Skip to main content
Log in

Intolerable vices: An inductive-deductive empirical analysis of union intolerance in relation to willingness to join a union

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Provided are empirical answers to questions about what conscious emotions underlie union intolerance and what elements of these emotions relate to willingness to join a union. We draw from the racial intolerance literature, with attention to emotions listed by religious institutions as intolerable vices. We also draw from personal websites and blogs authored by employees who espouse union hatred to identify vices seen as encouraged by unions. With this source material in hand, union intolerance is defined as sustained hatred evoked when unions are perceived by nonunion employees to encourage intolerable vices, with union members envisioned as first-line recipients of such encouragement. Turning to the natural sciences, we evoked inductive processes to identify representative vices and to construct a union intolerance scale. With samples of nonunion employees (Ns = 262, 267), a scalable dimension is revealed. Our deductive work draws from: (a) a heuristic framework, in which conscious feelings are thought to evoke an emotional readiness to act; and (b) psychodynamics, in which unacceptable emotions are thought to be projected onto targeted others. With these conceptualizations, a prediction model is advanced, with willingness to join positioned as an outcome of readiness to act stemming from intolerance. Using the sample data, a hypothesized negative relationship is shown, in which diminished willingness to join is associated with more intolerance. Contextualized in reference to the union history of sampled employees, the negative relationship is also shown as intensified in relation to claims of union discrimination. Directions for future research and implications for union recruitment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. No personal websites and blog entries were found in conjunction with search phrases such as “why I love unions.” Instead, we found articles posted by news agencies and local and/or federated unions under titles such as “Why Unions Are Important,” “Why Join a Union,” and “Unions: The Folks Who Brought You the Weekend.” Although issues concerning “fairness,” “justice,” “voice,” and “community” were raised in these articles—issues undoubtedly infused with emotions—underlying feelings were neither cited nor expressed.

  2. The retention of words and phrases drawn from website entries reflects the inductive side of methods used to construct and evaluate item quality (see Alanis, 2012; Ispa, 2012 for demonstrations and discussions). Evoked by these methods is less reliance on a researcher’s judgment about the expression of item content (which can be excessively formal and abstract) in favor of more reliance on a researcher’s intent to represent item content as recorded in interviews and written accounts. Also, in contrast to a self-report attitude item, a tolerance item is constructed to assess acceptance/unacceptance of what a target does rather than to assess positive/negative feelings or thoughts about a target. In this regard, the intolerance items in our study are not designed to ask employees whether they have positive or negative feelings or thoughts about a union but rather whether they were willing to tolerate or not tolerate what a union does.

  3. Recent social science studies have also positioned anger, malicious envy, greed, and hubristic pride as predictors (e.g., Becker & Curhan, 2018; Lange & Crusius, 2015; Seuntjens et al., 2015; Smith, 1958/2017). Although these studies claim outcomes relevant to the experience of work, relationships shown are drawn from scenario-based experiments with undergraduate students. An exception is a nonexperimental self-report study conducted by Sterling et al. (2017) with office workers, in which positive associations were found between malicious envy (thoughts about depriving others of their possessions) and workplace deviance (undermining the efforts of others) and turnover intention. Also, in reference to these studies, “find text” searches yielded no matches for labor union, unions, union or nonunion employees, members, or membership.

  4. Whether projection as a defense mechanism operates at a subliminal level (unconscious) or a liminal level (somewhere between unconscious and conscious) is an open question debated by many (e.g., Erdelyi, 1985; Sherman et al., 2009). Whereas we think unacceptable emotions may be brought to awareness as vices through instruction and recognition, the process of projecting emotions onto others may not be wholly conscious or unconscious. Rather, the process may involve a back and forth shuttle of awareness (for parallel discussions, see Clark, 1998; Kim et al., 2013). There is a difference between awareness in a state of unbearable conflict when projection is “in use” and a state of bearable conflict when projection has been used, the latter of which may include reflection and acknowledgement of conflict. It is precisely this shuttling of awareness that lends itself to the idea that some awareness may be present even when projection is in use.

  5. Procedures and measures for the replication sample were identical to those used in the sample. Sampling was conducted during the second half of May 2019. Replication sample demographics by subgroup frequencies did not differ from sample demographics (see Table 1), χ2 ≤ 2.91, ps > .05. Also, for assumptions and rules underlying the inclusion of correlated error terms and the selection of appropriate fit indices, see Kenny (2011, 2015) and Schreiber, Nora, Stage, Barlow, and King (2006).

  6. Employees were reminded that if employed in the public-sector that “By federal law, you are free to choose to join or not to join a union. No matter which option you choose, you WILL be covered by the union contract.”

