Armeni, C. (2015) Global experimentalist governance, institutional law and climate change technologies. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64: 875-904
Augenstein, D. Dawson, M. & Thielbörger, P. (2018) The UNGPs in the European Union: the open coordination of business and human rights. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(1): 1-22
Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2016). Temporary Legislation, Better Regulation and Experimentalist Governance: An Empirical Study. Regulation and Governance, 12:192-219
Berman, P. S. (2020) Understanding Global Legal Pluralism: From Local to Global, from Descriptive to Normative in P.S. Berman (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism (pp. 1–36).
Birchall, D. (2021). Corporate Power over Human Rights: An Analytical Framework. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(1), 42-66
Black, J. (2002) Critical Reflections on Regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27: 1-35.
Black, J. (2008), Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2: 137-164.
Braithwaite, J. & Drahos, P. (2000) Global Business Regulation. OUP.
Broberg, M., & Sano, H.O. (2018) Strengths and weaknesses in a human rights-based approach to international development – an analysis of a rights-based approach to development assistance based on practical experiences. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(5): 664-680
Cantú Rivera, H. (2019), National Action Plans on Business and Human rights: Progress or Mirage? Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(2): 213-237.
Chalabi, A. (2018a) National human rights action planning. OUP.
Chalabi, A. (2018b) Added values of national human rights action planning for the UK in the Age of Brexit. UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2018/04/30/azadeh-chalabi-added-values-of-national-human-rights-action-planning-for-the-uk-in-the-age-of-brexit/. Accessed 24 August 2020
Chalabi, A. (2014) The nature and scope of states' obligation to adopt a national human rights action plan. The International Journal of Human Rights, 18: 391-413.
Chimhowu, A., Hulme, D., & Munro, L. (2019) The ‘new’ national development planning and global development goals: processes and partnerships. World Development, 120: 76-89.
Council of the European Union (2012) EU Strategic Framework on Human Rights and Democracy. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/foraff/131181.pdf. Accessed: 24 August 2020
Council of the European Union (2015) Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2015–2019.
https://ec.europa.eu/anti-traffickin`g/sites/antitrafficking/files/action-plan-on-human-rights-and-democracy-2015-2019_en.pdf Accessed: 24 August 2020
Council of the European Union (2020) Conclusions on Human Rights and Decent Work in Global Supply Chains of 2020, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/46999/st13512-en20.pdf Accessed 2 December 2020.
Council of Europe, Steering Committee for Human Rights, Drafting Group on Human Rights and Business (2014) Draft recommendation of the committee of ministers to member states on human rights and business. http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/hrpolicy/Other_Committees/HR_and_Business/Documents/CDDH-CORP%20Draft%20Recommendation%20Human%20Rights%20and%20Business%20Final%20ENG.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2020
de Búrca, G. (2010) New governance and Experimentalism: An introduction. Wisconsin Law Review, 2: 227-238
de Búrca, G. (2017). Human Rights Experimentalism. American Journal of International Law, 111(2): 277-316.
de Búrca G, & Scott, J. (2006) Introduction. In: G de Búrca, & J. Scott (eds) New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism, in Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Hart Publishing.
de Búrca, G., Keohane, R., & Sabel C (2013) New modes of pluralist global governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45: 723-786
de Búrca, G., Keohane, R., & Sabel, C. (2014) Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3): 477-486
de Felice, D., & Graf, A. (2015). The potential of national action plans to implement human rights norms: An early assessment with respect to the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(1): 40–71.
de Sousa Santos, B. (1995). Toward a new legal common sense. Law, globalization, and emancipation. London: Butterworths, 2002
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Holt.
DIHR (2020) National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights https://globalnaps.org Accessed: 24 August 2020
DIHR (2020), National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights, Resources. https://globalnaps.org/resources/ Accessed: 24 August 2020
DIHR/ICAR (2014) National Action Plan on business and human rights Toolkit
DIHR/ICAR (2017) National Action Plan on business and human rights Toolkit https://www.humanrights.dk/publications/national-action-plans-business-human-rights-toolkit-2017-edition Accessed: 24 August 2020
Dorf, M., & Sabel, C. (1998) A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism Columbia Law Review, 98(2): 267-473.
