Abstract
In 2015, the “One Child Per Family” policy which had been in place for nearly 40 years was terminated in China. This policy has had a significant historical impact on the society. Comparing the populations of one-only children and children with siblings is an effective way to reflect on this policy. This study used data between 2014 and 2017 from the National Assessment Center for Education Quality in China. Samples with hundreds of thousands of 4th grade and 8th grade students were Meta-analyzed to reveal the significant large magnitude of differences in academic achievement between one-only children and children with siblings. These differences vary across several demographic group factors, such as subjects, grade years, Social Economic Status (SES), locations, and achievement levels. However, there are no significant gender differences between the two groups. With an increase in the number of one-child families in some Western countries, the finding would be very beneficial to learn about the strength and weakness of this family structure and also provides insights to schoolteachers and counselors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality.
References
Bao, S. D., & Su, T. N. (1989). The analysis of academic achievement and personality characteristics about only children and non-only children in China. Northwest Population Journal, 4, 35–44.
Benner, A., Boyle, A., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4.
Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Booth, A. L., & Kee, H. J. (2009). Birth order matters: The effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 367–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-007-0181-4.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2012). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.
Brozo, W. G., Sulkunen, S., Shiel, G., Garbe, C., Pandian, A., & Valtin, R. (2014). Reading, gender, and engagement, lessons from five PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(7), 584–593.
Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013). Little emperors:Behavioral impacts of china's one-child policy. Science, 339(6122), 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230221.
Chen, Y. (2007). Parent-child relationship in single-child families in China. World Cultural Psychiatry Research Review, 2(4), 123–127.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2, 19–74.
Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U., & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessments in education: Assessing component skills and collecting contextual data. Paris: PISA, The World Bank, Washington, D.C./OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264248373-en.
Deutsch, F. M. (2006). Filial piety, patrilineality, and china's one-child policy. Journal of Family Issues, 27(3), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05283097.
Doh, H., & Falbo, T. (1999). Social competence, maternal attentiveness, and overprotectiveness: Only children in Korea. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502599384044.
Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56(6/7), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.6-7.497.
Downey, D. B., & Nerbauer, S. (1998). Is resource dilution inevitable? The association between number of siblings and educational outcomes across subgroups. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Edwards, R. P., & Thacker, K. (1979). The relationship of birth-order, gender, and sibling gender in the two-child family to grade point average in college. Adolescence, 14(53), 111–114.
Falbo, T. (1987). Only children in the United States and China. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 7, 159–183.
Falbo, T. (2012). Only children: An updated review. Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(1), 38–49.
Falbo, T. (2018). Evaluations of the behavioral attributes of only children in Beijing, China: Moderating effects of gender and the one-child policy. Heliyon, 4(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00607.
Falbo, T., & Polit, D. (1986). Quantitative review of the only-child literature: Research evidence and theory development. Psychological Bulletin, 100(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.176.
Falbo, T., & Poston, D. (1993). The academic, personality, and physical outcomes of only children in China. Child Development, 64(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02893.x.
Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereotyping and students’ perception of their abilities in science, mathematics and language. Social Psychology of Education, 4(3–4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011332704215.
Hall, G. S. (1898). Some aspects of the early sense of self. American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 351–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411300.
Hauser, R. M., & Sewell, W. H. (1985). Birth order and educational attainment in full sibships. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022001001.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486.
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0015362.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156.
Iqbal, H. M., Bibi, F., & Iqbal, N. T. S. (2015). Exploring factors affecting grade VIII students’ attainment in science: Options for reforms. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(4), 210–217.
Jiao, S., Ji, G., & Jing, Q. (1996). Cognitive development of Chinese urban only children and children with siblings. Child Development, 67(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131821.
Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2012). Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial. World Journal of Methodology, 2(4), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v2.i4.27.
Laybourn, A. (1990). Only children in britain: Popular stereotype and research evidence. Children & Society, 4(4), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1990.tb00375.x.
Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D., & Liu, H. (2020). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self-efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi-level analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, online. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12351.
Liu, R. X., Lin, W., & Chen, Z. Y. (2010). School performance, peer association, psychological and behavioral adjustments: A comparison between Chinese adolescents with and without siblings. Journal of Adolescence, 33(3), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.007.
Liu, D., Chung, K. K. H., & Mcbride, C. (2016). The role of ses in chinese (L1) and english (L2) word reading in chinese-speaking kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12046.
Liu, N., Chen, Y., Yang, X., & Hu, Y. (2017). Do demographic characteristics make differences? Demographic characteristics as moderators in the associations between only child status and cognitive/non-cognitive outcomes in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00423.
Ma, Y. (2011). Math and reading achievement gaps – New insights to old problems. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 14(6), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2011)0000014008.
Mancillas, A. (2006). Challenging the stereotypes about only children: A review of the literature and implications for practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2006.tb00405.x.
Marks, G. N. (2006). Family size, family type and student achievement: Cross-national differences and the role of socioeconomic and school factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1363/3220906.
Newman, S. (2001). Parenting an only child: The joys and challenges of raising your one and only. New York: Broadway Books.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, Reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-8-en.
Polit, D. F., & Falbo, P. T. (1987). Only children and personality development: A quantitative review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/352302.
Polit, D. F., & Falbo, T. (1988). The intellectual achievement of only children. Journal of Biosocial science, 20(03), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000006611.
Poston, D. L., & Falbo, T. (1990a). Academic performance and personality traits of Chinese only children: “Onlies” versus others. American Journal of Sociology, 96(2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/229534.
Poston, D. L., & Falbo, T. (1990b). Scholastic and personality characteristics of only children and children with siblings in China. International Family Planning Perspectives, 16(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2133467.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: A meta-analysis of national assessment of educational progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000012.
Roberts, L. C., & Blanton, P. (2001). ‘I always knew mom and dad loved me best’: Experiences of only children. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 57, 125–140.
Travis, R., & Kohli, V. (1995). The birth order factor: Ordinal position, social strata, and educational achievement. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(4), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1995.9712218.
Tsui, M., & Rich, L. (2002). The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban China. Gender & Society, 16(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202016001005.
Veenhoven, R., & Verkuyten, M. (1989). The well-being of only children. Adolescence, 24(93), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288003.
Wei, W., Wu, Y., Lv, B., Zhou, H., Han, X., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2016). The relationship between parental involvement and elementary students’ academic achievement in China: One-only children vs. children with siblings. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 7(4), 483–500.
Wu, D. Y. H. (1996). Chinese childhood socialization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 143–154). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yang, H., Kao, H., & Wang, W. (1980). Survey of only children in educational institutes of Beijing city districts. China Youth Daily, 10.
Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, G. B. (1975). Birth order and intellectual development. Psychological Review, 82(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076229.
Zhan, M. (2006). Assets, parental expectations and involvement, and children's educational performance. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(8), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.008.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071091 and 31571152); Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (19YJC880123).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Cai, M., Zhong, H. et al. Comparisons of academic achievements of one-only children vs. children with siblings in China. Curr Psychol 40, 5658–5671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01263-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01263-5