Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in phonetic processing

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In research on dyslexia, inadequate or inappropriate comparisons have often been made with control subjects, frequently overlooking important gender differences. More information is needed regarding the performance of control subjects, and adults, on measures purportedly assessing phonological and orthographic processing. Using tests similar to those used in dyslexic research, 20 female and 20 male college-age students were tested to examine gender differences in phonetic processing skills. The findings suggest that in equally competent readers, gender and other factors do play a significant role in determining the time it takes for phoneme manipulation and word identification. Females, especially those with poorer academic records, are significantly slower than males on measures typically used in dyslexic research. These findings show a need for a reexamination of control group equivalence (especially regarding gender), and further exploration of variables that might influence performance on these tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A., & Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain and Language 40: 471–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology 28: 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Ledez J. (1983). Phonological awareness in reading-disabled adults. Australian Journal of Psychology 35: 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language 39:485–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finucci, J. M., & Childs, B. (1981). Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, & N. Gartrell (eds.), Sex differences in dyslexia. Towson, MD: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjessing, H. J., & Karlsen, B. (1989). A longitudinal study of dyslexia: Bergen’s multivariate study of children’s learning disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 104: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitz, W. R., & Nash, R. T. (1992). Testing the effectiveness of the Project Success Summer Program for adult dyslexies. Annals of Dyslexia 42: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitz, W. R., & Tarver, S. G. (1989). Comparison of dyslexic and nondyslexic adults on decoding and phonemic awareness tasks. Annals of Dyslexia 39: 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masland, R. L. (1981). Summary of the conference proceedings. In A. Ansara. N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, & N. Gartrell (eds.), Sex differences in dyslexia. Towson, MD: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D. G., & Barber, P. J. (1981). Sex differences in verbal skills: Use of spelling-sound and lexical information. Current Psychological Research 1: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., Van Orden, G. C, Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexies. Child Development 61: 1753–1778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexies. Psychological Science 6: 250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1981). The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7: 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. L., Eilers, R. E., Gross-Glenn, K., & Jallad, B. (1992). Speech perception in adult subjects with familial dyslexia. Journal of Speech and Hearing 35: 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (1996). A double-deficit hypothesis of reading: Phonemic awareness and naming speed. Poster presented at the 104th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

  • Thompson, G. B. (1987). Three studies of predicted gender differences in processes of word reading. Journal of Educational Research 80: 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallschlaeger, M., Hendricks, B. Gender differences in phonetic processing. Curr Psychol 16, 155–166 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1021-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1021-0

Keywords

Navigation