  7. To check for possible bias based on prior union membership, measurement and model analyses were rerun minus sampled employees who indicated prior membership. The results of these analyses were similar to those reported; fit indices were stable as were p-levels for the tested relationships. Tables of nonreported results are available from the author.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

  • Alanis, K. L. (2012). Using quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate survey item quality: A demonstration of practice leading to item clarity. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 73, 1-A. http://citeseex.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.946.3796&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Alperin, R. M. (2016). Jewish self-hatred: The internalization of prejudice. Clinical Social Work Journal., 44, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0577-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Reed II, K., Thau, S., & Freeman, D. (2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How the self-importance of moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. J., & Curhan, J. R. (2018). The dark side of subjective value in sequential negotiations: The mediating role of pride and anger. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bendassolli, P. F., & Tateo, L. (2018). The meaning of work and cultural psychology: Ideas for new directions. Culture & Psychology, 24, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X17729363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer, D. (1937). The cost of discipline. Macmillan.

  • Clark, A. J. (1998). Defense mechanisms in the counseling process. Sage.

  • Cohen, D., & Gunz, A. (2002). As seen by the other : Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 13, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. B., Malka, A., Rozin, P., & Cherfas, L. (2006). Religion and unforgivable offenses. Journal of Personality, 74, 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00370.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. (1994). What Buddhist are doing when they deny the self? In S. Collins (Ed.), Religion and practical reason: New essays in the comparative philosophy of religions (pp. 59–86). State University of New York Press.

  • Conte, H. R., & Plutchik, R. (1995). Ego defenses: Theory and measurement. Wiley.

  • DeCotiis, T. A., & LeLouarn, J.-Y. (1981). A predictive study of voting behavior in a representation election using union instrumentality and work perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90041-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebler, S. (2014). Relationships between religion and intolerance towards Muslims and immigrants in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Review of Religious Research, 56, 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-013-0126-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D. M. (1953). Studies in Muslim ethics. SPCK Publishing.

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 3-4, 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., Ricard, M., & Wallace, B. A. (2005). Buddhist and psychological perspectives on emotions and well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00335.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind: Rationality and the emotions. Cambridge University Press.

  • Erdelyi, M. H. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Freud’s cognitive psychology. Freeman.

  • Erlich, H. S. (2017). Envy and its dynamic in groups and organization. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations (pp. 211–223). Oxford University Press.

  • Exline, J. J., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500342000077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. J. (Ed.). (1994). Visions of the other: Jewish and Christian theologians assess the dialogue. Paulist Press.

  • Fletcher, Jr., B., & La Luz, J. A. (2020). Trump, right-wing populism, and the future of organized labor. In J. Kerrissey, E. Weinbaum, C. Hammonds, T. Juravich, & D. Clawson (Eds.), Labor in the time of Trump (pp. 50–66). Cornell University Press.

  • Freud, S. (1920/1977). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. W. W. Norton.

  • Freud, A. (1936/1993). The ego and mechanisms of defense. Routledge.

  • Glick, P. (2005). Choice of scapegoats. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 244–261). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch15.

  • Godard, J. (2008). Union formation. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), The Sage handbook of industrial relations (pp. 377–405). Sage.

  • Godard, J., & Frege, C. (2013). Labor unions, alternative forms of representation, and the exercise of authority in the U.S. workplace. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 66, 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391306600106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles, A. I. (1993). Socialization: An interactive process. Cuadernos de Realidades Sociales (Notebooks of Social Realities), 41–42, 227–246.

  • Goodman, M. (2018). A history of Judaism. Princeton University Press.

  • Gowans, C. W. (2013). Ethical thought in Indian Buddhism. In S. M. Emmanuel (Ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (pp. 429–451). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Greenhouse, S. (2019). Beaten down, worked up: The past, present, and future of American labor. Knopf.

  • Hackman, J.R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägglund, M. (2019). This life: Secular faith and spiritual freedom. Pantheon.

  • Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2013). Detecting psychological phenomena: Taking bottom-up research seriously. American Journal of Psychology, 126, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2018). Method matters in psychology: Essays in applied philosophy of science. Springer.

  • Harari, Y. N. (2016). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Harper.

  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. R., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogler, R. L. (2020). Labor unions in the trump administration: Courts, congress, and the National Labor Relations Board. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 32, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-019-09341-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogler, R. L., Hunt III, H. G., & Weiler, S. (2015). Killing unions with culture: Institutions, inequality, and the effects of labor’s decline in the United States. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 27, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-014-9257-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Rizzo, J. R. (1972). Toward the measurement of organizational practices: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 9, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1940.9917696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D., Rodriguez, J., Smith, E., Johnson, D., Stevenson, H., & Spicer, P. (2006). Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann, K., & Bauer, U. (2018). Socialisation during the life course. Routledge.

