Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceiving power: A study of spatial relations as perceptual symbols

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Perky Effect (from Perky, 1910) broadly concerns the interaction of imagined and perceived stimuli. Typically this interaction has been interference, although some recent research has suggested language evoked spatial representations could actually facilitate perceptual task performance at corresponding spatial locations. The current study explored whether comprehending language interfered with or facilitated the perceptual task at the implied spatial locations as a matter of language length. In Study 1, participants read power words followed by a figure recognition task that appeared at either the upper or lower part of the screen. It was found comprehending power words interfered with perception of the visual stimulus at the implied spatial locations. Study 2 used the same paradigm but with power sentences. We failed to observe the interaction between the power sentences and the visual figure spatial location. The combined results of Study 1 and Study 2 suggest that the spatial mental representations of language are consistent with past perceptual research on the Perky Effect, but only as a short-lived phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, B., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 733–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102, 476–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craver-Lemley, C., & Arterberry, M. E. (2001). Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. Spatial Vision, 14, 101–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craver-Lemley, C., & Reeves, A. (1987). Visual imagery selectively reduces Vernier acuity. Perception, 16, 599–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craver-Lemley, C., & Reeves, A. (1992). How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychological Review, 99, 633–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, Z., Verges, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects’ typical location. Psychological Science, 19, 93–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Z. (2018). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 61(6), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701623605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1997). Visual imagery facilitates visual perception: Psychophysical evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 476–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, M., & Henley, T. (2012). Power: Spatial relations as perceptual symbols. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Formerly: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology), 24, 829–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

  • Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, N. J., & Langford, T. (1994). The meaning of occupational prestige scores: A social psychological analysis and interpretation. The Sociological Quarterly, 35, 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanay, B., Brown, R., & Brown, R. (2015). Perceptual content and the content of mental imagery. Philosophical Studies, 172(7), 1723–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perky, C. W. (1910). An experimental study of imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 422–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, A., & Craver-Lemley, C. (2012). Unmasking the Perky effect: Spatial extent of image interference on visual acuity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, A., Grayhem, R., & Craver-Lemley, C. (2020). The Perky effect revisited: Imagery hinders perception at high levels, but aids it at low. Vision Research (Oxford), 167, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, S. (2017). Object recognition in mental representations: Directions for exploring diagnostic features through visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. D. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-readable dictionary, Version 2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20(1), 6–11.

  • Zwaan, R. A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2008). Language in the brain, body, and world. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 368–381). Cambridge University Press.

  • Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, USA

    Mei Jiang & Tracy Henley

Authors
  1. Mei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy Henley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed were in accordance and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and ethical approval was obtained from Texas A&M University-Commerce Institutional Review Board (Reference number: #2008–001).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, M., Henley, T. Perceiving power: A study of spatial relations as perceptual symbols. Curr Psychol 42, 3559–3566 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01713-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01713-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation