Skip to main content
Log in

Does emotional resistance to change definitely stifle voice behavior? Revealing the reversal effect of humble leadership

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposed a counterintuitive view of the relationship between emotional resistance to change and voice behavior by addressing the moderating role of humble leadership and the symbolic effect of emotional resistance to change. We hypothesized that emotional resistance to change and voice behavior would have a U-shaped relationship that would emerge only when humble leadership was high. To offer support for our basic view that a high level of emotional resistance to change is a signal that employees will engage in voice behavior in the near future, we conducted a pilot study using 194 daily observations from 49 participants, and the results supported our argument. Using data from 237 supervisor-subordinate matched observations, we provided support for our hypothesis. Furthermore, our study showed that the relationship between emotional resistance to change and voice behavior tended to be an inverted U-shape when leaders expressed low levels of humility. We provided a possible explanation for these results and discussed the implications of our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Notably, emotional resistance to change is the same as an emotional reaction to imposed change in Oreg’s (2003) study. As an individual’s emotional reaction to imposed change contains unfavorable emotional reactions (e.g., stress and uneasiness) as well as favorable emotional reactions (e.g., relaxation and surprise), it is hard for us to understand that the term “emotional reaction to imposed change” reflects an individual’s unfavorable emotional reaction to making changes. Therefore, we employ the term “emotional resistance to change” instead of “emotional reaction to imposed change.”

  2. All the original English scales and translated Chinese scales used in the pilot study and the subsequent main study are displayed in Part 1 of the online supplemental material.

  3. The details about how we found the outliers are shown in Part 4 of the online supplementary material.

  4. The details of this scatter plot are shown in Part 5 of the online supplementary material.

  5. The results of the regression controlling for routine seeking, short-term thinking and cognitive rigidity are shown in Part 3 of the online supplementary material.

  6. The details of how we found the outliers and the results of the regression without the outliers are shown in Part 4 of the online supplementary material.

  7. The details of this scatter plot are shown in Part 5 of the online supplementary material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge that this research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71472054, 71772052) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019B03614).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhang.

Ethics declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author certifies that: (I) the article has not been published in any language before; (II) it is not being considered concurrently for publication elsewhere, (III) the research reported in the manuscript was conducted in accordance with general ethical guidelines in psychology, (IV) we have reviewed and understood journal policies in the guide, and (V) We wish to confirm that that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 177 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, ZD. et al. Does emotional resistance to change definitely stifle voice behavior? Revealing the reversal effect of humble leadership. Curr Psychol 40, 5333–5348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00462-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00462-z

Keywords

Navigation