Abstract
The present study investigated the relation among mobile phone use in the college classroom and Big Five personality traits, which had not been addressed in previous research. Undergraduate students (83 males and 92 females) whose average age was 20 (SD = 5.1) completed questionnaires on demographic characteristics, mobile phone use, impulse control, and Big Five personality traits. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine whether each personality trait made a unique contribution in predicting mobile phone use in the classroom after taking into consideration the contribution of impulse control in this prediction. The results show that impulse control and conscientiousness are significant, independent predictors of in-class mobile phone use over and above each other after controlling for demographic characteristics and general mobile phone use. These results suggest that some aspects of conscientiousness unexplained by impulse control may also be related to media multitasking in the college classroom, and the present study sheds light on the importance of continued research on the relation between conscientiousness and in-class media multitasking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
Although users may underreport their mobile phone use (cf. Wentland, 1993), previous research has shown that self-reported mobile phone use is moderately correlated with the objective measure collected through a mobile phone application (r = 0.48; Ellis et al., 2019). Because the primary analysis of the present study was correlational in nature (i.e., not investigating the exact duration of mobile phone use in the classroom), we believe the use of the self-reported data was acceptable for this exploratory study.
References
Abel, J. I., Buff, C. L., & Abel, J. P. (2012). Can they defer the cellular lure? College students’ self-control and cell phone usage. Review of Business Research, 12(4), 101–106.
Allom, V., Mullan, B., & Hagger, M. (2016). Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1051078.
Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.622814.
Bates, J. E., Schermerhorn, A. C., & Goodnight, J. A. (2010). Temperament and personality through the life span. In R. M. Lerner, M. E. Lamb, & A. M. Freund (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (Vol. 2, pp. 208–253). John Wiley & Sons.
Bellur, S., Nowak, K. L., & Hull, K. S. (2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.027.
Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39.
Bjornsen, C. A., & Archer, K. J. (2015). Relations between college students’ cell phone use during class and grades. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000045.
Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887.
Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2017). Students' use of cell phones in class for off-task behaviors: The indirect impact of instructors' teaching behaviors through boredom and students' attitudes. Communication Education, 66(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241888.
Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006). The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.003.
Caspi, A., & Shiner, R. L. (2006). Personality development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 300–365). Wiley.
Demirhan, E., Randler, C., & Horzum, M. B. (2016). Is problematic mobile phone use explained by chronotype and personality? Chronobiology International, 33(7), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2016.1171232.
Duckworth, A. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and school success. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Müller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 208–230). Cambridge University Press.
Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 739–741. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0030.
Ellis, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Shaw, H., & Geyer, K. (2019). Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.004.
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786.
Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the big five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12287.
Hayashi, Y. (2020). Attitude moderates the relation between frequency of media multitasking in the classroom and delay discounting. The Psychological Record. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00443-w.
Hayashi, Y., & Blessington, G. P. (2018). A behavioral economic analysis of media multitasking: Delay discounting as an underlying process of texting in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.049.
Hayashi, Y., & Nenstiel, J. N. (2019). Media multitasking in the classroom: Problematic mobile phone use and impulse control as predictors of texting in the classroom. Current Psychology Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00395-7.
Hayashi, Y., Russo, C. T., & Wirth, O. (2015). Texting while driving as impulsive choice: A behavioral economic analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 83, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.025.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006.
Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2018). Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the five factor model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013.
Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Hudiburgh, L. M. (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001.
Ledbetter, A. M., & Finn, A. N. (2016). Why do students use mobile technology for social purposes during class? Modeling teacher credibility, learner empowerment, and online communication attitude as predictors. Communication Education, 65(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1064145.
Lee, S., Kim, M. W., McDonough, I. M., Mendoza, J. S., & Kim, M. S. (2017). The effects of cell phone use and emotion-regulation style on college students' learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3323.
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010.
Martens, M. P., Karakashian, M. A., Fleming, K. M., Fowler, R. M., Hatchett, E. S., & Cimini, M. D. (2009). Conscientiousness, protective behavioral strategies, and alcohol use: Testing for mediated effects. Journal of Drug Education, 39(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.2190/de.39.3.d.
McDonald, S. (2013). The effects and predictor value of in-class texting behavior on final course grades. College Student Journal, 47(1), 34–40.
Miley, W. M., & Spinella, M. (2006). Correlations among measures of executive function and positive psychological attributes in college students. The Journal of General Psychology, 133(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.133.2.175-182.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7.
Nikbin, D., Iranmanesh, M., & Foroughi, B. (2020). Personality traits, psychological well-being, Facebook addiction, health and performance: Testing their relationships. Behaviour & Information Technology Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1722749, 1, 17.
Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.007.
Raynor, D. A., & Levine, H. (2009). Associations between the five-factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. Journal of American College Health, 58(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.58.1.73-82.
Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. L. (2014). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1315–1330. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031109.
Roberts, J. A., Pullig, C., & Manolis, C. (2015). I need my smartphone: A hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049.
Saville, B. K., Gisbert, A., Kopp, J., & Telesco, C. (2010). Internet addiction and delay discounting in college students. The Psychological Record, 60(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395707.
Schutten, D., Stokes, K. A., & Arnell, K. M. (2017). I want to media multitask and I want to do it now: Individual differences in media multitasking predict delay of gratification and system-1 thinking. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0048-x.
Spinella, M. (2005). Self-rated executive function: Development of the executive function index. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115(5), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590524304.
Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041.
Stein, J. S., Wilson, A. G., Koffarnus, M. N., Daniel, T. O., Epstein, L. H., & Bickel, W. K. (2016). Unstuck in time: Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology, 233, 3771–3778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4410-y.
Sween, M., Ceschi, A., Tommasi, F., Sartori, R., & Weller, J. (2017). Who is a distracted driver? Associations between mobile phone use while driving, domain-specific risk taking, and personality. Risk Analysis, 37(11), 2119–2131. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12773.
Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.604802.
Wei, F.-Y. F., & Wang, Y. K. (2010). Students' silent messages: Can teacher verbal and nonverbal immediacy moderate student use of text messaging in class? Communication Education, 59(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496092.
Wei, F.-Y. F., Wang, Y. K., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.672755.
Wentland, E. J. (1993). Survey responses: An evaluation of their validity. Academic Press.
Williams, J. A., Berg, H., Gerber, H., Miller, M., Cox, D., Votteler, N., et al. (2011). “I get distracted by their being distracted”: The etiquette of in-class texting. Eastern Educational Journal, 40(1), 48–56.
Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychological predictors of young adults' use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0094.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
The institutional review board at the Pennsylvania State University reviewed the study protocol and deemed the study exempt.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toyama, M., Hayashi, Y. Links of personality traits to media multitasking: Conscientiousness predicts mobile phone use in the college classroom. Curr Psychol 41, 8660–8667 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01258-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01258-2