Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of cerebral perfusion SPECT analysis using SPM8, eZIS and vbSEE for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy-parkinsonism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Although a correct diagnosis is important for appropriate management, accurately differentiating between multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) is often difficult because of similarities in the early-stage symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and voxel-based analysis for diagnosing MSA-P patients.

Methods

Thirty-eight subjects (9 with early-stage MSA-P, 11 with PD, and 18 controls) were included in this study. Z-scores suggestive of hypoperfusion were calculated between patients and controls using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) 8 and easy Z-score imaging system (eZIS) programs. A voxel-based stereotactic extraction estimation (vbSEE) program was performed to determine the target volumes of interest (VOIs) in the putamen, pons, and cerebellum, and quantify Z-scores as “extent” (the rate of voxels with a Z-score >2.0 in these VOIs) and “severity” (average Z-scores in these VOIs). These parameters were used as the determinant in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results

The extent and severity of the cerebellar VOIs were higher in MSA-P patients than in PD patients. In ROC analyses, the extent and severity of the cerebellar VOI exhibited the highest areas under the curves of 0.86 and 0.84, and accuracies of 90 and 90 %, respectively.

Conclusions

The diagnostic value of significant cerebellar hypoperfusion was the highest for differentiating MSA-P from PD. This voxel-based analysis of cerebral perfusion SPECT using the SPM8, eZIS, and vbSEE programs is useful for clinically diagnosing MSA-P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008;71:670–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Litvan I, Goetz CG, Jankovic J, Wenning GK, Booth V, Bartko JJ, et al. What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:937–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Juh R, Kim J, Moon D, Choe B, Suh T. Different metabolic patterns analysis of Parkinsonism on the 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:223–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang CC, Poston KL, Eckert T, Feigin A, Frucht S, Gudesblatt M, et al. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a metabolic imaging study using pattern analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:149–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimura N, Hanaki S, Masuda T, Hanaoka T, Hazama Y, Okazaki T, et al. Brain perfusion differences in parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2010;26:2530–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosman T, Van Laere K, Santens P. Anatomically standardised 99 mTc-ECD brain perfusion SPET allows accurate differentiation between healthy volunteers, multiple system atrophy and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:16–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Laere K, Casteels C, De Ceuninck L, Vanbilloen B, Maes A, Mortelmans L, et al. Dual-tracer dopamine transporter and perfusion SPECT in differential diagnosis of parkinsonism using template-based discriminant analysis. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:384–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N, Albanese A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Fowler CJ, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci. 1999;163:94–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taniwaki T, Nakagawa M, Yamada T, Yoshida T, Ohyagi Y, Sasaki M, et al. Cerebral metabolic changes in early multiple system atrophy: a PET study. J Neurol Sci. 2002;200:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakurai K, Yamawaki T, Okita K, Kato D, Matsukawa N, Kawaguchi T, et al. Utility of the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in detecting a hyperintense putaminal rim in multiple system atrophy-parkinsonism: a preliminary study. Eur Neurol. 2011;66:42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubey R, Zhou J, Wang Y, Thompson PM, Ye J, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Analysis of sampling techniques for imbalanced data: an n = 648 ADNI study. Neuroimage. 2014;87:220–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Waragai M, Yamada T, Matsuda H. Evaluation of brain perfusion SPECT using an easy Z-score imaging system (eZIS) as an adjunct to early-diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci. 2007;260:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uruma G, Hashimoto K, Abo M. A new method for evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury with neuropsychological impairment using statistical imaging analysis for Tc-ECD SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:187–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mizumura S, Kumita S, Cho K, Ishihara M, Nakajo H, Toba M, et al. Development of quantitative analysis method for stereotactic brain image: assessment of reduced accumulation in extent and severity using anatomical segmentation. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui H, Udaka F, Miyoshi T, Hara N, Tamura A, Oda M, et al. Brain perfusion differences between Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawai Y, Suenaga M, Takeda A, Ito M, Watanabe H, Tanaka F, et al. Cognitive impairments in multiple system atrophy: MSA-C vs MSA-P. Neurology. 2008;70:1390–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Laere K, Santens P, Bosman T, De Reuck J, Mortelmans L, Dierckx R. Statistical parametric mapping of (99m)Tc-ECD SPECT in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features: correlation with clinical parameters. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:933–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cilia R, Marotta G, Benti R, Pezzoli G, Antonini A. Brain SPECT imaging in multiple system atrophy. J Neural Transm. 2005;112:1635–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fahn S, Elton RL, UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Goldstein M, editors. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. New York: Macmillan; 1987. p. 153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muñoz E, Iranzo A, Rauek S, Lomeña F, Gallego J, Ros D, et al. Subclinical nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in the cerebellar subtype of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C). J Neurol. 2011;258:2248–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Imabayashi E, Matsuda H, Asada T, Ohnishi T, Sakamoto S, Nakano S, et al. Superiority of 3-dimensional stereotactic surface projection analysis over visual inspection in discrimination of patients with very early Alzheimer’s disease from controls using brain perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1450–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Imabayashi E, Inoue T. Neurostatistical imaging for diagnosing dementia: translational approach from laboratory neuroscience to clinical routine. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30:755–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Minoshima S, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Posterior cingulate cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1994;344(8926):895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto Y, Onoguchi M, Kawakami K, Haramoto M, Wake R, Horiguchi J, et al. Evaluation of the difference-correction effect of the gamma camera systems used by easy Z-score Imaging System (eZIS) analysis. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:263–75.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Inui Y, Toyama H, Manabe Y, Sarai M, Iwata N. Comparison of (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy, brain perfusion SPECT, and voxel-based MRI morphometry for distinguishing between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:796–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakurai K, Kawaguchi T, Kawai T, Ogino H, Hara M, Okita K, et al. Usefulness of 3D-PRESTO imaging in evaluating putaminal abnormality in parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy. Neuroradiology. 2010;52:809–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamei H, Nakajima T, Fukuhara N. Statistic rCBF study of extrapyramidal disorders. No To Shinkei. 2002;54:667–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Feigin A, Antonini A, Fukuda M, De Notaris R, Benti R, Pezzoli G, et al. Tc-99m ethylene cysteinate dimer SPECT in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2002;17:1265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kikuchi A, Takeda A, Kimpara T, Nakagawa M, Kawashima R, Sugiura M, et al. Hypoperfusion in the supplementary motor area, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and insular cortex in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2001;193:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Imon Y, Matsuda H, Ogawa M, Kogure D, Sunohara N. SPECT image analysis using statistical parametric mapping in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi C) (24591785; KS).

Ethical standard

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that this manuscript does not contain patients’ private information and the privacy of the patients is completely protected.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keita Sakurai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakurai, K., Imabayashi, E., Ito, K. et al. The utility of cerebral perfusion SPECT analysis using SPM8, eZIS and vbSEE for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy-parkinsonism. Ann Nucl Med 29, 206–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0928-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0928-4

Keywords

Navigation