Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employees’ unethical pro-family behavior

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing maturity of supportive office technologies and applied software represented by instantaneous communication and online office, work connectivity behavior after-hours has emerged in various industries as a modern and flexible management method, which expects employees to remain “online” after office hours. The transition from “invisible overtime” to “voluntary overtime” has garnered widespread attention from scholars. Initially, work connectivity behavior after-hours has been proven to significantly enhance work autonomy and flexibility, improving work efficiency, job satisfaction, and creativity. However, with the excessive use of work connectivity after-hours, its negative effects have gradually become evident. In light of conservation of resources theory and social identity theory, this research attempts to explore the mechanism through which work connectivity after-hours affects unethical pro-family behavior. Hierarchical regression, experimental methods and fsQCA are used for data analysis and verification of hypotheses. Research results shed light on the following findings: (1) work connectivity behavior after-hours could not only directly enhance employees’ unethical pro-family behavior, but also indirectly enhance this behavior through work-family conflict; (2) family motivation could strengthen the positive relationship between work-family conflict and unethical pro-family behavior, while organizational identity could weaken this positive relationship; (3) the synergistic effect of family motivation and organizational identity could weaken the positive relationship between work-family conflict and unethical pro-family behavior. To sum up, this research provides solid evidence for the negative impact of work connectivity after-hours on employees’ family and work, and calls for enterprises to resort to cultivation of organizational identity as a means to restrain the negative effects of work connectivity after-hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adkins, C. L., & Premeaux, S. A. (2014). The use of communication technology to manage work-home boundaries. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15(2), 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2014). Work–family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 376–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2020). A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, L. K., Jenkins, et al. (2014). Creating technological boundaries to protect bedtime: Examining work-home boundary management, psychological detachment and sleep. Stress and health: journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 30(3), 259–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barriga Medina, H. R., Campoverde Aguirre, R., Coello-Montecel, D., Ochoa Pacheco, P., & Paredes-Aguirre, M. I. (2021). The influence of work–family conflict on burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: The effect of teleworking overload. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(19), 10302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, L. Y., Becker, W. J., & Conroy, S. A. (2020). The invisible leash: the impact of organizational expectations for email monitoring after-hours on employee resources, well-being, and turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 45(5), 709–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2011). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles, J. S., & Hair, J., Jr. (1997). Role Stress, Work-Family Conflict and Emotional Exhaustion: Inter-Relationships and Effects on Some Work-Related Consequences. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The Use of Communication Technologies After Hours: The Role of Work Attitudes and Work-Life Conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K., Cao, X., Guo, L., & Xia, Q. (2022). Work connectivity behavior after-hours and job satisfaction: Examining the moderating effects of psychological entitlement and perceived organizational support. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2277–2293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks, D., Van Mierlo, H., & Schmitz, E. B. (2014). A Diary Study on Work-Related Smartphone Use, Psychological Detachment and Exhaustion: Examining the Role of the Perceived Segmentation Norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 74–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M., Zhang, T., Li, Y., & Ren, Z. (2022). The effect of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employee psychological distress: the role of leader workaholism and work-to-family conflict. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, M. S., Jeffrey, H., et al. (2011). Job level, demands, and resources as antecedents of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, T. L., & Smith, J. (2018). The paradox of family structure and plans after work: why single childless employees may be the least absorbed at work. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1231–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effelsberg, D., & Solga, M. (2015). Transformational leaders' in-group versus out-group orientation: Testing the link between leaders' organizational identification, their willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior, and follower-perceived transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, & Jerald. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, C., & Sun, P. (2023). Behavioral effects of performance in distinguishing between work connectivity behavior after-hours: recognition role to compensation payments of workers fairly. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., et al. (2012). Team creativity: the effects of perceived learning culture, developmental feedback and team cohesion. International Journal of Training and Development, 16, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. B., & Ganotice, F. A. (2015). Does family obligation matter for students' motivation, engagement, and well-being?: It depends on your self-construal. Personality & Individual Differences, 86, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühnel, J., Vahle-Hinz, T., de Bloom, J., & Syrek, C. J. (2020). Staying in touch while at work: Relationships between personal social media use at work and work-nonwork balance and creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(10), 1235–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, N. Z. A., & Arif, L. S. M. (2017). Systematic literature review: work connectivity after hours, the antecedents and effects towards individual employee and organization. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, 12(2), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, E. Y., Lau, V. P., Hui, R. T. Y., & Kong, K. H. (2019). A resource-based perspective on work–family conflict: Meta-analytical findings. Career Development International, 24(1), 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Liao, H., & Liu, Y. (2020). For the sake of my family: understanding unethical pro-family behavior in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(7), 638–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu, X., & Fan, Y. (2020). Research on the relationship of work family conflict, work engagement and job crafting: A gender perspective. Current Psychology, 1–11.

  • Menges, J. I., Tussing, D. V., Wihler, A., et al. (2017). When Job Performance is All Relative: How Family Motivation Energizes Effort and Compensates for Intrinsic Motivation. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 695–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & Mcmurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S., Saul, D., Dearien, C., & Hernandez, N. (2023). Self-Employment or Selfless Employment? Exploration of Factors that Motivate, Facilitate, and Constrain Latina Entrepreneurship from a Family Embeddedness Perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 44(1), 206–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, & Toby, L. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1193–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, N. C., Doyle, S. P., Lount, R. B., et al. (2016). Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 44-68.

  • Ragin, C. C. (2014). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies[M]. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. M., & Thompson, C. A. (2012). High tech tethers and work-family conflict: A conservation of resources approach. Engineering Management Research, 1(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & Sintemaartensdijk, N. (2010). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoss, M. K., Jundt, D. K., Kobler, A., et al. (2015). Doing Bad to Feel Better? An Investigation of Within- and Between-Person Perceptions of Counterproductive Work Behavior as a Coping Tactic. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P. A., Post, C., Brockner, J., et al. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, E., & Laghate, K. (2023). Individual self-concept and after-hours work behavior: Effect on employee engagement and the moderating roles of POS and PSS. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soewarno, N., Tjahjadi, B., & Fithrianti, F. (2019). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green organizational identity and environmental organizational legitimacy. Management Decision, 57(11), 3061–3078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., et al. (2004). A cross - national comparative study of work - family stressors, working hours. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, C. L., & Johlke, M. C. (2003). The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., et al. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zoonen, W., Treem, J. W., & Sivunen, A. E. (2023). Staying connected and feeling less exhausted: The autonomy benefits of after-hour connectivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

  • Vecchiato, & Riccardo. (2017). Disruptive innovation, managerial cognition, and technology competition outcomes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 116, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Zhang, Z., & Shi, W. (2023). Relationship between daily work connectivity behavior after hours and work–leisure conflict: Role of psychological detachment and segmentation preference. Psychology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.625.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (20BGL148).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongxu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Informed consent

"Written consent" is not needed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Bai, Q., Yuan, Y. et al. Impact of work connectivity behavior after-hours on employees’ unethical pro-family behavior. Curr Psychol 43, 11785–11803 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05291-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05291-9

Keywords

Navigation