Deep Brain Stimulation Through the “Lens of Agency”: Clarifying Threats to Personal Identity from Neurological Intervention
- 385 Downloads
This paper explores the impacts of neurological intervention on selfhood with reference to recipients’ claims about changes to their self-understanding following Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. In the neuroethics literature, patients’ claims such as: “I don’t feel like myself anymore” and “I feel like a machine”, are often understood as expressing threats to identity. In this paper I argue that framing debates in terms of a possible threat to identity—whether for or against the proposition, is mistaken and occludes what is ethically salient in changes from DBS. Rather, by adopting a relational narrative approach to identity and autonomy, I show that the ethically salient issue from DBS is impacts on autonomous agency—whether one’s actions and beliefs are one’s own, and how DBS may hinder, or foster, embodied, relational autonomy competences. This approach recognizes that if sufficiently significant, impacts on autonomy competences may pose a threat to one’s ability to contribute to the process of authoring one’s own life and so pose a threat to identity formation. I argue this approach resolves the confusion in the literature about whether and how DBS threatens identity and provides a complex picture of how DBS may affect selfhood by disrupting narrative identity formation and revision, distorting agency and/or undermining autonomy.
KeywordsPersonal identity Autonomy Deep brain stimulation Agency Authenticity
Research for this project was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Scheme (Project Number CE 140100012).
- 8.Schechtman, Marya. 2010. Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21: 133–139.Google Scholar
- 10.Mackenzie, Catriona, and Mary Jean Walker. 2014. Neurotechnologies, personal identity, and the ethics of authenticity. In Handbook of neuroethics, ed. Jens Clausen and Neil Levy, 374–392. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- 17.Elliot, Carl. 2003. Better than well: American medicine meets the America dream. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- 18.Focquaert, F., and D. De Ridder. 2009. Direct intervention in the brain, ethical issues concerning personal identity. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 4(2): 1–7.Google Scholar
- 21.Schechtman, Marya. 2011. The narrative self. In The Oxford handbook of the self, ed. Shaun Gallagher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 22.Schechtman, Marya. 2009. Getting our stories straight: self-narrative and personal identity. In Personal identity and fractured selves: perspectives from philosophy, ethics and neuroscience, ed. D.J.H. Mathews, H. Bok, and P.V. Rabins, 65–92. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Schechtman, Marya. 1996. The constitution of selves. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Baylis, Françoise. 2012. The self in situ: a relational account of personal identity. In Being relational: reflections on relational theory and health law, ed. J. Downie and J.J. Llewellyn, 109–131. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 1989. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
- 28.Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar, eds. 2000. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar