Skip to main content
Log in

Peer status buffers the detrimental Effects of peer victimization on School Burnout among chinese adolescents via negative cognition

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 March 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The primary objective of this two-wave longitudinal study was to determine whether peer status or negative cognition could account for the well-established relationships between peer victimization and school burnout. In total, 655 students from two junior high schools (Mage = 12.7 years) were assessed at two time points over a 12-month interval. Baseline measures included self-reported and peer-nominated peer victimization, self-reported negative cognition and school burnout, and peer-nominated peer status. After one year, school burnout was again measured. Using a longitudinal mediating model, it was found that adolescents who perceived peer victimization at baseline were more likely to experience school burnout one year later owing to increased elevated negative cognition (mediation effect β = 0.09, 95% bias-corrected bootstrap = [0.06–0.14]). This effect was also moderated by peer status, such that among adolescents with lower peer status, baseline peer victimization was associated with significantly higher rates of school burnout after 12 months (β = 0.22, p < .01), whereas the same was not true for those with high peer status. The current study will help educators better understand the potential mechanism by which they could alleviate adolescent student school burnout by reducing the cognitive bias of bullied adolescents with poor peer status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Western Project of National Social Fund [grant number 21XSH012], the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities [social development and education of children], the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Shaanxi Province, China [grant number 20J2035], the Shaanxi Social Science Fund, China [grant number 2018Q11], and the Research Foundation of Sports Bureau of Shaanxi Provincial, China [grant number 2020173].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Caina Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Di Guo and both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caina Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of both authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures carried out in research involving human subjects followed the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later revisions or corresponding ethical standards, as well as the ethical requirements of the institutional and/or national research committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised, Funding note has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, D., Li, C. Peer status buffers the detrimental Effects of peer victimization on School Burnout among chinese adolescents via negative cognition. Curr Psychol 42, 29061–29069 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03867-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03867-5

Keywords

Navigation