Abstract
While there is accumulating evidence that individual differences in time perspective are important predictors of a diverse set of psychosocial outcomes, there is little understanding concerning the possible origins of these individual differences. To begin to examine the possible predictors of individual differences in time perspectives, three levels of personality (life history strategy, the Big Five personality traits, and identity) were used to predict the five time perspectives identified by Zimbardo and Boyd (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288, 1999). The results are discussed in terms of the ability of the three levels of personality, in combination and individually, to predict the time perspectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among African American adolescents. Adolescence, 42, 525–538.
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.
Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Smits, I., Luyckx, K., & Goosens, L. (2007). Identity Style Inventory (ISI4): Draft Version. Unpublished measure, Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Cortland, NY 13045.
Díaz-Morales, J. F., Ferrari, J. R., & Cohen, J. R. (2008). Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness–eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 228–240.
Dunkel, C., & Anthis, K. (2003). The self across time and space: Temporal and spatial continuity in identity. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research. Huntington: Nova.
Dunkel, C. S., & Decker, M. (2010). Convergent validity of measures of life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 681–684.
Dunkel, C., & Kerpelman, J. (Eds.). (2006). Possible selves: Theory, research, and application. NY: Nova.
Dunkel, C. S., & Sefcek, J. A. (2009). Eriksonian lifespan theory and life history theory: an integration using the example of identity formation. Review of General Psychology, 13, 13–23.
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., et al. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: from genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.
Harber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspectives. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255–264.
Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2005). Future-oriented thinking and adjustment in a nationwide longitudinal study following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 389–410.
Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718.
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.
Kruger, D. J., Reischl, T., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary & Cultural Psychology, 2(1), 1–22.
Lounsbury, J. W., Levy, J. W., Leong, J. J., & Gibson, L. W. (2007). Identity and personality: the Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to sense of identity. Identity, 7, 51–70.
McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and life story. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). NY: Guilford.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: fundamental principles for and integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.
Packard, B. W., & Conway, P. F. (2006). Methodological choice and its consequences for possible selves research. Identity, 6(3), 251–271.
Padawer, E. A., Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., Hershey, D. A., & Thomas, D. G. (2007). Demographic indicators as predictors of future time perspective. Current Psychology, 26, 102–108.
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. A. (2008). General factor of personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679–683.
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. A. (2009). A general factor of personality in the Comrey personality scales, Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2, and the multicultural personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 437–442.
Rushton, J. P., Bonds, T. A., & Hur, Y. (2008). The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185.
Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2007). What is the relevance of attachment and life history to political values? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 215–222.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunkel, C.S., Weber, J.L. Using Three Levels of Personality to Predict Time Perspective. Curr Psychol 29, 95–103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9074-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9074-x