Skip to main content
Log in

Irrelevant angry, but not happy, faces facilitate response inhibition in mindfulness meditators

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness enhances executive control and regulates emotion, but the role of mindfulness in response inhibition in emotional contexts remains unclear. The present study used a stop-signal task to investigate the interactive effect of mindfulness, response inhibition, and emotions. Individuals with prior experience in mindfulness meditation and no meditation experience participated in the study. In the stop-signal task, participants responded to the target stimulus using keypress on go trials and inhibited the response on stop trials. On each trial, an emotional face (prime; angry, happy, or neutral) preceded the target stimulus, but they were instructed to ignore the face. After the task, participants filled out self-report scales associated with attention and awareness, affect, mood, and impulsivity. No group differences were found on any self-report measure. The task results showed that happy face primes enhanced response inhibition in non-meditators, whereas angry face primes enhanced response inhibition in mindfulness meditators. The results are explained through functional perspectives of how mindfulness influences attentional resource deployment to emotional stimuli, affecting response processes over time. The study demonstrates the existence of emotional asymmetry in the inhibitory process arising from mindfulness practice. The findings contribute to understanding the temporally dynamic patterns through which mindfulness modulates the attention-emotion interface to promote meaning in the face of difficulty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ubNxFb8kg5Pu1eGomovmWC1XFVQr65prGTQD9dodfg4/edit?usp=sharing

Notes

  1. Regarding SSRT, please note that there were forty-eight stop trials in the task. Dividing them gender-wise into male and female targets would reduce it to 24 stop trials/gender. Further emotion-wise division (angry, happy, neutral) would leave us with only eight stop trials in each valence condition for male and female targets. SSDs and SSRT estimations from such a small number of stop trials would give weak and misleading results with the current design of the stop-signal task, which precluded us from performing the analysis.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the IRCC, IITB seed grant (RD/0518-IRCCSH0-013) to Prof. Gupta and the University Grant Commission (378/(NET-NOV2017)) to Ms. Surabhi Lodha. We thank Mr. Shubham Pandey for his help with data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.L. and R.G. conceived the experiment, S.L. conducted the experiment, S.L. and R.G. analyzed the results. Both authors contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashmi Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Human research participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lodha, S., Gupta, R. Irrelevant angry, but not happy, faces facilitate response inhibition in mindfulness meditators. Curr Psychol 43, 811–826 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04384-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04384-9

Navigation