European Commission (2020) “National GPP Action Plans” https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/200311_GPP_NAPs_March_2020.pdf Accessed: 24 August 2020
European Commission (2011) A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM 681. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:en:PDF Accessed: 14 August 2020
European Network of
National Human Rights Institutions (2012) Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Discussion paper on National Action Plans for EU Member States http://businesshumanrights.org/en/pdf-implementing-the-un-guiding-principles-on-business-and-human-rights-discussion-paper-onnational-implementation-plans-for-eu-member-states. Accessed: 24 August 2020
European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (2020) Human rights- based approach http://ennhri.org/about-nhris/human-rights-based-approach/ . Accessed: 10 November 2020
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2015/mapping-child-protection-systems-eu/national-policy. Accessed: 10 November 2020
Ferguson J, Methven O’Brien C, McVey M, Morris D (2018) Securing sustainable and accountable business in Europe: the role of National Action Plans. https://mk0globalnapshvllfq4.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/scotlandnap_accountability_workshop_report.pdf. Accessed: 24 August 2020
Fung, A., & Wright, E.O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso
German Federal Foreign Office 2016. National action plan: Implementation of the UN guiding principles on business and human rights 2016 – 2020. available at: https://www.auswaertigesamt.de/blob/610714/fb740510e8c2fa83dc507afad0b2d7ad/nap-wirtschaft-enschenrechte-engl-data.pdf.
German Federal Foreign Office (2020) Monitoring the National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights (NAP).https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/aussenpolitik/themen/aussenwirtschaft/wirtschaft-und-menschenrechte/monitoring-nap/2131054. Accessed: 20 December 2020
Goldstein, G., & Ansell, C. (2018) Experimentalist governance in global public health: The case of UNAIDs. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 35(2):219-256
Goldsmith, J., & Posner, E. (2005) The Limits of International Law. Oxford University Press Hathaway, Oona . 2002. Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal 111:1935–2042.
Guy Peters, B. (2011) Steering, rowing, drifting or sinking? Changing patterns of governance. Urban Research & Practice, 4(1): 5-12.
Hampton, D. (2019). Modern Slavery in Global Supply Chains: Can National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights Close the Governance Gap? Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(2): 239-263
Hathaway, O. (2007). Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588–621.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kenner, J., & Peake, K. (2017) The Bangladesh Sustainability Compact: An effective exercise of global experimentalist EU governance. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19: 86-115.
Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2011) The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9: 7-23
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). ‘From “Big Government” to “Big Governance”?’ in David Levi-Faur (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (Oxford University Press 2012).
Lorion, S. (2019) A model for national human rights systems? new governance and the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 37(3); 234-25.
MacDonald, T., & MacDonald, K. (2020) Towards a ‘pluralist’ world order: creative agency and legitimacy in global institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 26(2): 518-544.
Methven O'Brien, C. (2019). Experimentalist global governance and the case for a framework convention based on the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. In M. Mullen (Ed.), Navigating a new era of business and human rights: Challenges and Opportunities under the UNGPs (pp. 204–213). Article 30. https://article30.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/08/a_new_era.pdf
Methven O'Brien, C. (2021). 'Business and Human Rights in Europe 2011-2021: A Decade in Review', in Czech, P., Heschl, L., Lukas, K., Nowak, M., & Oberleitner, G. European Yearbook of Human Rights 2021. Intersentia.
Methven O’Brien, C., Mehra, A., Blackwell, S., & Poulsen-Hansen C.B. (2016) National action plans: Current status and future prospects for a new business and human rights governance tool. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1): 117-126.
Methven O’Brien, C., & Ford, J. (2019) Business and human rights: from domestic institutionalisation to transnational governance and back again. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 37(3): 216-233.
Methven O'Brien, C., Mehra, A., Blackwell, S., & Poulsen-Hansen, C. B. (2016). National action plans: current status and future prospects for a new business and human rights governance tool. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2015.14
Morris, D., Bogner, L., Daubigeon, L., Blake, A., & Wrzoncki, E. (2018) National action plans on business and human rights: an analysis of plans from 2013 – 2018. The Danish Institute for Human Rights. https://www.humanrights.dk/sites/humanrights.dk/files/media/document/NAP%20analysis.pdf. Accessed: 24 August 2020
Moyn, S. (2012). The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, Mass
Nance, M and Cottrell, M. (2014). A turn toward experimentalism? Rethinking security and governance in the twenty-first century. Review of International Studies, 40(2): 277-301.
