Skip to main content
Log in

Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined how abusive supervision (AS) affected instigated workplace incivility, counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs), organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), and multidimensional work motivations (MWMs), in line with the Job Demands-Resources Model and Social Exchange Theory. We suggested that employees' identification with their workgroup moderates the link between AS and instigated incivility toward coworkers and that organizational identification partially mediates the association of AS with CWBs and OCBs. Furthermore, we hypothesized positive correlations between AS and external regulation as well as amotivation, consistent with the Self-Determination Theory. Finally, we predicted that job-related affective well-being would fully mediate the link between AS and autonomous work motivations while only partially mediating the link between AS and amotivation. Online surveys were used to collect data from 519 white-collar workers. The data revealed that AS was linked to a higher level of incivility toward coworkers. Furthermore, it was linked to both CWBs and OCBs, both directly and indirectly through organizational identification. Organizational identification mediated the associations between AS and MWMs as well. Finally, job-related affective well-being mediated the links of AS with external regulation, amotivation, and autonomous work motivations. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Following Trizano-Hermosilla and Alvarado’s (2016) suggestion that omega coefficient is always a better choice than Cronbach’s alpha, rather than reporting Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, we reported the omega coefficients in the manuscript.

References

  • Aquino, K., Douglas, S., & Martinko, M. J. (2004). Overt anger in response to victimization: Attributional style and organizational norms as moderators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. W., Renz, G. L., & Watson, T. W. (1998). Emotionality and job performance: Implications for personnel selection. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 103–147. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07427301.

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayazıt, M., Aycan, Z., Aksoy, E. Göncü, A., & Öztekin, T. (2006). Contextual performance: Antecedents and motivational processes operating among blue-collar employees. Paper presented at 10th ISSWOV International Conference on Work Values and Behavior, Tallinn, Estonia, June 2006.

  • Blau, G., & Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. Wiley. ISBN: 9780887386282.

  • Breaux, D. M., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808321787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1991). Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foulk, T. A., Lanaj, K., Tu, M. H., Erez, A., & Archambeau, L. (2018). Heavy is the head that wears the crown: An actor-centric approach to daily psychological power, abusive leader behavior, and perceived incivility. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J., & Koestner, R. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organizational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 219–241. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., & Halvari, H. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gök, S., Karatuna, I., & Başol, O. (2019). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the workplace incivility scale. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120181128m000009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göncü, A., Aycan, Z., & Johnson, R. E. (2014). Effects of paternalistic and transformational leadership on follower outcomes. International Journal of Management and Business5(1), 36–58. https://www.iamb.net/IJMB/index.html.

  • Göncü-Köse, A. & Öztaylan, B. (2018). Dindarlık tipleri, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve üretim karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki ilişkiler. In A. Acaravcı (Ed.), Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimlere Dair Araştırma Örnekleri. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Academic Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/4103

  • Göncü-Köse, A., & Metin, U. B. (2019). Hangi Lider, Kurumda Kalmayı Nasıl Sağlıyor? Çok Boyutlu İş Motivasyonunun Aracı Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34, 46–70. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320190402x000031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., Kernan, M. C., Becker, T. E., & Eisenberger, R. (2018). Defeating abusive supervision: Training supervisors to support subordinates. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Q., Wu, M., Wu, W., & Fu, J. (2021). The Effect of abusive supervision on employees’ work procrastination behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebda, J. M., Vojak, B. A., Griffin, A., & Price, R. L. (2007). Motivating technical visionaries in large American companies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, K., Torkelson, E., & Bäckström, M. (2015). Models of workplace incivility: The relationships to instigated incivility and negative outcomes. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2015, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/920239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoobler, J. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., & Jang, W. (2020). The effects of job characteristics on perceived organizational identification and job satisfaction of the Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games employees. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(4), 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. R., & Indvik, J. (2001). Rudeness at work: Impulse over restraint. Public Personnel Management, 30(4), 457–465.

  • Lam, C. K. (2016). Stress intervention, supervisors’ emotional exhaustion, abusive supervision, and team performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 15373. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., Morrison, R., & Brown, D. J. (2014). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mawritz, M. B., Dust, S. B., & Resick, C. J. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öcel, H. (2010). Üretim karşıtı iş davranışları ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları13(26), 18–26. ISBN: 1301–9961.

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00019-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, A. C., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Li, Y. (2014). Social exchange implications of own and coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1385–1405. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (1998). Motivation in work organizations. Upper Saddle River. ISBN: 0023956224, 9780023956225.

  • Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Scott, K. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockmann, K. W., & Ballinger, G. A. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and organizational identification among on-demand workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1305–1316.

  • Ronen, S., & Donia, M. B. (2020). Stifling my fire: The impact of abusive supervision on employees’ motivation and ensuing outcomes at work. Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo y De Las Organizaciones, 36(3), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Koopman, J., Gabriel, A. S., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Uncivil behaviour in the workplace causes mental fatigue and is contagious. LSE Business Review, 1–4. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781–790.

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (p. 151–174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007.

  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16.

  • Tavares, S. M., van Knippenberg, D., & Van Dick, R. (2016). Organizational identification and “currencies of exchange”: Integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ülbeği, İ. D., Özgen, H. M., & Özgen, H. (2014). Türkiye’de istismarcı yönetim ölçeğinin uyarlaması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi23(1), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cusosbil/issue/32277/353140.

  • Uncu, Y., Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2007). Job-related affective well-being among primary health care physicians. European Journal of Public Health, 17(5), 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckl264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (1999). Job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS).https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219

  • Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474–2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. E., Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2019). The spillover effects of coworker, supervisor, and outsider workplace incivility on work-to-family conflict: A weekly diary design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9–10), 1000–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aslı Göncü-Köse.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Social Sciences and Humanities Ethics Committee of the Çankaya University.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study is a part of Sami Okan Onaran’s Master of Science thesis completed under the supervision of Assoc. Prof. Aslı Göncü-Köse.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 17692 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onaran, S.O., Göncü-Köse, A. Mediating processes in the relationships of abusive supervision with instigated incivility, CWBs, OCBs, and multidimensional work motivation. Curr Psychol 42, 19881–19893 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03128-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03128-5

Keywords

Navigation