Abstract
Moral reasoning is a field of investigation that has been raising more and more interest. It is necessary to have valid tools for evaluating moral reasoning. To this end, this article provides an update review about existing tools that evaluate moral reasoning, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties. In a literature review using the Web of Science, the scientific literature was reviewed between 1900 and 2017, focusing on the last 30 years. Three search processes were performed: an initial one to observe the current situation, a system applying inclusion-exclusion criteria, and a manual search to evaluate the obtained results. A total of 21 instruments were found that evaluate moral reasoning. Possible aspects of improvement in lines of future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1032–1037. https://doi.org/10.1038/14833.
Barque-Duran, A., Pothos, E., Hampton, J., & Yearsley, J. (2017). Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020.
Borenstein, J., Drake, M. J., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2010). The engineering and science issues test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(2), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z.
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.
Bravo, G., & Potvin, L. (1991). Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: Toward the integration of two traditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90076-L.
Bryant, B. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53, 413–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128984.
Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision making, 3(2), 121–139.
Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., & Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ Prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0204_3.
Chaar, B. B. (2009). Professional ethics in pharmacy practice: Developing a psychometric measure of moral reasoning. Pharmacy World & Science, 31(4), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-009-9320-1.
Chih-Feng, C., Ching-Jung, L., Brent, W., & Ching-Yieh, L. (2016). Measuring the moral reasoning competencies of service-learning e-tutors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 269–281.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgement: Volume 2, Standard Issue Scoring Manual (Vol. 2). Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.
Comunian, A. L. (2004). Construction of a scale for measuring development of moral judgement. Psychological Reports, 94(2), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.2.613-618.
Crutzen, R., & Peters, G. P. (2017). Scale quality: Alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psychology Review, 11(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1124240.
Cuñat-Agut, M., Martí-Vilar, M., & Suay, F. (2016). Brain structures involved in moral reasoning: A review. The International Journal of Psychosocial and Cultural Genomics, Consciousness & Health Research, 2(2), 38–54.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
de Vet, H. C. W., Mokkink, L. B., Mosmuller, D. G., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: Different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013.
Dedeke, A. (2015). A cognitive–intuitionist model of moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1965-y.
Dima, A. L. (2018). Scale validation in applied health research: Tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1472602.
Dooley, J. J., Beauchamp, M., & Anderson, V. A. (2010). The measurement of sociomoral reasoning in adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Impairment, 11(02), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.11.2.152.
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests, version 4.2.6.2013. Available online: http://www.efpa.eu/download/650d0d4ecd407a51139ca44ee704fda4 . Accessed 01/02/2020.
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Francis, K., Terbeck, S., Briazu, R., Haines, A., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., & Howard, I. (2017). Simulating moral actions: An investigation of personal force in virtual moral dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13909-9.
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0.
Green, S., & Yang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of dimensionality in the assessment of internal consistency reliability: Coefficient alpha and omega coefficient. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12100.
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872.
Gregoire, G., Derderian, F., & Le Lorier, J. (1995). Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-b.
Gump, L. S., Baker, R. C., & Roll, S. (2000). The moral justification scale: Reliability and validity of a new measure of care and justice orientations. Adolescence, 35(137), 67–76.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Editorial Harper Collins.
Henderson, L. (2005). Combining moral philosophy and moral reasoning: The PAVE moral reasoning strategy. International Education Journal, 6(2), 184–193.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory and research and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York, NY: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.
Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2009). Television and children's moral reasoning: Toward a closed-end measure of moral reasoning on interpersonal violence. Communications, 34, 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.019.
Leppink, J., & Pérez-Fuster, P. (2017). We need more replication research – A case for test-retest reliability. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0347-z.
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5.
Lind, G. (1978). Wie misst man moralisches Urteil? Probleme und alternative Möglichkeiten der Messung eines komplexen konstrukts [how does one measure moral judgment? Problems and alternative ways of measuring a complex construct]. In G. Portele (Ed.), Sozialisation und Moral (pp. 171–201). Weinhem: Beltz. Accessed 12/15/2019.
Lind, G. (1998). An introduction to the moral judgment test (MJT). Unpublished manuscript. Konstanz: University of Konstanz. Retrieved from http://www.uni-konstanz.de/ag-moral/pdf/MJT-introduction.PDF.
Lind, G. (2018). Using the Moral Competence Test. Retrieved from: https://www.uni-konstanz.de/ag-moral/mut/mjt-engl.htm
Linde-Navas, A. (2009). ¿Tienen vigencia los dilemas clásicos de Kohlberg en Educación Moral?. Un estudio de campo [Are the classic dilemmas of Kohlberg in Moral Education valid? A field study]. Campo Abierto. Revista de Educación, 28(2), 137–149.
Martí-Vilar, M., & Palma-Cortés, J. (2010). La medición psicológica del pensamiento moral [Psychological measurement of moral thinking]. In M. Martí-Vilar (Ed.), Razonamiento moral y prosocialidad: fundamentos (pp. 169–195). Madrid: Editorial CCS.
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144.
Merino-Soto, C., & Calderón-De la Cruz, G. (2018). Validez de estudios peruanos sobre estrés y burnout [Validity of Peruvian studies about stress and burnout]. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 35(2), 353–354. https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2018.352.3521.
Merino-Soto, C., & Dominguez-Lara, S. (2017). Diferenciando la espada de la mano [differentiating the sword from the hand]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 629–631.
Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., & Galotti, K. M. (2006). Children's moral reasoning regarding physical and relational aggression. Social Development, 15, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00346.x.
Narvaez, D. (2003). The neo-Kohlbergian tradition and beyond: Schemas, expertise and character. In C. Pope-Edwards & G. Carlo (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol.51: Moral Motivation through the Lifespan. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Page, R., & Bode, J. (1980). Comparison of measures of moral reasoning and development of a new objective measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000206.
Piaget J. (1976). Piaget’s theory. In B. Inhelder, H. H. Chipman, & C. Zwingmann (Eds.), Piaget and his school. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2.
Proios, M. (2010). Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of moral content judgment in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2010.9671942.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2019). Thanks coefficient alpha, we still need you! Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417725127.
Rest, J. R., Cooper, D., Coder, R., Masanz, J., & Anderson, D. (1974). Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas – An objective test of development. Developmental Psychology, 10, 491–501.
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644.
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679390.
Rudd, A., Mullane, S., & Stoll, S. (2010). Development of an instrument to measure the moral judgments of sport managers. Journal of Sport Management, 24(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.24.1.59.
Shiv, B., Loewenstein, G., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychological Science, 16(6), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01553.x.
Sijtsma, K. (2008). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.
Skisland, A., Bjørnestad, J., & Söderhamn, O. (2011). Construction and testing of the moral development scale for professionals (MDSP). Nurse Education Today, 32, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.002.
Swanson, H. L., & Hill, G. (1993). Metacognitive aspects of moral reasoning and behavior. Adolescence, 28(111), 711–735.
Thoma, S., Derryberry, W. P., & Crowson, H. M. (2013). Describing and testing an intermediate concept measure of adolescent moral thinking. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.766129.
Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.
Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach's alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769.
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach's alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189.
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401.
Wall, S., Williams, W. H., Morris, R., & Bramham, J. (2011). The development of a new measure of social-emotional functioning for young adolescents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104511401187.
Watkins, M. V. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364.
Web of Science Group (2020). Editorial selection process. Available in: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/editorial/. Accessed 12/15/2019.
Weber, J., & McGivern, E. (2010). A new methodological approach for studying moral reasoning among managers in business settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0146-5.
White, F. A. (1997). Measuring the content of moral judgement development: The revised moral authority scale (MAS-R). Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 25(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1997.25.4.321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
Manuel Marti-Vilar PhD declares that she has no conflict of interest; José Miguel Escrig-Espuig Psy M declares that she has no conflict of interest; César Merino-Soto Psy M declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Availability of Data and Material
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable.
Ethics Statement
There was no interaction with human research participants during this systematic review. As such, we have depended on the researchers whose work was reviewed for by proxy compliance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later addenda.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martí-Vilar, M., Escrig-Espuig, J.M. & Merino-Soto, C. A systematic review of moral reasoning measures. Curr Psychol 42, 1284–1298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01519-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01519-8