Neumayer E. (2005). Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6):925–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705281667.
OAS (Organization of American States) (2014) Promotion and protection of human rights in business. GA Res 2840 (XLIV-O/14)
OAS (Organization of American States) (2016) Promotion and protection of human rights. AG/RES.2887 (XLVI-O/16)
OECD (2017) National action plans on business and human rights to enable policy coherence for responsible business conduct. https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/NAP-to-enable-policy-coherence-for-RBC.pdf Accessed: 24 August 2020
Panke, D. , & Haubrich Seco, M. (2016) “EU and supranational governance” In: Jacob Torfing & Chris Ansell (Ed) Handbook on Theories of Governance, p.499–51. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
PeaceWomen (2020), https://www.peacewomen.org/member-states Accessed 24 August 2020
Posner, E. (2014). The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.
Ruggie, J. (2002) The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5: 27-36.
Ruggie, J. (2013) Just business: multinational corporations and human rights. W.W. Norton & Co.
Ruggie, J. (2014) Global governance and "new governance theory": lessons from business and human hights. Global Governance, 20(1): 5-17.
Ruggie, J. (2020) The social construction of the UN Guiding Principles on Busines and Human Rights. In: S. Deva, & D. Birchall (eds) Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business. Edward Elgar, Massachusetts, p.63-88.
Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2008) Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3): 271-327
Sabel, C., F. & Simon W. H. (2011). Minimalism and experimentalism in the administrative State. Geo LJ, 100(1), 53–94.
Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2012) Experimentalist Governance. In: D. Levi-Faur (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press, pp.169–184.
Schaffer, K., J. (2012). Deliberative democracy in transnational governance: problems of legitimacy, agency, and representation (August 14, 2012). Available at SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189357.
Soh, C., & Nam, S. (2018). Business and Human Rights Case Study of Korean Companies Operating Overseas: Challenges and a New National Action Plan. Human Rights Quarterly 40(2), 287-316
Teubner, G. (1983). Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and Society Review, 17: 239.
Teubner, G. (1997), Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in World Society. In: G. Teubner (ed) Global Law without a State, pp. 3–31. Aldershot.
Tuangratananon, T. Sangay Wangmo, S., Widanapathirana, N., Pongutta, S., Viriyathorn, S., Patcharanarumol, W., Thin, K., Nagpal, S., Nuevo, C. E. L., Padmawati, R. S., Puyat-Murga, M. E., Trisnantoro, L., Wangmo, K., Wellappuli, N., Hoang Thi, P., Khuong Anh, T., Zangmo, T., & Tangcharoensathien, V. (2019) National action plans on non-communicable diseases Implementation of national action plans on noncommunicable diseases, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(2): 73-168.
UN Human Rights Council (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework A/HRC/17/31 https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf. Accessed: 24 Aug 2020
UN Human Rights Council (2008) Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises: Protect, Respect, Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. UN Doc A/HRC/8/5 https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G08/128/61/PDF/G0812861.pdf?OpenElement Accessed: 24 August 2020
UN Human Rights Council (2012) Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. UN Doc A/HRC/20/29 https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/A.HRC.20.29_en.pdf. Accessed: 24 Aug 2020
UN Human Rights Council (2014) Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. UN Doc A/HRC/RES/26/22. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/083/82/PDF/G1408382.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed: 20 August 2020
UN OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) (1993) Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/vienna.pdf. Accessed: 24 August 2020
UN OHCHR (n.d.) 1st UN Pacific Forum on Business and Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2020UN-pacific-forum.aspx. Accessed: 2 December 2020.
UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights (2012) Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, A/HRC/20/29 (10 April 2012).
UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights (2014) Guidance on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/UNWG_%20NAPGuidance.pdf Accessed: 24 August 2020
UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights (2016) Guidance on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/NationalActionPlans.aspx. Accessed: 24 August 2020
Wolfsteller, R. (2020) Out of sync: The failed translation of international human rights in the creation of the UK Human Rights Act, Journal of Human Rights, 19:3, 325-343
World Bank (1983) World Development Report. OUP, New York, cited by Chimhowu A, Hulme D, Munro L (2019) The ‘New’ national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships. World Development 120:76-89