Abstract
Neuroticism (N) assesses emotional sensitivity or lability, but the construct is poorly defined and instruments used to assess N are marred by a number of psychometric shortcomings. Neuroticism is also described in an overtly pejorative way, with items keyed for themes reflecting low self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. The present paper presents a revised model based on a new questionnaire entitled the Emotional Sensitivity Scale (ESS). Using an innovative scenario technique to generate items, exploratory factor analysis of the responses of 242 participants yielded orthogonal dimensions for positive (other-oriented) and negative (self-centered) emotional sensitivity, and the structure was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis. Validation studies showed that the ESS dimensions were related in systematic ways to related psychometric instruments and that, as predicted, participants scoring high on the positive dimension were better able to recognize displayed emotions. The new scale offers a basis for extending the research on emotional sensitivity using empirically discriminable positive and negative components.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, K. J. (1994). Impulsivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: A within-subjects test of the Yerkes–Dodson law. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 813–829.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chang, E. C. (1998). Does dispositional optimism moderate the relation between perceived stress and psychological well-being? A preliminary investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 233–240.
Claridge, G. S., Donald, J. R., & Birchall, P. M. (1981). Drug tolerance and personality: Some implications for Eysenck’s theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 153–166.
Corr, P. J., & Kumari, V. (1997). Sociability/impulsivity and attenuated dopaminergic arousal: Critical flicker/fusion frequency and procedural learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 805–815.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55, 299–316.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., et al. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 776–797.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck personality inventory. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
Forbes, A., & Roger, D. (1999). Stress, social support and fear of disclosure. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 165–179.
Fredrikson, M., & Georgiades, A. (1992). Personality dimensions and classical conditioning of autonomic nervous system reactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1013–1020.
Geen, R. (1984). Preferred stimulation levels in introverts and extraverts: Effects on arousal and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1303–1312.
Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parcelling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.
Martin, R., Berry, G., Dobranski, T., Horne, M., & Dodgson, P. (1996). Emotion perception threshold: Individual differences in emotional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 290–305.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.
Revelle, W., Humphreys, M. S., Simon, L., & Gilliland, K. (1980). The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: A test of the arousal model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 109, 1–31.
Rocklin, T., & Revelle, W. (1981). The measurement of extraversion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 279–284.
Roger, D., & Morris, J. (1991). The internal structure of the EPQ scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 759–764.
Roger, D., & Nessshoever, W. (1987). The construction and preliminary validation of a scale for measuring emotional control. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 527–534.
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guarino, L., Roger, D. & Olason, D.T. Reconstructing N: A New Approach to Measuring Emotional Sensitivity. Curr Psychol 26, 37–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-007-9004-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-007-9004-8