Abstract
When studying the mechanism of the influence of perceived overqualification on innovative behavior, most existing studies focus on factors such as organizational identification and creative self-confidence, while factors related to self-concept are neglected. Using self-representation theory as a general framework, this study examined the psychological mechanisms between feelings of overqualification and employee innovative behavior from the perspective of self-concept. In addition, the moderating effects of popularity and distributed leadership were examined. We collected survey data from 322 employees and analyzed it using structural equation modeling techniques. The results of the study indicated that perceived overqualification negatively influenced employees’ innovative behavior through perceived insider status (PIS) and organization-based self-esteem (OBSE). Popularity and distributed leadership positively moderated the negative effect of perceived overqualification on PIS and OBSE, respectively. This study elucidates the unique psychological mechanism of perceived overqualification to employee innovative behaviors through a new theoretical perspective, refines and complements the research on boundary conditions of perceived overqualification, also expands the application of distributed leadership in the context of corporate organizations, which is of great practical significance for companies to promote employee innovation by utilizing the human capital of overqualified employees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleksandra, L., & Christiane, S. (2016). When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5).
Blader, S. L., Patil, S., & Packer, D. J. (2017). Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 19–34.
Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., & Wang, Q. A. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 915–934.
Brockner, J. (1988). Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice. [J]. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Chang, C., & Arisanti, I. (2022). How does spiritual Leadership influences Employee Well-Being? Findings from PLS-SEM and FsQCA[J]. Emerging Science Journal, 6(6), 1358–1374.
Dar, N., Ahmad, S., & Rahman, W. (2022). How and when overqualification improves innovative work behaviour: The roles of creative self-confidence and psychological safety[J]. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2461–2481.
Deng, H., Guan, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2018). A relational model of Perceived Overqualification: The moderating role of interpersonal influence on Social Acceptance[J]. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3288–3310.
Douglass, R. P., & Duffy, R. D. (2015). Strengths use and life satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Approach[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(3), 619–632.
Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J. M., et al. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad Situation for individuals and Organizations[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Erdogan, B., Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z., Caughlin, D. E., et al. (2020a). Employee overqualification and manager job insecurity: Implications for employee career outcomes[J]. Human Resource Management, 59(6), 555–567.
Erdogan, B., Karaeminogullari, A., Bauer, T. N., et al. (2020b). Perceived overqualification at work: Implications for extra-role behaviors and advice network Centrality[J]. Journal of Management, 46(4), 583–606.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary Statement[J]. American Sociological Review, 161–178.
Gouthier, M. H. J., Rhein, M., & Goudarzi, K. (2011). Organizational pride and its positive effects on employee behavior[J]. Journal of Service Management, 22(5), 633–649.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared Leadership and Innovation: The role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity[J]. Journal of business and psychology, 28(2), 159–174.
Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565–575.
Ismail, H. N., Kertechian, K. S., & Blaique, L. (2023). Visionary leadership, organizational trust, organizational pride, and organizational citizenship behaviour: A sequential mediation model[J]. Human Resource Development International, 26(3), 264–291.
Koopman, J., Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., et al. (2015). Ingratiation and popularity as antecedents of justice: A social exchange and social capital perspective[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 132–148.
Lapsomboonkamol, S., Songkram, N., Thamsuwan, P., et al. (2022). The Mediating Effect of Knowledge Integration on the relationship between capability and innovative Behaviour[J]. Emerging Science Journal, 6, 92–107.
Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying Organizational Identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080.
Lee, W. R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S. (2021). How Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Job Autonomy[J]. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 13(4):1901.
Liao, P. Y. (2015). The role of Self-Concept in the mechanism linking proactive personality to employee work Outcomes[J]. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 64(2), 421–443.
Lin, B., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is Underemployment related to Creativity and OCB? A Task-crafting explanation of the Curvilinear Moderated Relations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 156–177.
Liu, S., Luksyte, A., Zhou, L., et al. (2015). Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 250–271.
Liu, W., Zhang, P., Liao, J. (2016). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification[J]. Management Decision.
MARKUS, H., & WURF E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337.
Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 509–536.
Niu, W., Yuan, Q., Qian, S. (2018). Authentic leadership and employee job behaviors: The mediating role of relational and organizational identification and the moderating role of LMX[J]. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 37(4):982–994.
Perceived organizational support. (2011). Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees[Z] (p. 26). Ringgold, Inc.
Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature[J]. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591–622.
Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes[J]. American Sociological Review :141–156.
Scott, B. A. (2013). A conceptual framework for the study of popularity in the workplace[Z] (Vol. 3, pp. 161–186). SAGE Publications.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2009). The Popularity Contest at Work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 20–33.
Scott, K. L., Restubog, S., & Zagenczyk, T. J. A. (2013). Social Exchange-based model of the antecedents of Workplace Exclusion[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 37–48.
Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 875–894.
Tang, T. L. I. A. (1998). Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Revisited: Public Personnel in the United States and in the Middle East[J]. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), 529–549.
Theocharis, N., Leligou, H. C., & Tseles, D. (2022). Innovation for people with disabilities in Hospitality Industry: A Theoretical Approach[J]. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 3(1), 102–114.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and Behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.
Wang, X. F., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., et al. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader-member exchange perspectives: SOCIAL TIES, LMX, AND INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 403–420.
Xiong Chen, Z., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the Cultural Context of mediating processes in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226–238.
Yu, H., Yang, F., Wang, T. (2021). How perceived overqualification relates to work alienation and emotional exhaustion: The moderating role of LMX[J]. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 40(12):6067–6075.
Zagenczyk, T. J., Gibney, R., Few, W. T., et al. (2011). Psychological contracts and organizational identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support[J]. Journal of Labor Research, 32(3), 254–281.
Zhang, M. J., Law, K. S., & Lin, B. L. (2016). You think you are big fish in a small pond? Perceived overqualification, goal orientations, and proactivity at work[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 37(1), 61–84.
Zhang, M., Wang, F., & Li, N. (2021a). The Effect of Perceived Overqualification on Creative Performance: Person-Organization Fit Perspective[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
Zhang, M., Wang, F., & Li, N. (2021b). The Effect of Perceived Overqualification on Creative Performance: Person-Organization Fit Perspective[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 582367.
Funding
Shandong Province Teaching Research Project “Improvement of the Connotation of Higher Education (Quality of Graduate Education) 2017” (RC1900007647).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
He, G., Li, W. The Paradox of excess: how perceived overqualification shapes innovative behavior through self-concept. Curr Psychol 43, 17487–17499 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05703-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05703-4