Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A study on organizational trust content in Chinese business organizations

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 September 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study was conducted to confirm the applicability of OTC (organizational trust content) in Chinese organizations via the OTI (organizational trust inventory) developed by Cummings and Bromiley (1996). This study explored the vertical and horizontal trust relationships that exist among supervisors, subordinates and colleagues of equal standing through focused interviews and questionnaires to recognize and assess OTC. The results showed that in situations with a high degree of OT (organizational trust), three dimensions coexist namely: 1) the ability to keep commitments, 2) the ability to negotiate honestly, and 3) the ability to NTEA (not taking excessive advantage). Each dimension includes three trust elements: cognition, affection, and intended behavior. Different measuring subjects have significantly different perceptions of OTC, with subordinate recognition being the most trustworthy. At the same time, the integrity performance of colleagues is the most recognized element. Though OTC is applicable in Chinese organizations, the degree of subordinate recognition and the ability to negotiate honestly between colleagues are affected by the “respectful superior and inferior subordinate” relationship and the hierarchical authority, which exist in Chinese culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The information of the police department involved in this study is not suitable for public disclosure.

Change history

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y. T., Wang, Y. G., & Xi, Y. M. (2008). The mode of multi-level leadership’s effects on employee’s trust in leadership, performance and innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 22(3), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baştug, G., Pala, P., Kumartaşli, M., Günel, İ., & Duyan, M. (2016). Investigation of the relationship between organizational trust and organizational commitment. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1418–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 8. Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1995). Transactions costs in organizations with trust. In R. Bies, R. Lewicki, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 219–247). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casimir, G., Waldman, D. A., Bartram, T., & Yang, S. (2006). Trust and the relationship between leadership and follower performance: Opening the black box in Australia and China. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(3), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, A. M., Chau, J. P. & Holroyd, E. (1999) Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalent. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(2):316–322.

  • Chams-Anturi, O., Moreno-Luzon, M. D., & Escorcia-Caballero, J. P. (2020). Linking organizational trust and performance through ambidexterity. Personnel Review, 49(4), 956–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. Y., et al. (2015). Organizational justice, trust, and identification and their effects on organizational commitment in hospital nursing staff. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 363–379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Cheng, H. Y. (2006). Guanxi networks and members’ effectiveness in Chinese work teams: Mediating effects of trust networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive proprieties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory: Development and validation. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 302–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organizations. Personnel review, 35(5), 557–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. R. (2018). Measured difference of organizational trust among community college employees. World Journal of Management, 9(2), 57–71.

  • Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M., & Semerciöz, F. (2010). Trust in personal and impersonal forms its antecedents and consequences: A concetional analysis within organizational context. International Journal of Management and Information Systems, 14(2), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, C., Green, K., & Plumlee, G. (2015). Impact of ethics environment and organizational trust on employee engagement. Journal of Legal, Ethical & Regulatory Issues, 18(3), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, W. C., Vivian Chen, C. H., Lee, C. C., & Kao, R. H. (2012). Work characteristics and police officers’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of social work characteristics collective efficacy in multilevel analysis. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(3), 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, W. L., Cheng, B. S., & Huang, M. P. (2002). Chinese business leaders’ employee categorization and managerial behaviors. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 18(1), 51–94 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iddagoda, Y. A., & Opatha, H. H. (2020). Relationships and mediating effects of employee engagement: An empirical study of managerial employees of Sri Lankan listed companies. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020915905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasielska, D., Rogoza, R., Zajenkowska, Z., & Russa, M. B (2019). General trust scale: Validation in cross-cultural settings. Current Psychology. Published online 12 Septemer 2019.

  • Jiang, D. Y., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Affect- and role-based loyalty to supervisors in Chinese Organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(3), 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Söbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International. In B. Lewicki & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 219–247). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, R. H. (2017). The relationship between work characteristics and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A multi-level study on transformational leadership and organizational climate in immigration workers. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1890–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kath, L. M., Magley, V. J., & Marmet, M. (2010). The role of organizational trust in safety climate’s influence on organizational outcomes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5), 1488–1497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. (2008). Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2013). What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., & Yan, J. (2007). The mechanism of how trust climate impacts on indicidual performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(6), 1111–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Brisbane: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Madhok, A. (1994). Revisiting multinational firms’ tolerance for joint ventures: A trust based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Shoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D., & Kuhnert, K. (1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight D, Chervany N (2000) The meanings of trust. Working paper No. 96–04. Carlson School of Management, MIS Research Center, University of Minnesota.

  • McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty SK, P A (2020) Identification of drivers of employee engagement in Indian power companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0414.

  • Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T., & Lilly, B. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranca, C. A., & Iordănescu, E. (2013). Assessment of organizational trust: preliminary data for Romanian adaptation of the organizational trust inventory short form. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 436–440.

  • Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlgaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons: New York.

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). Haddington: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational trust it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, D., & Mehta, P. (2020). Manifestation of internal CSR on employee engagement: Mediating role of organizational trust. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(3), 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, T.S., Chen, C., Cui, X., Yang, C. and Ma, W. (2020) Consistency at different levels: A meta-analytic examination of organizational trust and performance. Nankai Business Review International, Vol. ahead-of-print No. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2020-0005.

  • Tan, H. H., & Chee, D. (2005). Understanding interpersonal trust in a Confucian-influenced society: An exploratory study. International Journal of Cross-cultural Management, 5(2), 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. H., & Lim, A. K. H. (2009). Trust in coworkers and trust in organizations. The Journal of Psychology, 143(1), 45–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological model of justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidotto, G., Vicentini, M., Argentero, P., & Bromiley, P. (2008). Assessment of organizational trust: Italian adaptation and factorial validity of the organizational trust inventory. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H. M., & Long, L. R. (2009). Effects of congnition- and affect-based trust supervisors on task performance and OCB. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(1), 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M. (1997). The impact of human resource activities on employee trust. Human Resource Management Review, 7(4), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. D. (1991). The social construction of business systems in East Asia. Organization Studies, 12(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. S., & Huang, I. C. (2003). The role of perceived quality of social relationships within organizations in Chinese societies. International Journal of Management, 20(2), 216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization: A psychological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. L. T. (2009). Towards a structural model of a small family business in Taiwan. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(4), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. C., Mai, Q., Tsai, S. B., & Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ocean and Border Governance, National Quemoy University, 1 University Rd Jinning Township, Kinmen, 892, Taiwan

    Hsiang-Yu Ma, Cheng-Chung Cho & Rui-Hsin Kao

  2. Department of Business Administration, National Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.17-2, Yong Gong 1st Rd, Yong An Hsiang, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Leng-Chuan Chiu

Authors
  1. Hsiang-Yu Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng-Chung Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui-Hsin Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leng-Chuan Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The information of the corporate sector involved in this study is not suitable for public disclosure.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui-Hsin Kao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This study does not involve ethical issues.

Consent for Publication

The authors of this study agree to the submission of this article.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original vision of this article has been revised. The first author name has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, HY., Cho, CC., Kao, RH. et al. A study on organizational trust content in Chinese business organizations. Curr Psychol 41, 8594–8612 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01340-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01340-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation