Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Doing Bad to Feel Better? An Investigation of Within- and Between-Person Perceptions of Counterproductive Work Behavior as a Coping Tactic

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employee counterproductive work behavior (CWB, e.g., theft, production deviance, interpersonal abuse) is costly to organizations and those who work within them. Evidence suggests that employees are motivated to engage in CWB because they believe that these behaviors will make them feel better in response to negative workplace events. However, research has yet to consider the situational and individual factors that shape the extent to which employees view CWB in such a manner. In order to provide insight into the decision-making process surrounding the use of CWB as a coping strategy, this study leverages coping theory to examine the factors (both situational/within-person and individual/between-person) that contribute to employees’ beliefs that CWBs will be instrumental for emotion regulation aims in response to workplace stressors. In a repeated measures scenario-based study of 297 employees, we found that individuals’ perceived coping instrumentalities for CWBs are a function of the controllability and source of the stressor as well as a more stable learned response to stressful situations at work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

  2. Consistent with Edwards (2008), we investigated the possibility that these interactions may be spurious due to curvilinear effects by including quadratic effects of control and the moderators in each respective model. Because including the quadratic variables did not substantially change the significance and interpretation of any of the interactions, and because we had no theoretical reason to presume any curvilinear effects, we present the analyses without the quadratic variables here.

  3. The Sobel Test is appropriate given that we do not estimate random coefficients for the path linking stressor source to perceptions of control (Bauer et al. 2006).

References

  • Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S. (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alge, B. J., Anthony, E. L., Rees, J., & Kannan, K. (2010). Controlling A, while hoping for B: Deviance deterrence and public versus private deviance. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), The dark side of management (pp. 115–141). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, V. L., & Greenberger, D. B. (1980). Destruction and perceived control. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Applications of personal control (pp. 85–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrend, T., Sharek, D., Meade, A., & Wiebe, E. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, 800–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J. (1998). Perceived powerlessness as a cause of employee deviance. In R. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelley, & J. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional workplace behavior (pp. 221–239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246–260). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmeister, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Phillips, C. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2012). Employee selection as a control system. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 931–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1992). Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., & Turan, N. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behavior from guilt proneness. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millenium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLongis, A., & Holtzman, S. (2005). Coping in context: The role of stress, social support, and personality in coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1633–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, K. E., & Barling, J. (2006). Predicting and preventing supervisory workplace aggression. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, K. E., Barling, J., & LeBlanc, M. M. (2005). The many faces of control at work. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of stress, medicine and health (pp. 375–398). London: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (1988). The determinants and consequences of coping with stress. In C. L. Cooper & S. C. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (pp. 233–263). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (2008). Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 145–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23, 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfering, A., Grebner, S., Semmer, N., Kaiser-Freiburghaus, D., Lauper-Del Ponte, S., & Witschi, I. (2005). Chronic job stressors and job control: Effects on event-related coping success and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2005). Beyond counterproductive work behavior: Moral emotions and deontic retaliation versus reconciliation. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 83–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: A study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Spector, P. (1999). A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (2006). The many roles of control in a stressor-emotion theory of counterproductive work behavior. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being: Employee health, coping and methodologies (Vol. 5, pp. 171–201). Bingly: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, T., Chi, N., & Lu, W. (2009). Exploring the relationships between perceived coworker loafing and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of a revenge motive. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krischer, M. M., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E. M. (2010). Can counterproductive work behaviors Be productive? CWB as emotion-focused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, V. C. S., Au, W. T., & Ho, J. M. C. (2003). A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. The American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., Harter, J. K., & Lavuer, K. J. (2010). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, K. J., & Bailey, J. J. (1999). The effects of transgressor sex on judgments of unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1994). A policy capturing approach to individuals’ decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 358–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In O. P. John, R. W. Robbins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 208–241). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1148–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social psychological perspective. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. E., Jose, P. E., & Brough, P. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science (September), 833–848.

  • Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 777–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2008). Emotions and counterproductive work behavior. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (pp. 183–196). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, R., & Latham, L. L. (1993). Relationship of client abuse with locus of control and gender: A longitudinal study in mental retardation facilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 831–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. H., & O’Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influences of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C., Shoss, M. K., & Jundt, D. K. (2015). In the eye of the beholder: A multi-stakeholder perspective of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 25, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenburg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S., & Zagenczyk, T. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Introduction to multilevel analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior. Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., & Domagalski, T. (2006a). Emotions, violence and counterproductive work behavior. In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling, & J. Hurrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 29–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P., Fox, S., Penney, L., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006b). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprung, J. M., & Jex, S. M. (2012). Work locus of control as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 19, 272–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eerde, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, M. V., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Holmes, O. (2014). Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 38–53.

  • Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62, 259–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, 63103, USA

    Mindy K. Shoss, Dustin K. Jundt, Allison Kobler & Clair Reynolds

Authors
  1. Mindy K. Shoss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dustin K. Jundt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Allison Kobler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clair Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mindy K. Shoss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shoss, M.K., Jundt, D.K., Kobler, A. et al. Doing Bad to Feel Better? An Investigation of Within- and Between-Person Perceptions of Counterproductive Work Behavior as a Coping Tactic. J Bus Ethics 137, 571–587 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2573-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2573-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation