Skip to main content
Log in

On the role of vocal emotions in social decision-making

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emotional expressions constitute valuable information for decision-making in social interaction contexts. However, the range of emotions that have been studied is limited. The present study addresses the effects of a wider range of emotional expressions using a methodology modeling interdependent decision-making in social contexts, the Assurance Dilemma. Joy, sadness, anger, fear, disgust and emotionally neutral vocal expressions were presented to 46 participants taking part in the Assurance Dilemma, obtaining behavioral and judgment data on cooperation behavior. For each emotion, predictions based on theoretical accounts and research on emotion induction in decision-making contexts were advanced; joy, sadness and fear were predicted to increase cooperation while anger and disgust to decrease it, as compared to neutral expressions. Results show that emotional expressions reliably affected cooperation, although not always according to the predictions: except for joy, all emotions decreased cooperation. Judgment measures provide further insight into the decision-making process. When collected before participants experienced feedback in the interactions, judgment measures show that participants hold a priori expectations on others’ likely behaviors depending on the emotional expression they display and are willing to use them to guide their decision-making process. This data aligns more closely with predictions. However, after experiencing outcomes, expectations are revised and converge with the behavioral patterns observed in the actual interactions. Results are discussed in terms of how emotional expressions are used for guiding expectations and taking decisions in social interaction contexts and the role that experience plays in this process. Limitations are pointed out directions for future research suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Also known as Stag Hunt dilemma (c.f. Skyrms 2003)

Reference

  • Abe, J. A. A., & Izard. (1999). The developmental functions of emotions: An analysis in terms of differential emotions theory. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alguacil, S., Tudela, P., & Ruz, M. (2015). Ignoring facial emotion expressions does not eliminate their influence on cooperation decisions. Psicológica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 36(2), 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts, (pp. 49–96). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012057770-5/50005-9.

  • Andrade, E. B., & Ho, T. H. (2007). How is the boss’s mood today? I want a raise. Psychological Science, 18(8), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01956.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, R. J. (1963). Evolution of facial expression. Science, 142(3595), 1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.142.3595.1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck, B. B., & Duchaine, B. (2009). Integration of social and utilitarian factors in decision making. Emotion, 9(5), 599–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandstra, N. F., Chambers, C. T., McGrath, P. J., & Moore, C. (2011). The behavioural expression of empathy to others’ pain versus others’ sadness in young children. Pain, 152(5), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 4(2), 107–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.107.

  • Besson, M., Magne, C., & Schön, D. (2002). Emotional prosody: Sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01975-7.

  • Biele, C., & Grabowska, A. (2006). Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions. Experimental Brain Research, 171(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0254-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, J. A., & Menez, M. (2017). Vocal Emotion Expressions Effects on Cooperation Behavior. Psicológica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 38(1), 1–24.

  • Caballero, J. A., Díaz, M. M., Arias-trejo, N., Rodriguez, F. L., & Pell, M. D. (2018). How to do things with(out) words ? Analyzing the effects of vocal emotional expressions on cooperation behavior. In 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018 (pp. 260–264). Poznan, Poland. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-53.

  • Campellone, T., & Kring. (2013). Context and the perception of emotion in schizophrenia: Sex differences and relationships with functioning. Schizophrenia Research, 149(1–3), 192–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canary, D., Spitzberg, B., & Semic, B. (1998). The experience and expression of anger in interpersonal settings. In P. Andersen & L. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, H., Kim, D., Susskind, J., & Anderson, A. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 23, 1222–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., DeJong, D., & Forsythe, R. (1996). Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12, 187–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.3.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Melo, C., Carnevale, P. J., Read, S. J., & Gratch, J. (2014). Reading people’s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C., & Wilson, R. (2003). The human face of game theory: Trust and reciprocity in sequential games. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust & reciprocity (pp. 245–274). Nueva York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Miller, P. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., Mathy, R. M., & Reno, R. R. (1989). Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 268–287.

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., & Mansted, A. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 456–467). New York/London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1988). The Laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H., Ishii, K., & Ambady, N. (2011). Misery loves company: When sadness increases the desire for social connectedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1438–1448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. L., & Marsh, A. a. (2015). Why do fearful facial expressions elicit behavioral approach? Evidence from a combined approach-avoidance implicit association test. Emotion, 15(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Summerell, E. (2017). On the importance of both dimensional and discrete models of emotion. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040066.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, D. J., Preston, S. D., & Stansfield, R. B. (2014). Altruism in the wild: When affiliative motives to help positive people overtake empathic motives to help the distressed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawk, S. T., Van Kleef, G. A., Fischer, A. H., & van Der Schalk, J. (2009). “Worth a thousand words”: Absolute and relative decoding of nonlinguistic affect vocalizations. Emotion, 9(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. (1991). The psychology of emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Izard. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izard. (1997). Differential emotions theory. In Human emotions (pp. 43–66). New York: Platinum Press.

  • Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Kring, A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 320–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kret, M. E., & De Gelder, B. (2012). Sex differences in processing emotional signals of others. Neuropsychologia, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022.

  • Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A., Cosker, D., Marshall, D., Rosin, P., & Kappas, A. (2007). Facial dynamics as indicators of trustworthiness and cooperative behavior. Emotion, 7(4), 730–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, T., Connolly, T., & Ordoñez, L. (2012). Emotion, decision, and risk: Betting on gambles versus betting on people. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W. (1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards in self-control and social discounting. Judgment Decision Making, 6(6), 552–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, C., Zheng, L., & Gratch, J. (2009). Expression of moral emotions in cooperating agents. Intelligent Virtual Agents, 5773, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan, J. K., & Wang, L. (2016). The social world as an experimental game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. A., Leliveld, M. C., Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion. Nueva York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, H. (2009). Emotional tears as biological signals. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pell, M. D., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli, D. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Loyo, J., Mora-Reynoso, L., Sánchez-Loyo, L. M., & Medina-Hernández, V. (2012). Sex differences in facial, prosodic, and social context emotional recognition in early-onset schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, 2012, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/584725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, L. I., & DeScioli, P. (2017). The communicative function of sad facial expressions. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917700418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, L. I., Zeglen, K., & Schmidt, K. (2012). Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous prisoner’s dilemma game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, L. I., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. A. (2014). The commitment function of angry facial expressions. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1511–1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. (2008). Disgust. In H.-J. Lewis & Barret (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). New York/London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., & Talarico, J. M. (2009). A comparison of dimensional models of emotion: Evidence from emotions, prototypical events, autobiographical memories, and words. Memory, 17(8), 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903130764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 102–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(6), 2408–2412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scharlemann, J., Eckel, C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 617–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2000). Psychological models of emotions. In J. Borod (Ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion (pp. 137–162). Oxford/NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Banse, R., & Wallbott, H. G. (2001). Emotion inferences from vocal expression correlate across languages and cultures. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 32(1), 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 228–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Tracy, J. L. (2011). What are emotion expressions for? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2003). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165228.

  • Stouten, J., & de Cremer, D. (2010). “Seeing is believing”: The effects of facial expressions of emotion and verbal communication in social dilemmas. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanowski, F., Szymanowski, F., Kotz, S., Schröder, C., Rotte, M., & Dengler, R. (2007). Gender differences in processing emotional prosody. Clinical Neuropsychology, 118(4), e102–e103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Ruz, M. (2013a). Race, emotion and trust: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1494, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa, M., Strizhko, T., Capizzi, M., & Ruz, M. (2013b). Interpersonal effects of emotion in a multi-round trust game. Psicológica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 34(2), 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L. (2014). An evolutionary approach to understanding distinct emotions. Emotion Review, 6(4), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Emotion and the construal of social situations: Inferences of cooperation versus competition from expressions of anger, happiness, and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, 26(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.648174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P., Joireman, J., Parks, C., & Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigil, J. M. (2009). A socio-relational framework of sex differences in the expression of emotion. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 375–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Spaeth, A. M., Qu, Z., & Rao, H. (2016). Real and hypothetical monetary rewards modulate risk taking in the brain. Scientific Reports, 6(29520), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The experiment described in this paper is part of the first author’s doctoral dissertation under the supervision of the second author. The authors acknowledge the support received through a Ph.D. Scholarship (CONACYT, # 280423) awarded to Jonathan Caballero and the UNAM-DGAPA PAPIIT RN305412 grant awarded to Marina Menez Díaz. The authors want to thank Dr. Marc D. Pell for useful comments on a previous version of this article and Alexandra Topilova for support with English revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A. Caballero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No research ethics committee existed in the institution at the time of conducting the research. However, the procedures were conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration or comparable ethical standards and following APA’s ethical principles (including but not limited to acknowledging participants the purpose and expected duration of the study, that their personal data would remain confidential, and informing them of the right to withdraw from the study at any moment with no penalty, as well as debriefing them).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 143 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caballero, J.A., Menez Díaz, M. On the role of vocal emotions in social decision-making. Curr Psychol 40, 6014–6028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00509-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00509-1

Keywords

Navigation