  • Ispa, J. M. (2012). Pursuing and sharing knowledge to inform practice and policy: The value of qualitative research in translational research. In E. Wethington & R. E. Dunifon (Eds.), Research for the public good: Applying the methods of translational research to improve human health and well-being (pp. 103–125). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13744-000.

  • Izzo, J. B. (2017). The five thieves of happiness. Berrett-Koehler.

  • Kagan, J. (2013). Equal time for psychological and biological contributions to human variation. Review of General Psychology, 17, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2018). Three unresolved issues in human morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617727862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24, 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M. (1996). Empirical versus theoretical progress in science. In R. S. Cohen, R. Hilpen, & Q. Renzong (Eds.), Realism and antirealism in the philosophy of science (pp. 171–193). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_12.

  • Kendi, I. K. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. National Books.

  • Kenny, D. A. (2011). Respecification of latent variable models. http://davidakenny.net/cm/respec.htm

  • Kenny, D. A. (2015). Measuring model fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

  • Kernberg, O. (1967). Borderline personality organization. Journal of the Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 641–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306516701500309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., Zeppenfeld, V., & Cohen, D. (2013). Sublimation, culture, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 639–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2006). Emulation and the use of role models in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 35, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kurtz, S. (2018). The death knell for unions? The Supreme Court gets to decide. Fox News. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/the-death-knell-for-unions-supreme-court-gets-to-decide

  • Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E. (2019). The deep history of ourselves: The four-billion-year story of how we got conscious brains. Viking.

  • Lenski, G. E. (1961). The religious factor: A sociological study of religion’s impact on politics, economics, and family life. Doubleday.

  • Lepie, J. (2016). The union-buster toolkit. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 28, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-016-9283-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1952). Mere Christianity. HarperCollins.

  • Lichtenstein, N. (2013). State of the union: A century of American labor (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

  • Lindholm, C. (2008). Culture and envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 227–244). Oxford University Press.

  • Logan, J. (2006). The union avoidance industry in the United States. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00518.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. (2020). The U.S. union avoidance industry goes global. New Labor Forum, 29, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796019893336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. (2012). All that’s left now is to sound the death knell for unions. New York Post. http://nypost.com/2012/06/06/all-thats-left-is-to-sound-the-death-knell-for-unions/

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlevey, J. (2020). A collective bargain: Unions, organizing, and the fight for democracy. HaperCollins.

  • McKenzie, J. F., Wood, M. L., Kotecki, J. E., Clark, J. K., & Brey, R. A. (1999). Establishing content validity: Using qualitative and quantitative steps. American Journal of Health Behavior, 23, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.23.4.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S. (2019). Confidence at work and individualism-collectivism: An empirical demonstration of the distinctiveness of American union employees. Current Psychology, 38, 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9636-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S., & Decker, R. (2020). Multiple jobholders with families: A path from jobs held to psychological stress through work-family conflict and performance quality. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 32, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-020-09343-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, S., & Kath, L. M. (2011). Fear of reprisal for disclosing union interest: Assessing the effectiveness of perceived anti-unionism. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9154-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, T., & Thompson, L. (2010). Envy at work. Harvard Business Review, 88, 74–79 https://hbr.org/2010/04/envy-at-work.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J., & Schneider, R. (2017). The financial diaries: How American families cope in a world of uncertainty. Princeton University Press.

  • Mortimer, J. T., Lorence, J., & Kumka, D, S. (1986). Work, family and personality: Transition to adulthood. Ablex.

  • Murray, H. (1962). The personality and career of Satan. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. S., Duff, K. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). A new look at defensive projection: Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 980–1001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. S., Caldwell, T. L., Chamberlin, B., & Griffin, T. (2005). Thought suppression, projection, and the development of stereotypes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh, S., Beiser, M., Kaspar, V., Hou, F., & Rummens, J. (1999). Perceived racial discrimination, depression, and coping: A study of southeast Asian refugees in Canada. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, H. (2018). What a real live union-busting seminar looks like. Splinter. https://splinternews.com/what-a-real-live-union-busting-seminar-looks-like-1828520464

  • Ogden, T. H. (1982). Projective identification and psychotherapeutic technique. Jason Aronson.

  • Opotow, S., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The intensification of hating: A theory. Social Justice Research, 20, 68–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0033-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palavar, W. (2005). Envy or emulation: A Christian understanding of economic passions. In W. Palavar & P. Steinmair-Posel (Eds.), Passions in the Economy, Politics, and the Media (pp. 139–162). Lit Verlag.

  • Peterson, H. (2020, April 20). Amazon-owned whole foods is quietly tracking employees with a heat map tool that ranks which stores are most at risk of unionizing. Business Insider, 1-8. https://www.businessinsider.com/whole-foods-tracks-unionization-risk-with-heat-maps-2020-1

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2010). Union-free America: Workers and antiunion culture. University of Illinois Press.

  • Rosenfeld, J. (2014). What unions no longer do. Harvard University Press.

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royzman, E. B., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2005). From Plato to Putnam: Four ways to think about hate. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 3–35). American Psychological Association.

  • Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S. (1997). The seven deadly sins: Jewish, Christian, and classical reflections on human psychology. Oxford University Press.

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019). The church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A. S. (2018). American hate: Survivors speak out. The New Press.

  • Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., Van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2015). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp000003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D. K., Cohen, G. L., Nelson, L. D., Nussbaum, A. D., Bunyan, D. P., & Garcia, J. (2009). Affirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (1958/2017). The world’s religions (Rev. ed.). Ishi Press.

  • Smith, D. L. (2011). Less than human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others. St. Martin’s Press.

  • Smith, D. L. (2014). Dehumanization, essentialism, and moral psychology. Philosophy Compass, 9(11), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, G. D., & Spindler, L, S. (1990). The American cultural dialogue and its transmission. Falmer Press.

  • Stearns, C. (2019). Critiquing social and emotional learning: Psychological and cultural perspectives. Lexington Books.

  • Stein, M. (2000). “Winners” training and its troubles. Personnel Review, 29, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480010296267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, C. M., Van de Ven, N., & Smith, R. H. (2017). The two faces of envy: Studying benign and malicious envy in the workplace. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations (pp. 57–84). Oxford University Press.

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.

  • Tillich, P. (1959). The courage to be. Yale University Press.

  • Timpe, K., & Boyd, C. A. (Eds.). (2014). Virtues and their vices. Oxford University Press.

  • Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 6, 951–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by selected characteristics, 2017-2018 annual averages, Table 1. (2019). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.t01.htm

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Harvard University Press.

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2000). Negative emotion in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy. International Journal of Stress Management, 7, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009592430712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veselka, L., Giammarco, E. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). The dark triad and the seven deadly sins. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpone, S. D., & Avery, D. R. (2013). It’s self-defense: How perceived discrimination promotes employee withdrawal. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walinga, P., Corveleyn, J., & van Saane, J. (2005). Guilt and religion: The influence of orthodox Protestant and orthodox Catholic conceptions of guilt on guilt-experience. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 27, 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. P. (1998). Total victory: The complete management guide to a successful NLRB representation election (2nd ed.). LRI Publications.

  • Wiltse, V., & Palmer, H. (2011). Hidden in plain sight: Observations on the origin of the enneagram. The Enneagram Journal, 4, 4–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. (2006). The effect of Confucian values on succession in family business. Family Business Review, 19, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lizabeth Barclay, Carrie Bulger, James Green, Robert Hogan, Katherine Holzer, R. James Holzworth, Rick Jacobs, David Kenny, and Michael Robb for their thoughtful and helpful comments on an earlier version of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Mellor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures used in this study involving participants are in accordance with the ethical standards of the author’s institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study in the form of an information sheet.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

As a team project from beginning to end, the “we” indicated in the article reflects the shared insight and work of the following students: Nicolle Anderson, Taylor Barr, Hope Burnaman, Alec Calvo, Ragan Decker, Adela Fejzaj, Lauren Gannon, Jeffrey Hanrahan, Samantha Mayo, Charles Sauer, and Sarah Wolfram.

Appendix

Appendix

Example Page of the Union Intolerance Scale

We are interested in what you think about labor unions.

Below are statements taken from various Internet blogs, in which bloggers expressed their willingness or unwillingness to tolerate a union in their work environment should they be required to join a union OR should they be given a choice to join a union.

Please read each statement carefully and decide for yourself.

Check one blank.

I am willing to tolerate a union or I am not willing to tolerate a union...

... that urges members of the union to pride themselves as the best trained, the most responsible, the most reliable, and the most dedicated employees that an employer could ever hope for.

_____ willing to tolerate _____ not willing to tolerate

... that urges members of the union to observe strict work rules set by the union contract—including break times, start and end times, and overtime—even if following the rules means that work on a job has to be delayed or restarted the next day.

_____ willing to tolerate _____ not willing to tolerate.

[Continues with 10 more items; see Table 2]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mellor, S. Intolerable vices: An inductive-deductive empirical analysis of union intolerance in relation to willingness to join a union. Curr Psychol 42, 2031–2048 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01356-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01356-9

Keywords

Navigation