Skip to main content
Log in

Metanalysis of the efficacy of metacognitive therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive intrusion

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) are well-established treatments with scientific underpinnings. When focusing on the processes, we may contend that these two therapies share certain common denominators and it might be hypothesized that both therapies favor processes of habituation to intrusion, and this may give rise to the high efficacy both therapies reveal in problems involving high intrusion. The Objective is to compare the impact of MCT and ACT on cognitive intrusion according to the studies identified in a systematic review conducted accordingly. This study is a comparation of included original reports in papers on the use of MCT and ACT for treating GAD and OCD published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Only those papers were used in which the participants were assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS; Goodman et al., 1989) and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990), as the main instruments for evaluating the cognitive symptoms of these disorders. Of the 1111 studies selected, 18 met all the review criteria and were therefore included. Our results reveal that MCT records better results than ACT. In conclusion, this may be because a better understanding of the workings of cognition may reduce the sense of threat, and therefore favor processes of habituation and greater acceptance and tolerance of the symptoms, thereby reducing a person’s distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Sánchez Escamilla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The ethics committee of the Camilo José Cela University granted exemption from requiring ethics approval, since there is no experimental manipulation in this article. Even so, each review article that meets the necessary ethical conditions has been reviewed, complying with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later addenda.

Informed consent

This article does not require informed consent as it is a meta-analysis article. The participants of the investigations that are included in this article did sign an informed consent in the article where they were published.

Publicly available dataset

The data reported in this manuscript were obtained from publicly available data, of included original reports in papers on the use of MCT and ACT for treating GAD and OCD published in English in peer-reviewed journals. The variables and relationships examined in the present article have not been examined in any previous or current articles, or to the best of our knowledge in any papers that will be under review soon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez Escamilla, F., Redondo Delgado, M., Herrero, L. et al. Metanalysis of the efficacy of metacognitive therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive intrusion. Curr Psychol 43, 8149–8157 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05001-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05001-5

Keywords

Navigation