Skip to main content

Academic Achievement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disproportionality and Social Justice in Education

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Child and Family Studies ((SSCFS))

  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

The achievement gap for racially and ethnically diverse students and students with disabilities remains among the most “wicked” problems in education. Data from the most recent National Assessment of Educational Performance (NAEP. NAEP Data Explorer. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE, 2022) present a stark realization that there has been little change in the achievement gap between White and Black and Hispanic students since the 1990s. Data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Kindergarten Cohort 1998 (ECLS-K), the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (SECCYD), and National Longitudinal Study of Youth 79—Child and Young Adult Cohort (CNLSY)—reported similar findings, particularly for White and Black students. In this chapter, we advance empirical evidence of disproportionate academic achievement through an in-depth analysis of the 2017–2018 civil rights collection data (CRDC). Analysis of the CRDC data updates current understandings about disproportionality of advanced placement (AP) course enrollment by race/ethnicity, disability status, and gender and, as an indicator of achievement, provides insights about disproportionality in academic achievement. Overall, the risk ratios for all subgroup comparisons were statistically significant, suggesting that the proportion of students enrolled in AP courses by subgroup is not equal. Specifically, Black and Hispanic students remain significantly less likely to be enrolled in these courses, while enrollment is almost non-existent for students with disabilities receiving special education services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12(5), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00371

  • Barnard-Brak, L., McGaha-Garnett, V., & Burley, H. (2011). Advanced placement course enrollment and school-level characteristics. NASSP Bulletin, 93(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636511418640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiman, A., & Ruiz, N. G. (2021). Key facts about Asian Americans, diverse and growing population. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/29/key-facts-about-asian-americans/

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., Crosnoe, R., Friedman, S. L., McLoyd, V., & Pianta, R. (2011). Examining the Black–White achievement gap among low-income children using the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development, 82(5), 1404–1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01620.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chajewski, M., Mattern, K. D., & Shaw, E. J. (2011). Examining the role of Advanced Placement Exam participation in 4-year college enrollment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimpian, J. R., Lubienski, S. T., Timmer, J. D., Makowski, M. B., & Miller, E. K. (2016). Have gender gaps in math closed? Achievement, teacher perceptions, and learning behaviors across two ECLS-K cohorts. AERA Open, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673617

  • Chatterji, M. (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., E. Campbell, C. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld, and R. York. (1966). The Coleman Report. Equalityof Educational Opportunity

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, D., Long, M. C., & Iatarola, P. (2009). Explaining race, poverty, and gender disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self‐and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the Black-White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2005). The Black-White test score gap through third grade. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11049

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 210–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. A., Whitford, D. K., Katsiyannis, A., Adams, S., & Jasper, A. (2019). National analysis of the disciplinary exclusion of black students with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(7), 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7

  • Graefe, A. K., & Ritchotte, J. A. (2019). An exploration of factors that predict advanced placement exam success for gifted Hispanic students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19853194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartlep, N. D. (2021). The model minority stereotype: Demystifying Asian American success (2nd ed.). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsin, A., & Xie, Y. (2014). Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8416–8421. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1406402111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husain, M., & Millimet, D. L. (2009). The mythical “boy crisis”? Economics of Education Review, 28, 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Moon, S., & Hegar, R. L. (2011). Mathematics skills in early childhood: Exploring gender and ethnic patterns. Child Indicators Research, 4, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, S., Haimson, J., Liu, A. Y., Burghardt, J., Johnson, D. R., & Thurlow, M. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 1: Comparisons with other youth: Full report (NCEE 2017-4016). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., Bub, K. L., & McCartney, K. (2006). Understanding trends in the Black–White achievement gaps during the first years of school. (Brookings-Warton Papers on Urban Affairs). Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Performance (NAEP). (2022). NAEP Data Explorer. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE

  • Office of Civil Rights [OCR]. (2021). 2017-18 Civil Rights Data Collection: List of CRDC Data Elements for School Year 2017–18. Washington, D.C.: Author. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/2017-18-crdc-data-elements.pdf

  • Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paschall, K. W., Gershoff, E. T., & Kuhfeld, M. A. (2018). A two-decade examination of historical race/ethnicity disparities in academic achievement by poverty status. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 47, 1164–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0800-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, A. M., & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Fahle, E. M., Kalogrides, D., Podolsky, A., & Zárate, R. C. (2019). Gender achievement gaps in US school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2474–2508. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219843824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Portilla, X. A. (2016). Recent trends in income, racial, and ethnic school readiness gaps at kindergarten entry. AERA Open, 2(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416657343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Robinson, J. P. (2008). Patterns and trends in racial/ethnic and socioeconomic academic achievement gaps. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 499–518). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general Theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/ellendo/rittel/rittel-dilemma.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, A. C., & Stevens, J. J. (2015). Once, sometimes, or always in special education: Mathematics growth and achievement gaps. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shores, K., Kim, H. E., & Still, M. (2020). Categorical inequality in Black and White: Linking disproportionality across multiple educational outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 57(5), 2089–2131. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219900128

  • Sohn, K. (2012). A new insight into the gender gap in math. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64, 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasetto, C., Alparone, F. R., & Cadinu, M. (2011). Girls’ math performance under stereotype threat: the moderating role of mothers’ gender stereotypes. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 943.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2022a). Digest of Education Statistics, Table 221.75. Average National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading scale score and standard deviation, by selected student characteristics, percentile, and grade: Selected years, 1992 through 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_221.75.asp

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2022b). Digest of Education Statistics, Table 222.77. Average National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) mathematics scale score and standard deviation, by selected student characteristics, percentile, and grade: Selected years, 1992 through 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_222.77.asp

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2022c). Fast facts: Students with disabilities. Author. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. National Commission on Excellence in Education: [Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office distributor].

    Google Scholar 

  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

  • Whiting, G. W., & Ford, D. Y. (2009). Multicultural issues: Black students and Advanced Placement classes: Summary, concerns, and recommendations. Gifted Child Today, 32(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2009-840

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Gage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gage, N., van Dijk, W. (2022). Academic Achievement. In: Gage, N., Rapa, L.J., Whitford, D.K., Katsiyannis, A. (eds) Disproportionality and Social Justice in Education. Springer Series on Child and Family Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13775-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics