Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of filtration on right ventricular function by the gated blood pool SPECT

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Gated blood po ol single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS) offers the possibility of obtaining additional functional information from blood pool studies, including evaluation of left and right ventricular function simultaneously. The calculation of ventricular volumes based on the identification of the endocardial surface would be influenced by the spatial resolution in the reconstructed images. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of different filters on the right ventricular function.

Methods

The normal four-dimensional (4-D) NURBS-based cardiac-torso (NCAT) phantom with known right ventricular volume and ejection fraction was generated. The SIMIND Monte Carlo program was used to create projections. The studies were reconstructed by FBP and post-processing filtration such as Butterworth, Hanning, Shepp-Logan, Metz and Wiener in different statuses (cutoff and order). Using the Cedars–Sinai QBS (quantitative blood pool SPECT) package, the ventricular functional parameters were computed. The calculated values were analyzed and compared with the normal NCAT results.

Results

The results implied that the calculated right ventricular end diastolic volume (RVEDV) by Butterworth filtration (cutoff frequency = 0.3) agreed more with the NCAT Phantom characteristics [relative difference percentage (RDP) = 1.2 %], while the maximum accordance in the calculation of the RV ejection fraction (EF) (RDP = 3 %) was observed by Metz filter (FWHM 20 pixel). Also, the results of this study demonstrate that the Butterworth filter provided the most stable values (cutoff frequency = 0.4–0.5) in the estimation of RVEDV (RDP = 7.5 %). The Hanning and Shepp-Logan filters produced a much larger RDP, particularly in low frequency (41.1 and 21.5 %, respectively) compared to other filters.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the operation of different filters has a severe effect in computing right ventricular volume. The resolution recovery and Butterworth filters tend to give more comparable ventricular volumes with the actual normal NCAT value. Further evaluation using a large clinical database is underway to evaluate the optimum protocol in a clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Ramani GV, Gurm G, Dilsizian V, Park MH. Noninvasive assessment of right ventricular function: will there be resurgence in radionuclide imaging techniques? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12(2):162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greyson CR. Evaluation of right ventricular function. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011;13(3):194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daou D, Van Kriekinge SD, Coaguila C, Lebtahi R, Fourme T, Sitbon O, Parent F, Slama M, Le Guludec D, Simonneau G. Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(3):293–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nichols KJ, Van Tosh A, De Bondt P, Bergmann SR, Palestro CJ, Reichek N. Normal limits of gated blood pool SPECT count-based regional cardiac function parameters. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24(7):717–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hebert T, Gopal S, Moore W, Wendt R, Ting Y, Murphy P, editors. Monte Carlo simulation of gated SPECT cardiac blood pool studies. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1994, IEEE Conference Record: IEEE.

  6. King MA, Schwinger RB, Doherty PW, Penney BC. Two-dimensional filtering of SPECT images using the Metz and Wiener filters. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 1984;25(11):1234–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyra M, Ploussi A. Filtering in SPECT image reconstruction. J Biomed Imaging. 2011;2011:10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsui B. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Physics of SPECT. Radiographics. 1996;16(1):173–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Links JM, Jeremy RW, Dyer SM, Frank TL, Becker LC. Wiener filtering improves quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with thallium-201 SPECT. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 1990;31(7):1230–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takavar A, Shamsipour G, Sohrabi M, Eftekhari M. Determination of optimum filter in myocardial SPECT: a phantom study. Iran J Radiat Res. 2004;1(4):205–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vakhtangandze T, Hall D, Zananiri F, Rees M. The effect of Butterworth and Metz reconstruction filters on volume and ejection fraction calculations with 99Tcm gated myocardial SPECT. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(932):733–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yusoff MNS, Zakaria A. Determination of the optimum filter for qualitative and quantitative 99mTc myocardial SPECT imaging. Iran J Radiat Res. 2009;6(4):173–81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manish O, Kheruka SC, Barai S, Gambhir S. Do reconstruction filters really effect the volume and ejection fraction calculation with 99mTc-sestamibi gated myocardial SPECT? Indian J Nucl Med IJNM Off J Soc Nucl Med India. 2010;25(4):156.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright GA, McDade M, Martin W, Hutton I. Quantitative gated SPECT: the effect of reconstruction filter on calculated left ventricular ejection fractions and volumes. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47(8):N99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marie P-Y, Djaballah W, Franken PR, Vanhove C, Muller MA, Boutley H, Poussier S, Olivier P, Karcher G, Bertrand A. OSEM reconstruction, associated with temporal Fourier and depth-dependant resolution recovery filtering, enhances results from sestamibi and 201Tl 16-interval gated SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(11):1789–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yussoff MS, Zakaria A. Relationship between the optimum cut off frequency for Butterworth filter and lung-heart ratio in 99m Tc myocardial SPECT. Iran J Radiat Res. 2010;8(1):17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daou D, Kotbi O, Siano E, Coaguila C. Gated blood pool SPECT: better performance of QBS Software with iterative reconstruction combined to resolution recovery as compared to filtered backprojection. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(suppl_2):1727.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karzoun S, Paul A, Anderson P, Erb D, Platt B, Nabi H. Effects of reconstruction on the electrocardiographic gated blood pool SPECT measurements. J Nucl Med Meet Abstr. 2006;47(suppl_1):534P-b.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Daou D, Tawileh M, Coaguila C. Gated blood pool SPECT processing with QBS software: does it perform better with iterative reconstruction and resolution recovery versus filtered backprojection? J Nucl Med Meet Abstr. 2011;52(1_MeetingAbstracts):1159.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daou D, Kotbi O, Siano E, Coaguila C. Gated blood pool SPECT: QBS software performs better with iterative reconstruction than filtered backprojection. J Nucl Med Meet Abstr. 2013;54(2_MeetingAbstracts):1727.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Segars WP, Tsui B, Lalush D, Frey E, King M, Manocha D. Development and application of the new dynamic Nurbs-based Cardiac-Torso (NCAT) phantom. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Veress AI, Segars WP, Weiss JA, Tsui BM, Gullberg GT. Normal and pathological NCAT image and phantom data based on physiologically realistic left ventricle finite-element models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25(12):1604–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanhove C, Walgraeve N, Everaert H, et al. Comparison between two automatic algorithms to determine left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated blood pool tomography. J Nucl Med. 2001 (abstract);42(5):167.

  24. Van Kriekinge SD, Berman DS, Germano G. Automatic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood pool SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6(5):498–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohseni S, Kamaliasl A, Bitarafan-Rajabi A, Entezarmahdi SM, Yaghoobi N, Shahpouri Z. The Effect of Filtrating and reconstruction method on ventricular function by the gated blood pool SPECT. EANM Congress 2013- October, 19–23 Lyon, France. 2013;TP037.

  26. Kim S-J, Kim I-J, Kim Y-S, Kim Y-K, Shin YB, Kim D-S. Automatic quantification of right ventricular volumes and right ventricular ejection fraction with gated blood pool SPECT: comparison of 8-and 16-frame gated blood pool SPECT with first-pass radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12(5):553–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oppenheim AV, Willsky AS, Nawab SH. Signals and systems. 2nd ed. NJ: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Paul Segars for his helpful comments. We specially thank the partner and staff at the Cardiovascular Interventional Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical and Research Center, Rajaei Cardio-vascular Hospital for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Kamali-Asl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohseni, S., Kamali-Asl, A., Bitarafan-Rajabi, A. et al. Effects of filtration on right ventricular function by the gated blood pool SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 29, 384–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-0949-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-0949-7

Keywords

Navigation