Skip to main content
Log in

Improving accuracy in an error detection task via task sequence

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intent of this study was to determine whether performance on an error detection task and a series of cognitive search and memory tasks would be affected if performed serially. Fifty-six participants were assigned into two experimental groups, defined by whether they performed the error detection task or the cognitive tasks first. Measures of hit rates and false alarms were taken for the error detection task, and the perceived workload of both tasks was measured immediately following completion. In the group that did the cognitive tasks first, a significant relationship between perceptions of mental demand on the cognitive tasks and subsequent performance on the error detection task was found. Also, false alarms in error detection were correlated with perceptions of time pressure and frustration measured after the error detection task. These results suggest that a mentally demanding initial task may facilitate performance in a subsequent cognitively-based task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, E.L., Barker, K.N., Malloy, M.J., & Heller, W.M. (1995). Dispensing errors and counseling in community practice. American Pharmacy, 12, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A.D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsing-Palacio, L. & Schell, K.L. (2003). Signal probability effects on error detection performance in a quality control task. Psychological Reports, 93, 343–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D.R. & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J., Byblow, W.D., & Ryan, L.A. (1993). Order effects and the weighting process in workload assessment. Applied Ergonomics, 24, 357–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grasha, A.F. (2000). Into the abyss: Seven principles for managing error in complex systems. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 57, 554–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grasha, A.F., Reilley, S., Schell, K.L., Tranum, D., & Filburn, J. (2000). A cognitive systems perspective on human performance in the pharmacy: Implications for accuracy, effectiveness, and job satisfaction. (Technical Report 062100-R). Cincinnati, OH: Cognitive-Systems Performance Laboratory, University of Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford: Robert E. Kreiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.G. & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload. (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, W.B. (1963). Operator loading tasks. Human Factors, 5, 155–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Davies, D.R., Westerman, S.J. & Stammers, R.B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1967). Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. & Bobrow, D.B. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, T.E. (1991). Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: Implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload. Human Factors, 33, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, R.D. & Eggemeier, F.T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human performance. Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance. (pp. 25–51). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilley, S., Grasha, A.F. & Schafer, J. (2002). Workload, error detection and experienced stress in a simulated pharmacy verification task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M.S. & McCo-rmick, E.J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design. (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, K.L., Woodruff, A., Corbin, B., Bilsing, L. & Melton, E. (2002). A comprehensive investigation of error detection effectiveness in a complex product verification task. (Technical Report 0802-01). San Angelo, TX: Human Performance Laboratory, Angelo State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warm, J.S. (1984). An introduction to vigilance. In J. S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C.D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D.L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance, (pp. 145–178). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd Edition). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C.D. & Hollands, J.G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kraig L. Schell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schell, K.L. Improving accuracy in an error detection task via task sequence. Curr Psychol 23, 305–317 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-004-1003-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-004-1003-4

Keywords

Navigation