Abstract
Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is a basic trait to describe individual differences in sensitivity and reactivity to environmental stimuli. Studies in Western countries have suggested that people fall into the three sensitivity groups, namely high-, medium-, and low-SPS groups and explored their characteristics. This study investigated whether the results found in Western studies can be replicated in Japanese samples. Two samples of Japanese university students, namely Sample A (n = 1257) and Sample B (n = 720), participated in a questionnaire-based survey. In both samples their SPS levels were assessed using the Japanese version of Highly Sensitive Person Scale. Additionally, only in Sample B their temperament and affect were assessed using the Japanese version of the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. A series of latent class analysis indicated that the three-class model fitted best with the data. Each group could be interpreted as a high-, medium-, and low-SPS group, respectively. Furthermore, the characteristics of each group were explored considering the levels of BIS/BAS and positive and negative affect. Analyses of variance suggested that each sensitivity group in the Japanese samples had similar characteristics as those in Western samples. Although several issues should be addressed, most of the findings from Western studies could be replicated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No applicable.
Code Availability
No applicable.
Notes
Cross Marketing Inc. is a company engaged mainly in marketing and academic research with headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. As of June 2020, they had about 4.6 million web survey monitors all over Japan. Many researchers have collaborated with Cross Marketing Inc. to conduct surveys (e.g., Ueno, Takahashi, & Oshio, 2019), showing that they have obtained high reliability in academic research. To investigate whether the results from the metropolitan sample (Sample A) could be generalizable to a nationwide sample, we asked Cross Marketing Inc. to collect the data.
This study also demonstrated that the bi-factor structure had better fit indices than the three-factor structure in HSPS-J19 (see Table S1).
Although the BAS scale originally comprised three subscales (i.e., reward responsiveness, drive, and fun seeking), this study defined the composite score of these subscales as the BAS score following Pluess et al.’s (2018) study.
References
Acevedo, B. P., Jagiellowicz, J., Aron, E. N., Marhenke, R., & Aron, A. (2017). Sensory processing sensitivity and childhood quality’s effects on neural responses to emotional stimuli. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14, 359–373.
Aron, E. N. (2010). Psychotherapy and the highly sensitive person: Improving outcomes for that minority of people who are the majority of clients. New York: Routledge.
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345–368.
Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262–282.
Assary, E., Zavos, H. M. S., Krapohl, E., Keers, R., & Pluess, M. (2020). Genetic architecture of environmental sensitivity reflects multiple heritable components: A twin study with adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0783-8.
Belsky, J. (1997). Variation in susceptibility to raring influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186.
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. an evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Developmental Psychology, 17, 271–301.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
Chen, X., Rubin, K., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336–1343.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Bunchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., Pluess, M., Bruining, H., Acevedo, B., Bijttebier, P., & Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305.
Harzing, A. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243–266.
Homberg, J. R., Shubert, D., Asan, E., & Aron, E. N. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity and serotonin gene variance: Insights into mechanisms shaping environmental sensitivity. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 71, 472–483.
Iimura, S., & Kibe, C. (2020). Highly sensitive adolescent benefits in positive school transitions: Evidence for vantage sensitivity in Japanese high-schoolers. Developmental Psychology, 56, 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000991.
Keers, R., Coleman, J. R. I., Lester, K. J., Roberts, S., Breen, G., Thastum, M., Bögels, S., Schneider, S., Heiervang, E., Meiser-Stedman, R., Nauta, M., Creswell, C., Thirlwall, K., Rapee, R. M., Hudson, J. L., Lewis, C., Plomin, R., & Eley, T. C. (2016). A genome-wide test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis reveals a genetic predictor of differential response to psychological treatments for child anxiety disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85, 146–158.
Licht, C. L., Mortensen, E. L., Hjordt, L. V., Stenbæk, D. S., Arentzen, T. E., Nørremølle, A., & Knudsen, G. M. (2020). Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) variation and sensory processing sensitivity: Comparison with other anxiety-related temperamental dimensions. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 8, e1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1352.
Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8, 24.
Lionetti, F., Pastore, M., Moscardino, U., Nocentini, A., Pluess, K., & Pluess, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152.
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83.
Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). London: Oxford University Press.
May, A. K., Norris, S. A., Richter, L. M., & Pitman, M. M. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale in ethnically and culturally heterogeneous south African samples. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00988-7.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (Eight ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Pluess, M. (2018). The personality trait of environmental sensitivity predicts children's positive response to school-based antibullying intervention. Clinical Psychology Sciences, 6, 848–859.
Pastore, M. (2018). Overlapping: A R package for estimating overlapping in empirical distributions. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(32), 1023.
Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 138–143.
Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the highly sensitive child scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54, 51–70.
Pluess, M., & Boniwell, I. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of vantage sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 40–45.
Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2020). People differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An integrated theory and empirical evidence. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w53yc. Accessed 29 December 2020.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2001). Development of the Japanese version of positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) scales. Japanese Journal of Personality, 9, 138–139 (In Japanese).
Selker, R., Love, J., & Dropmann, D. (2020). Package ‘jmv’: The ‘jamove’ analyses. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/jmv/jmv.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2020.
Shimizu, H. (2016). An introduction to the statistical free software HAD: Suggestions to improve teaching, learning and practice data analysis. Journal of Media, Information, and Communication, 1, 59–73 (In Japanese).
Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., Van Aken, M. A. G., Ellis, B. J., & Deković, M. (2018). Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Developmental Psychology, 54, 543–558.
Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “big five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269–1279.
Takahashi, A. (2016). Development of Japanese version of the 19-item highly sensitive person scale (HSPS-J19). Japanese Journal of Research on Emotions, 23, 68–77 (In Japanese).
Takahashi, Y., Yamagata, S., Kijima, N., Shigemasu, K., Ono, Y., & Ando, J. (2007). Gray’s temperament model: Development of Japanese version of BIS/BAS scales and a behavior genetic investigation using the twin method. Japanese Journal of Personality, 15, 276–289 (In Japanese).
Tillman, T., Bertrams, A., El Matany, K., & Lionetti, F. (2020). Replication of the existence of three sensitivity groups in a sample of German adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2009). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ueno, Y., Takahashi, A., & Oshio, A. (2019). Relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity and age in a large cross-sectional Japanese sample. Heliyon, 5, e02508.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Weyn, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Greven, C. U., Goossens, L., et al. (2019). Psychometric properties of the highly sensitive child scale across developmental stage, gender, and country. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00254-5.
Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for a data analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
Wolf, M., Van Doorn, G. S., & Weissing, F. J. (2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 15825–15830.
Yano, K., Kase, T., & Oishi, K. (2020a). Sensory processing sensitivity moderates the relationships between life skills and depressive tendencies in university students. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12289.
Yano, K., Kase, T., & Oishi, K. (2020b). The associations between sensory processing sensitivity and the big five personality traits in a Japanese sample. Journal of Individual Differences, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000332.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp/) for English-language editing.
Funding
This study was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number JP19J20902 for the first author (KY) and JP18K03079 for the last author (KO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KY developed the study outline, collected data, performed data analyses, and wrote the paper.
KO supervised the writing process and the study design.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the ethics review board of College of Community and Human Services, Rikkyo University (No. 2017–02, No. KOMI19014A).
Consent to Participate
All participants provided the consent before completing study survey.
Consent for Publication
The publication of collected data was approved by the ethics review board and all the participants.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 41 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yano, K., Oishi, K. Replication of the three sensitivity groups and investigation of their characteristics in Japanese samples. Curr Psychol 42, 1371–1380 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01537-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01537-6