Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring belongingness: Validation and invariance of the general belongingness scale in Spanish adults

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Baumeister and Leary (1995) belongingness is an important characteristic of psychological functionality and central to human need. The experience of achieved belongingness is a positive feeling of security and comfort that is the result of feeling part of a community, in personal life, at the workplace, or in any other social contexts. In addition, belongingness is an important predictor of well-being. This study presents the Spanish adaptation of the General Belongingness Scale GBS (Malone et al. 2012), with a test of four different confirmatory models, including bifactor and methods effects model. A sample of 240 Spanish adults replied to the Spanish version of the GBS, the satisfaction with life scale and a short form of the Big Five dimensions. The Spanish version showed best fit with a model representing a one-factor structure and a method factor, associated with reversed-worded items. GBS showed strong invariance by gender; no gender differences in general belongingness were observed. Validity evidences, i.e. correlations with well-being and the Big Five dimensions, were similar to the results with the original English version. We conclude that our results warrant the use of the Spanish version of the General Belongingness Scale in further studies with this construct. Future studies should also assess test-retest reliability and include additional measures for establishing construct and predictive validity: Since belongingness is associated with well-being and other positive outcomes and thwarted belongingness a risk factor for suicidal behavior, belongingness could also be used with clinical samples and psychotherapy outcome studies in order to measure therapeutic change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Allen, K. A., & Bowles, T. (2012). Belonging as a guiding principle in the education of adolescents. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 12, 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assavedo, B. L., & Anestis, M. D. (2016). The relationship between non-suicidal self-injury and both perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. Journal of Psychopatholy and Behavioural Assessesment, 38, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9508-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & Merita, M. G. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes. Psicothema, 12(2), 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Brewer, L. E., Tice, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (2007). Thwarting the need to belong: Understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153683-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Brislin, S. J., Venables, N. C., Joiner, T. E., & Patrick, C. J. (2017). Trait liabilities and specific promotive processes in psychopathology: The example of suicidal behavior. Journal of Affective Disorders, 216, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casale, S., & Fioravanti, G. (2018). Why narcissists are at risk for developing Facebook addiction: The need to be admired and the need to belong. Addictive Behaviors, 76, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Checa, I., & Espejo, B. (2018). Method effects associated with negative worded items in the 29 items Spanish version of Ryff's well-being scales. Neuropsychiatry, 8, 1533–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Intrinsic motivation. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 1–2). Online Library: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor indices calculator: A microsoft excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. University of Kentucky. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01.

  • Finney, S. J. y DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In G.R. Hancock y R.O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Gangadharbatla, H. (2010). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the Igeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M. K., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K. L., Bouwsema, M., & Collier, P. (1992). Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 6, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9417(92)90028-H.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M. K., & Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199501000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, B. M., & Williams, R. A. (2010). The effects of sense of belonging, social support, conflict, and loneliness on depression. Nursing Research, 48(4), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199907000-00004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hapenny, J. E., & Fergus, T. A. (2017). Cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, and their interactive effect: Examining associations with thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Test Commission. (2010). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Version 2010.

  • Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.

  • Krämer, N., Hoffmann, L., & Eimler, S. (2015). Not breaking bonds on Facebook- mixed-methods research on the influence of individuals’ need to belong on “unfriending” behavior on Facebook. International Journal of Developmental Science, 9, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-150161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Crevier-Braud, L. (2011). The fundamental need to belong: On the distinction between growth and deficit-reduction orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., & Sunderland, M. (2019). The development and validation of the thwarted belongingness scale (TBS) for interpersonal suicide risk. Journal of Psychopatholy and Behavioural Assessesment, 41, 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09721-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, G. P., Pillow, D. R., & Osman, A. (2012). The general belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: D. Van Norstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayash, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., Hambleton, R. K., & International Test Commission. (2013). International test commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberst, U., & Stewart, A. (2003). Adlerian psychotherapy: An advanced approach to individual psychology. London: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renau, V., Oberst, U., Gosling, S., Rusiñol, J., & Chamarro, A. (2013). Translation and validation of the ten-item-personality inventory into Spanish and Catalan. Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport, 31(2), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satici, S. A., & Gocet-Tekin, E. (2016). Psychometric properties of the general belongingness scale in Turkish youth. Current Psychology, 35, 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9329-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, C. (2012). LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. Hamburg, Germany: LimeSurvey Project http://www.limesurvey.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreindorfer, L., & Leary, M. (1996). Seeking acceptance versus avoiding rejection: Differential effects on emotion and behavior. In meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.

  • Shifron, R. (2010). Adler’s need to belong as the key for mental health. Journal of Individual Psychology, 66(1), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenbergs self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Lila, M. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.769394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2010). The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychological Review, 117(2), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Venta, A., Mellick, W., Schatte, D., & Sharp, C. (2014). Preliminary evidence that thoughts of thwarted belongingness mediate the relations between level of attachment insecurity and depression and suicide-related thoughts in inpatient adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(5), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.5.428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2005). Measuring the big five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, S. (2009). Factor structure of the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of wording effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldız, M. A. (2016). Serial multiple mediation of general belongingness and life satisfaction in the relationship between attachment and loneliness in adolescents. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldız, M. A. (2017). Adaptation of general belongingness scale into Turkish for adolescents: Validity and reliability studies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain

    Irene Checa

  2. Blanquerna School of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Sports, Department of Psychology, Ramon Llull University, c/Cister, 34, 08022, Barcelona, Spain

    Ursula Oberst

Authors
  1. Irene Checa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ursula Oberst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Checa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Irene Checa declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ursula Oberst declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Checa, I., Oberst, U. Measuring belongingness: Validation and invariance of the general belongingness scale in Spanish adults. Curr Psychol 41, 8490–8498 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01279-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01279-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation