Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The unique practices of workplace bullying in academe: An exploratory study

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades there has been a growing interest in workplace bullying in academe, and studies show that it is on the rise. The current study sought to explore the unique bullying methods and practices enacted in academe, and to estimate their prevalence. A preliminary study yielded 23 academic bullying methods, which constituted the basis for constructing a study questionnaire; we also included questions about the organizational culture in the institution where each respondent works and Big Five personality traits of respondents. Respondents were also encouraged to describe their specific experiences of being bullied. Participants were 328 faculty members from academic institutions around the state of Israel and of various academic ranks who completed our study questionnaire. The 23 bullying methods were classified into three categories by means of exploratory factor analysis as follows: humiliation; exploitation of status; and obstruction of promotion. Participants were also asked to mark what emotional, cognitive, physical, and medical self-reported consequences they suffer as a result of the bullying. We present these disturbing results as well as the self-reported adverse consequences to the victims. Participants working in institutions characterized by a clan organizational culture are less likely to experience academic bullying of all three types. Women report higher levels of humiliation and promotion obstruction as compared to the men. Untenured faculty suffer significantly higher levels of humiliation and exploitation of status than their tenured counterparts. We provide sample quotations of answers written by some of the many respondents who shared with us cases of bullying. We discuss these results and provide some practical recommendations to act against academic bullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available from the corresponding author (YBC) upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

N/a

References

  • Ahmad, S., Kalim, R., & Kaleem, A. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of bullying at work: Insights from Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D. (1999). Exploring “bullying” culture in a para-military organization. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1– 2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268687.

  • Averbuch, T., Eliya, Y., & Van Spall, H. G. C. (2021). Systematic review of academic bullying in medical settings: Dynamics and consequences. BMJ Open, 11(7), e043256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, P. (2012). A phenomenological investigation of experiences regarding workplace bullying in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, .

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.) Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2014). The dark side of the ivory tower: Cyberbullying of university faculty and teaching personnel. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60, 279–299.

  • Cassidy, W., Jackson, M., & Faucher, C. (2016). Gender differences and cyberbullying towards faculty members in higher education. In Cyberbullying across the globe (pp. 79–98). Springer, .

  • Coyne, L., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200417957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2014). Compensation criteria in higher education in Israel and elsewhere: Evaluation of research and teaching outcomes. Journal of International Education Research, 10(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v10i4.8867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitch, N., Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Iram, Y. (2013). Paradoxes in higher education: Universities versus academic colleges. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.2.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DelliFraine, J. L., McClelland, L. E., Erwin, C. O., & Wang, Z. (2014). Bullying in academia: Results of a survey of health administration faculty. Journal of Health Administration Education, 31(2), 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhaus, E., & Davidovitch, N. (2019). How do academic faculty members perceive the effect of teaching surveys completed by students on appointment and promotion processes at academic institutions? A case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Hoel, H. (2001). The negative acts questionnaire: Development, validation and revision of a measure of bullying at work. 10th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology, Prague.

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence & Victims, 12(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.12.3.247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329408410497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, C., Semmer, N. K., Sauter, S., Walker, A., de Wijn, N., Kälin, W., Kotwitz, M., Kersten, B., Ulrich, B., & Elfering, A. (2021). How are social stressors at work related to well-being and health? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10894-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, G. (2012). Workplace bullying in academia creates a negative work environment: An Italian study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24(4), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9193-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasø, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gül, H., İnce, M., & Özcan, N. (2011). The relationship between workplace mobbing and burnout among academics at a Turkish university. Research Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 118–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, T., & Bosetti, L. (2021). Incivility: The new type of bullying in higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1897524

  • Hodgins, M., & McNamara, P. M. (2019). An enlightened environment? Workplace bullying and incivility in Irish higher education. Sage Open, 9(4), 1-13. 10.1177/2158244019894278.

  • Hoprekstad, Ø. L., Hetland, J., & Einarsen, S. V. (2021). Exposure to negative acts at work and self-labelling as a victim of workplace bullying: The role of prior victimization from bullying. Current Psychology, 1–17.

  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol 2., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.

  • Keashly, L. (2021). Workplace bullying, mobbing and harassment in academe: Faculty experience. Special topics and particular occupations, professions and sectors, pp. 221–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5154-8_13-1.

  • Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2010). Faculty experiences with bullying in higher education: Causes, consequences, and management. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806320103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2013). Bullying in higher education. Workplace Bullying in Higher Education, 1-22.

  • Keashly, L., & Wajngurt, C. (2016). Faculty bullying in higher education. Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 53, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampman, C. (2012). Women faculty at risk: US professors report on their experiences with student incivility, bullying, aggression, and sexual attention. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/njawhe-2012-1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampman, C., Crew, E. C., Lowery, S. D., & Tompkins, K. (2016). Women faculty distressed: Descriptions and consequences of academic contrapower harassment. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 9(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2016.1199385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, L. S., Poyser, C., & Butterworth, P. (2017). Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: A systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 74(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2016.1199385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levav, G. B. (2018). Why do academics apply for research Grants? (Doctoral dissertation, ).

