Abstract
We examined how abusive supervision (AS) affected instigated workplace incivility, counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs), organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), and multidimensional work motivations (MWMs), in line with the Job Demands-Resources Model and Social Exchange Theory. We suggested that employees' identification with their workgroup moderates the link between AS and instigated incivility toward coworkers and that organizational identification partially mediates the association of AS with CWBs and OCBs. Furthermore, we hypothesized positive correlations between AS and external regulation as well as amotivation, consistent with the Self-Determination Theory. Finally, we predicted that job-related affective well-being would fully mediate the link between AS and autonomous work motivations while only partially mediating the link between AS and amotivation. Online surveys were used to collect data from 519 white-collar workers. The data revealed that AS was linked to a higher level of incivility toward coworkers. Furthermore, it was linked to both CWBs and OCBs, both directly and indirectly through organizational identification. Organizational identification mediated the associations between AS and MWMs as well. Finally, job-related affective well-being mediated the links of AS with external regulation, amotivation, and autonomous work motivations. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
Following Trizano-Hermosilla and Alvarado’s (2016) suggestion that omega coefficient is always a better choice than Cronbach’s alpha, rather than reporting Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, we reported the omega coefficients in the manuscript.
References
Aquino, K., Douglas, S., & Martinko, M. J. (2004). Overt anger in response to victimization: Attributional style and organizational norms as moderators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.152
Arvey, R. W., Renz, G. L., & Watson, T. W. (1998). Emotionality and job performance: Implications for personnel selection. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 103–147. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07427301.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.
Bayazıt, M., Aycan, Z., Aksoy, E. Göncü, A., & Öztekin, T. (2006). Contextual performance: Antecedents and motivational processes operating among blue-collar employees. Paper presented at 10th ISSWOV International Conference on Work Values and Behavior, Tallinn, Estonia, June 2006.
Blau, G., & Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26822
Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. Wiley. ISBN: 9780887386282.
Breaux, D. M., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808321787
Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1991). Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.398
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Foulk, T. A., Lanaj, K., Tu, M. H., Erez, A., & Archambeau, L. (2018). Heavy is the head that wears the crown: An actor-centric approach to daily psychological power, abusive leader behavior, and perceived incivility. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1061
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gagné, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J., & Koestner, R. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organizational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 219–241. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., & Halvari, H. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Gök, S., Karatuna, I., & Başol, O. (2019). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the workplace incivility scale. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120181128m000009
Göncü, A., Aycan, Z., & Johnson, R. E. (2014). Effects of paternalistic and transformational leadership on follower outcomes. International Journal of Management and Business, 5(1), 36–58. https://www.iamb.net/IJMB/index.html.
Göncü-Köse, A. & Öztaylan, B. (2018). Dindarlık tipleri, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve üretim karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki ilişkiler. In A. Acaravcı (Ed.), Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimlere Dair Araştırma Örnekleri. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Academic Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/4103
Göncü-Köse, A., & Metin, U. B. (2019). Hangi Lider, Kurumda Kalmayı Nasıl Sağlıyor? Çok Boyutlu İş Motivasyonunun Aracı Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34, 46–70. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320190402x000031
Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., Kernan, M. C., Becker, T. E., & Eisenberger, R. (2018). Defeating abusive supervision: Training supervisors to support subordinates. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000061
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
He, Q., Wu, M., Wu, W., & Fu, J. (2021). The Effect of abusive supervision on employees’ work procrastination behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 113.
Hebda, J. M., Vojak, B. A., Griffin, A., & Price, R. L. (2007). Motivating technical visionaries in large American companies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 433–444.
Holm, K., Torkelson, E., & Bäckström, M. (2015). Models of workplace incivility: The relationships to instigated incivility and negative outcomes. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2015, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/920239
Hoobler, J. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125
Hwang, J., & Jang, W. (2020). The effects of job characteristics on perceived organizational identification and job satisfaction of the Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games employees. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(4), 290–306.
Johnson, P. R., & Indvik, J. (2001). Rudeness at work: Impulse over restraint. Public Personnel Management, 30(4), 457–465.
Lam, C. K. (2016). Stress intervention, supervisors’ emotional exhaustion, abusive supervision, and team performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 15373. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2193
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., Morrison, R., & Brown, D. J. (2014). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 651.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732
Mawritz, M. B., Dust, S. B., & Resick, C. J. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
Öcel, H. (2010). Üretim karşıtı iş davranışları ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13(26), 18–26. ISBN: 1301–9961.
Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00019-X
Peng, A. C., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Li, Y. (2014). Social exchange implications of own and coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1385–1405. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0080
Pinder, C. C. (1998). Motivation in work organizations. Upper Saddle River. ISBN: 0023956224, 9780023956225.
Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x
Restubog, S. L. D., Scott, K. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
Rockmann, K. W., & Ballinger, G. A. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and organizational identification among on-demand workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1305–1316.
Ronen, S., & Donia, M. B. (2020). Stifling my fire: The impact of abusive supervision on employees’ motivation and ensuing outcomes at work. Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo y De Las Organizaciones, 36(3), 205–214.
Rosen, C. C., Koopman, J., Gabriel, A. S., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Uncivil behaviour in the workplace causes mental fatigue and is contagious. LSE Business Review, 1–4. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781–790.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (p. 151–174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007.
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16.
Tavares, S. M., van Knippenberg, D., & Van Dick, R. (2016). Organizational identification and “currencies of exchange”: Integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(1), 34–45.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.974
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003
Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769.
Ülbeği, İ. D., Özgen, H. M., & Özgen, H. (2014). Türkiye’de istismarcı yönetim ölçeğinin uyarlaması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cusosbil/issue/32277/353140.
Uncu, Y., Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2007). Job-related affective well-being among primary health care physicians. European Journal of Public Health, 17(5), 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckl264
Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (1999). Job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS).https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219
Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474–2497.
Zhou, Z. E., Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2019). The spillover effects of coworker, supervisor, and outsider workplace incivility on work-to-family conflict: A weekly diary design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9–10), 1000–1012.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Social Sciences and Humanities Ethics Committee of the Çankaya University.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study is a part of Sami Okan Onaran’s Master of Science thesis completed under the supervision of Assoc. Prof. Aslı Göncü-Köse.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onaran, S.O., Göncü-Köse, A. Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation. Curr Psychol 42, 19881–19893 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03128-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03128-5