Abstract
Italian (n = 129) and American (n = 86) samples were evaluated with the Five Factor Inventory of personality and a measure of individualism/collectivism. Greater individualism was seen in the American group than the Italian group, as in the Hofstede (2019) data. For the Italian sample only, greater individualism was associated with greater neuroticism and greater collectivism was associated with lower neuroticism. This may reflect poor culture fit for Italians with a very individualistic orientation given that Italy falls between the United States and Asian countries in terms of the individualism/collectivism dimension. Other studies have shown better personal adjustment being associated with having a personality that fits with the culture in which one is embedded. For both Italian and American groups, higher collectivism was associated with higher extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness consistent with other reports. Additional findings included higher openness in the Italian group and higher conscientiousness in the American group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Bhullar, N., Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M. (2012). Trait emotional intelligence as a moderator of the relationship between psychological distress and satisfaction with life. Individual Differences Research. 10(1):19–26.
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2009). Patterns and sources of adult personality development: Growth curve analyses of the NEO PI-R scales in a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 142–155.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). NEO-PI-R. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Damian, R., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 674–695.
Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well- being of nations. Journel of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.
Gyorkos, C., Becker, J., Massoudi, K., Antoinette, J., Pocnet, C., de Bruin, G., & Rossier, J. (2013). Comparing the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale and the Auckland individualism and collectivism scale in two cultures: Switzerland and South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 25, 310–331.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2019). Country comparison tool. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52–88.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93–124.
Lalwani, A., Shrum, L., & Chiu, C. (2009). Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 870–882.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 5, 420–430.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516. Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO five factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 116–128.
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (2010). NEO inventories for the NEO personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), Neo five-factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO-PI-R). Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
McCrae, R., & Terraciano, A. (2008). The five factor model and its correlates in individuals and cultures. In F. J. R. Van de Vijver, D. A. Van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. Mahwah: Psychology Press.
McCrae, R., Terraciano, A., & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.
Mossakowski, K. N. (2007). Are immigrants healthier? The case of depression among Filipino Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3), 290–304.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
Paquet, S. L., & Kline, T. J. B. (2009). Uncovering the psychometric properties of scales measuring individualist and collectivist orientations. International Journal of Testing, 9, 260–270.
Pervin, L. (2002). Current controversies and issues in personality. New York: John Wiley.
Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 93–116.
Schmitz, P. (1994). Acculturation and adaptation processes among immigrants in Germany. In A. Bouvy, F. Vijver, P. Boski, & P. Schmitz (Eds.), Journeys into cross cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Singelis, T. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
Singelis, T., Triandis, H., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.
Terracciano, A. (2003). The Italian version of the NEO PI-R: Conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1859–1872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00035-7.
Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.
Triandis, H. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415.
Triandis, H., & Gelfand, M. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128.
Ward, C., & Chang, W. (1997). “Cultural fit:” a new perspective on personality and sojourner adjustment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 525–533.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Harkness, A. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 18–31.
Zobel, A., Barkow, K., Schulze-Rauschenbach, S., von Widdern, O., Metten, M., Pfeiffer, U. et al. (2004). High neuroticism and depressive temperament are associated with dysfunctional regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in healthy volunteers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109:392–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, L., Delvecchio, E., Germani, A. et al. Individualism/collectivism and personality in Italian and American Groups. Curr Psychol 40, 29–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00584-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00584-4