  • Lou, S. L. (2021). Toxic Friday: Resources for addressing faculty bullying in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 35(1), 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudi, M., & Keashly, L. (2021). Filling the space: A framework for coordinated global actions to diminish academic bullying. Angewandte Chemie, 133(7), 3378–3384. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202009270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R., Arnold, D. H., Fratzl, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Workplace bullying in academia: A Canadian study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-008-9073-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., Miller, V., Marchel, C., Moro, R., Kaplan, B., Clark, C., & Musilli, S. (2019). Academic violence/bullying: Application of Bandura’s eight moral disengagement strategies to higher education. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 31(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-018-9327-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misawa, M. (2015). Cuts and bruises caused by arrows, sticks, and stones in academia: Theorizing three types of racist and homophobic bullying in adult and higher education. Adult Learning, 26, 6–13. 10.1177%2F1045159514558413.

  • Navayan, P. K., & Chitale, C. M. (2016). A study of nature and prevalence of mobbing amongst teachers in higher education in Pune. KHOJ: Journal of Indian Management Research and Practices, (National Research Conference Special Issue), 297-312.

  • Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. V. (2020). Methodological issues in the measurement of workplace bullying. In Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 235-265). CRC Press.

  • Nielsen, M. B., Pallesen, S., Einarsen, S. V., Harris, A., Rajalingam, D., & Gjerstad, J. (2021). Associations between exposure to workplace bullying and insomnia: A cross-lagged prospective study of causal directions. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01618-2.

  • Nikpay, I., & Zand Karimi, M. (2019). The impact of authentic leadership on organizational bullying with the mediating role of organizational culture. Organizational Culture Management, 17(2), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.22059/jomc.2019.238390.1007301

  • Pheko, M. M. (2018). Autoethnography and cognitive adaptation: Two powerful buffers against the negative consequences of workplace bullying and academic mobbing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1459134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1459134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pheko, M. M., Monteiro, N. M., & Segopolo, M. T. (2017). When work hurts: A conceptual framework explaining how organizational culture may perpetuate workplace bullying. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(6), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1300973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, I., & Turska, E. (2015). Relationships between Machiavellianism, organizational culture, and workplace bullying: Emotional abuse from the target’s and the perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, C., & King, C. (2016). The enigma of adult bullying in higher education: A research-based conceptual framework. Education, 136(3), 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, C., & Hunt, E. (2018). Bullying and mobbing in academe: A literature review. European Scientific Journal, 14(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n8p1.

  • Qureshi, M. I., Rasli, A. M., & Zaman, K. (2014). A new trilogy to understand the relationship among organizational climate, workplace bullying and employee health. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 9(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, L. (2016). The effects of bullying on emotional well-being as described by non-tenured university faculty: A qualitative inquiry [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University].

  • Robinson, E., Hull, L., & Petrides, K. V. (2020). Big five model and trait emotional intelligence in camouflaging behaviours in autism. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035610003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2021). Workplace bullying and gender: An overview of empirical findings. In P. D’Cruz , E. Noronha , C. Caponecchio , J. Escartin , D. Salin & M. R. Tuckey (Eds) , Dignity and inclusion at work (pp. 331–361). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5338-2_12-1.

  • Singh, К. (2017). Measurement and assessment of bullying behaviours in departments and affiliated colleges of University of Delhi. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 809–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2013). Workplace bullying: Does tenure change anything?: The example of a Midwestern research university. In J. Lester (Ed.), Workplace bullying in higher education (pp. 23–40). Routledge.

  • Twale, D. J. (2018). Understanding and preventing faculty-on-faculty bullying: A psycho-social organizational approach. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, H. R., El-Houfey, A. A., & Elserogy, Y. M. (2013). Mobbing behaviors against demonstrators and assistant lecturers working at Assiut University. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 901–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268669

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the directors of the Academic College of Israel in Ramat-Gan for the funding of this research project.

Funding

This study received funding from the Academic College of Israel in Ramat-Gan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya’arit Bokek-Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Consent to Participate

All study participants expressed an informed consent to participate in the study by signing at the beginning a statement attached to the study.

Consent for Publication

All study participants expressed an informed consent to have their answers included in statistical analyses to be published in academic articles by signing at the beginning a statement attached to the study.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 8 Demographical characteristics of the sample

Appendix 2

Profiling Bullying Factors

Table 9 MANCOVA descriptive statistics and statistical tests for dispositional/personality profiling
Table 10 MANCOVA descriptive statistics and statistical tests for organizational culture profiling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bokek-Cohen, Y., Shkoler, O. & Meiri, E. The unique practices of workplace bullying in academe: An exploratory study. Curr Psychol 42, 19466–19485 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03090-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03090-2

Keywords

Navigation