Abstract
We explored patterns of supervisor-supervisee interactions in face-to-face supervisory conference, drawing upon theoretical constructs from Rogerian-Penman psychology. Theoretical constructs targeted in the analysis include: tallying responses according to specific subcategories i.e., seeking solutions, descriptions, identification, and resolutions. Structure and source of information include manifest/latent and power/involvement, as well as stages of professional development for the supervisee. “Before and after” supervisory conference goals are established for two students in special education. Face-to-face conversations, subsequent transcriptions, and written conversational analysis of video conferences of supervisors and supervisees are presented. The results of our study indicate hallmarks of a more sensitive analysis for the evaluation of face-to-face supervision, i.e., the source of information discussed in relation to the first supervision conference corresponded to 63% opinion. Results indicate that the practitioner progressed from the stage of “Stagnation” to that of “Confusion.” Additionally, the supervisor needed to be more “Catalytic” as evidenced by the use of 16% Resolutions and 30% Seeking Solutions. We elaborate on the analysis and the indicators for professional development that were identified. Such analysis offers a practical approach based on established theoretical frameworks in an effort to provide insights into professional growth and the supervisory relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. L. (1988). The Supervisory Process in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. In The supervisory process in speech language pathology and audiology. Austin: Pro-Ed.
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a Science of Personality. Harvard University Press: Cambridge Massachusetts.
Baecher, L., & McCormack, B. (2015). The impact of video review on supervisory conferencing. Language and Education, 29(2), 153–173 http://www.teslej.org/wordpress/issues/volume18/ej71/ej71a5/ Accessed 20 April 2016.
Baecher, L., McCormack, M., & Kung, S. C. (2014). Supervisor use of video as a tool in teacher reflection. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 18(3), 1–17.
Beder, J. (2000). The integration of theory into practice: Suggestions for supervisors. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 3, 40–42 http://www.profdevjournal.org/articles/32040.pdf . Accessed 15 April 2016.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (4th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1978a). A Rogerian orientation to the speech-language pathology supervisory relationship. ASHA, 20, 286–290.
Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1978b). Perceived interpersonal conditions and professional growth of master’s level SLP students during the supervisory process. ASHA, 20, 467–477.
Caracciolo, G. L., Rigrodsky, S., & Morrison, E. B. (1980). Supervisory relationships and the growth in clinical effectiveness and professional self-esteem of undergraduate student clinicians during a school-based practicum. LSHSS, 11, 118–126.
Corey, G., Haynes, R., Moulton, P., & Muratori, M. (2010). Clinical supervision in the helping professions: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gardner, R. S., & Wampold, B. E. (1991). Relationship of power and involvement to working alliance: A multiple-case sequential analysis of brief therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 107–114.
Grant, J., Schofield, M., & Crawford, S. (2012). Managing difficulties in supervision: Supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(4), 528–541.
Haggerty, G., & Hilsenrot, M. (2011). The use of video in psychotherapy supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 27(2), 193–210.
Huhra, R. L., Yamokoski-Maynhart, C. A., & Prieto, L. R. (2008). Reviewing videotape in supervision: A developmental approach. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86(4), 412–418.
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 3–42.
MacCluskie, K. C. (2010). Acquiring counseling skills: Integrating theory, multiculturalism, and self-awareness. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill.
Nelson, M. L., Barnes, K. L., Evans, A. L., & Triggiano, P. J. (2008). Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 172–184.
Penman, R. (1980). Communication processes and relationships. London: Academic Press.
Pickering, M. (1988). Expectation and intent in the supervisory process. The Clinical Supervisor, 5, 43–57.
Pretorius, W. M. (2006). Cognitive Behavioural therapy supervision: Recommended practice. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 413–420.
Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London: Constable.
Rogers, C. R. (1962). The interpersonal relationship: The core of guidance. Harvard Educational Review, 32(4), 416–429.
Shulman, L. (2010). Interactional supervision (3rd ed.). Washington: NASW Press.
Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739.
Watkins, C. E. (2013). The beginnings of psychoanalytic supervision: The crucial role of max Eitingon. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 254–270.
Wood, C. (2005). Supervisory working Alliance: A model providing direction for college counseling supervision. Journal of College Counseling, 8(2), 127–137.
Ylonen, A., & Norwich, B. (2015). How lesson study helps teachers of pupils with specific needs or difficulties. In P. Dudley (Ed.), Lesson study: Professional learning for our time (pp. 70–86). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors had no financial or other conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Nomenclature
- AGR:
-
Agree
- AV:
-
Avoid
- Abs:
-
Abstain
- CAT:
-
Catalytic
- CaEf:
-
Cause and Effect
- C:
-
Column
- Coll:
-
Collaborate
- Conc:
-
Concede
- Cc:
-
Concepts
- Contr:
-
Control
- Con:
-
Confrontative
- Corr:
-
Correlation
- DD:
-
Developmental Dyscalculia
- Des:
-
Description
- EX:
-
Exchange
- FC:
-
Facilitative
- F:
-
Facts
- H:
-
High
- ID:
-
Identification
- Inf:
-
Inferential
- IT:
-
Interpersonal Theme
- L:
-
Low
- Lat:
-
Latent
- Man:
-
Manifest
- M:
-
Medium
- Nu:
-
Number
- OF:
-
Offer
- Ops:
-
Opinions
- P/I:
-
Power/ Involvement
- PR:
-
Predictive/Probability
- Pres:
-
Prescriptive
- PT:
-
Professional Theme/ Res= Resolution
- SeeS:
-
Seeking Solutions
- SEK:
-
Seek
- SHR:
-
Share
- Sp:
-
Speaker
- Sour:
-
Source
- Stru:
-
Structure
- Sup:
-
Support
- StRea:
-
Style of Reasoning
- s:
-
supervisee (SpE)
- SM:
-
Supervision Model
- S:
-
Supervisor
- Th:
-
Theme
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kountoura, V., Agaliotis, I., Loutrari, A. et al. Indicators for professional growth for health care specialists: Face-to-face supervision. Curr Psychol 40, 1958–1967 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0134-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0134-6