Abstract
Previous research (Ruch et al. 2014) identified four dimensions of class clown behavior (identifying as a class clown, comic talent, disruptive rule-breaker, and subversive joker), and confirmed their relevance for well-being in adolescents and school achievement. However, the correlational patterns between the four class clown behaviors and humor dimensions has not been examined so far. In a sample of 1451 German-speaking adults, this study investigates the relationships of retrospectively assessed class clown behavior with eight different humor dimensions stemming from two models (i.e., fun, mockery, inept humor, cognitive humor, laughter, canned humor/jokes, and benevolent and corrective humor). Further, we studied the associations of class clown behavior with past, present, and future life satisfaction, and different orientations to well-being (i.e., towards pleasure, engagement, meaning, positive relationships, and accomplishment). Results identified that class clown behavior positively related to all dimensions of humor with the strongest relationships for the dimensions of fun, mockery, and corrective humor. While all class clown dimensions positively related to the orientations to pleasure and meaning, a differential pattern of relationships was obtained for life satisfaction: Comic talent and joker went along with past life satisfaction, while identifying as a class clown negatively related to present life satisfaction. We conclude that: (1) the humor of class clowns is described best by the humor dimensions of fun, mockery, and corrective humor; (2) different dimensions of class clowning show similar, but distinguishable correlational patterns to the humor dimensions; (3) specific dimensions of class clowning relate to past and present life satisfaction, and these relationships cannot be explained by the current use of humor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434537.
Barnett, L. A. (2018). The education of playful boys: Class clowns in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00232.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
Craik, K. H., Lampert, M. D., & Nelson, A. J. (1996). Sense of humor and styles of everyday humorous conduct. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.273.
Damico, S. B., & Purkey, W. W. (1978). Class clowns: A study of middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312015003391.
Dush, C. M. K., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056438.
Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016). Positive psychology interventions addressing pleasure, engagement, meaning, positive relationships, and accomplishment increase well-being and ameliorate depressive symptoms: A randomized, placebo-controlled online study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00686.
Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2017). The subjective assessment of accomplishment and positive relationships: Initial validation and correlative and experimental evidence for their association with well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 743–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9751-z.
Heintz, S., Ruch, W., Platt, T., Pang, D., Carretero-Dios, H., Dionigi, A., Argüello Gutiérrez, C., Brdar, I., Brzozowska, D., Chen, H.-C., Chłopicki, W., Collins, M., Ďurka, R., El Yahfoufi, N. Y., Quiroga-Garza, A., Isler, R. B., Mendiburo-Seguel, A., Ramis, T., Saglam, B., Shcherbakova, O. V., Singh, K., Stokenberga, I., Wong, P. S. O., & Torres-Marín, J. (2018). Psychometric comparisons of benevolent and corrective humor across 22 countries: The virtue gap in humor goes international. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00092.
Kets de Vries, M. (1990). The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations, 43, 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004300804.
Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Oxford, UK: Academic press.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of adolescence, 29(6), 891-909.
Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_11.
Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.
Platt, T. (2012). Class clown behavior survey. Unpublished research instrument, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Platt, T., Wagner, L., & Ruch, W. (2016). The association between class clown dimensions, school experiences and accomplishment. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.036.
Ruch, W. (Ed.) (2007) The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (Humor Research Series, Vol. 3). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruch, W. (2012a). Towards a new structural model of the sense of humor: Preliminary findings. AAAI Fall Symposium: Artificial Intelligence of Humor, 2, 68–75.
Ruch, W. (2012b). Four dimensions of humor scale. University of Zurich, Unpublished manual.
Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2016). The virtue gap in humor: Exploring benevolent and corrective humor. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000063.
Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the revised sense of humor scale and the construction of a parallel form. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 31(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR-2016-0085.
Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2019). On the dimensionality of humorous conduct and association with humor traits and behaviors. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.
Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, R. T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000030.
Ruch, W., Platt, T., & Hofmann, J. (2014). The character strengths of class clowns. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01075.
Seligman, M. E. (2001). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C.R. Snyder, & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3-12) . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Seligman, M. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.
Trautwein, U. (2004). Die temporalen Facetten der Lebenszufriedenheit. [the temporal facets of life satisfaction]. Diagnostica, 50, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.182.
Wagner, L. (2019). The social life of class clowns: Class clown behavior is associated with more friends, but also more aggressive behavior in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in absence of any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 32 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Platt, T., Gander, F. & Giuliani, F. Relationships of retrospectively assessed class clown behavior with current humor and well-being. Curr Psychol 42, 16320–16329 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00571-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00571-9