can it be measured? Computers & Education 87: 423–436.
Wang, J.L., H.Z. Wang, J. Gaskin, and L.H. Wang. 2015. The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior 53: 181–188.
Heitmayer, M., and S. Lahlou. 2021. Why are smartphones disruptive? An empirical study of smartphone use in real-live contexts. Computers in Human Behavior 116:106637.
Sie, M., M. Slors, and B. Brink. 2004. Reasons of One’s Own. Routledge.
Alter, A. 2017. Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. Penguin Press.
Khalighinejad, N., and P. Haggard. 2016. Extending experiences of voluntary action by association. PNAS 113 (31): 8867–8872.
Reich, R., Sahami, M., Weinstein, J. 2021. System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot. HarperCollins.
Blakemore, SJ. Wolpert, D., and C. Frith. 2000. Why can’t you tickle yourself? NeuroReport 11 (11): 11–16.
Blakemore, S.J., J. Smith, R. Steel, C.E. Johnstone, and C.D. Frith. 2000. The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: Evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychological Medicine 30: 1131–1139.
Bratman, M. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., and K. Douglas. 2016. How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior 63: 9–18.
James, W. 1890/1950. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.
Jeannerod, M. 1997. The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chen, J., Liang, Y., Mai, C., Zhong, X., Qu, C. 2016. General Deficit in Inhibitory Control of Excessive Smartphone Users: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential Study. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1–9.
Conchiglia, G., Della Rocca, G., Grossi, D. 2007. On a Peculiar Environmental Dependency Syndrome in a Case with Frontal-Temporal Damage: Zelig-like Syndrome. Neurocase 13:1–5.