Abstract
Although taboo words are by definition aversive and offensive, they are nevertheless ubiquitous across languages. However, the consequences of taboo language on cognitive processes, such as reading, are generally not understood. Typically, when readers pronounce an unknown word, that word’s orthographic similarity to known words leads to a similar pronunciation. Here we ask how taboo language affects this link between orthography and phonology in reading and pronunciation. In the current experiment, participants read aloud novel words that were either orthographic neighbors to taboo words or to frequency matched non-taboo words. Overall, participants were less accurate in pronouncing novel words with taboo neighbors than those with non-taboo neighbors. However, we also found individual differences such that participants who self-reported swearing frequently were not affected by the taboo-ness of known neighbors. Together the results suggest that taboo language has top-down influences on the reading and pronunciation of novel words.
Data Availability
The experiment reported in this article was not formally preregistered. All data and R analysis code are available on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/rkq2y/.
Notes
Based on similar low-frequency word reading tasks with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d 0.7–2.4; e.g., n = 40, Strain et al., 1995).
References
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bergen, B. (2016). What the F: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves. Basic Books.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e43230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T., & Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(5), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90791-5
R Core Team. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
Reppen, R., Ide, N., & Suderman, K. (2005). American National Corpus (ANC) Second Release [DVD].
Samuel, A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12(4), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00364
Siegrist, M. (1995). Effects of taboo words on color-naming performance on a stroop test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(3_suppl), 1119–1122. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1119
Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21(5), 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1140
Sulpizio, S., Pennucci, E., & Job, R. (2021). The impact of emotional content on pseudoword recognition. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 85(8), 2980–2996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01454-6
Wurm, L., Vakoch, D., Aycock, J., & Childers, R. (2003). Semantic effects in lexical access: Evidence from single-word naming. Cognition and Emotion, 17(4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302302
Acknowledgements
The authors have no conflict of interest and no funding to report. We thank the members of Object and Word Learning Lab for help in data collection and the members of the Language Learning and Development Lab for help in coding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript and share joint first authorship. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statements and declarations
The authors have no competing relevant interests or funding to disclose.
Ethics
All study protocols were approved by the IRB at and complied to the ethical standards of APA, the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and the Belmont Report.
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants to participate and use anonymized data in publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sarah C. Kucker and Lynn K. Perry contributed equally to the manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kucker, S.C., Perry, L.K. When reading is harder than a mother kucker: The effect of orthographic neighbor taboo-ness on novel word pronunciation. Curr Psychol 42, 28895–28899 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03820-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03820-6