Abstract
Globalization means that a few borders disappear all over the world, and this both encourages and increases physical mobility of goods and people around the globe. But, at the same time, the increased mobility puts a strain on a few other borders. Europe has recently faced an emergency situation related to the massive arrival of refugees across the Mediterranean. It has been suggested that the problem can be addressed by strengthening international cooperation for development with the countries of origin of refugees and, more generally, of irregular migrants. The underlying idea is that the development of countries of origin will reduce the migration flow. This proposal seems consistent with the slogan, launched by various populist parties, “Let’s help them at home.” However, it conceals some possible misunderstandings, which this article aims to analyze. Firstly, the most intense flows of irregular migrants currently come from countries that either are at war or oppressed by dictatorial regimes. Hence, it would not be realistic to start development processes in these countries, which first require complex actions that are studied to promote pacification. Secondly, it should be noted that, as a result of the so-called migration hump, the development of poor countries is generally associated with an increase and not a decrease in emigration. However, if helping the countries of emigration to develop and establishing partnerships with them does not reduce migration flows, it will improve the management of these very flows.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Source: Table 2.10.1, “Serie Storiche Istat”; http://seriestoriche.istat.it
470,884 Italian nationals moved abroad over the period 1991–2000. Source: Table 2.10.1, “Serie Storiche Istat”; http://seriestoriche.istat.it
The arrivals in Italy of irregular immigrants and refugees by sea were 181,490 in 2016. They dropped to 119,369 in 2017, and further diminished to 6295 in the first 3 months of 2018 (UNHCR 2018b)
Considering the repeated commitment made by the most industrialized countries to allocate official aid for development amounting to 0.7% of their GDP (UNDP 2005), Italian official aid to development in 2016, the last year regarding which there are consolidated data, was 0.27% of the GDP, versus 0.7% of the United Kingdom, 0.7% of Germany and 0.38% of France (http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/statisticsonresourceflowstodevelopingcountries.htm). Moreover, always referring to the year 2016, about one fourth of Italian official aid for development is actually intended to cover the costs incurred by hospitality services for refugees on Italian soil (openaid.esteri.it), with no contribution to the development of third party countries.
References
Ambrosini, M. (2010). Richiesti e respinti. L’immigrazione in Italia. Come e perché. Milano: il Saggiatore.
Ambrosini, M. (2018). Irregular Immigration in Southern Europe. Actors, Dynamics and Governance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity.
Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2004). Das kosmopolitische Europa. Gesellschaft un Politik in der Zweiten Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Bonciani, B. (2017). Rimesse dei migrant e processi di sviluppo. Quadro attuale, rischi e opportunità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Carling, J., & Talleraas, C. (2016). Root causes and drivers of migration. Implications for humanitarian efforts and development cooperation. Oslo: Peace research institute Oslo (PRIO).
Caselli, M. (2012). Transnationalism and co-development. Peruvian associations in Lombardy. Migration and Development, 1(2), 295–311.
Caselli, M. (2016). Migrazioni, sviluppo dei paesi terzi e politiche internazionali di cooperazione. Alcune riflessioni sul caso europeo e italiano. In Fondazione Ismu, Ventiduesimo Rapporto sulle migrazioni 2016 (pp. 201–211). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Caselli, M., & Gilardoni, G. (2018). Introduction: globalization between theories and daily life experiences. In M. Caselli & G. Gilardoni (Eds.), Globalization, supranational dynamics and local experiences (pp. 1–40). Cham: Plagrave Macmillan.
Cesareo, V. (2014). Twenty years of immigration in Italy. In V. Cesareo (Ed.), Twenty years of migrations in Italy: 1994–2014 (pp. 1–18). Milano: McGraw-Hill Education.
Clemens, M. A., & Postel, H. M. (2017). Temporary work visas as US-Haiti development cooperation: a preliminary impact evaluation. Iza Journal of Labor & Development, 6(4), 1–18.
Clemens, M. A., & Postel, H. M. (2018). Deterring emigration with foreign aid: an overview of evidence from low-income countries. CGD Policy Papers, 119, 1-28.
Clemens, M. A., Radelet, S., Bhavnani, R. R., & Bazzi, S. (2012). Counting chickens when they hatch: timing and the effects of aid on growth. Economic Journal, 122(561), 590–617.
Codini, E. (2014). The legal aspects. In V. Cesareo (Ed.), Twenty years of migrations in Italy: 1994–2014 (pp. 35–46). Milano: McGraw-Hill Education.
Czaika, M., & de Haas, H. (2012). The role of internal and international relative deprivation in global migration. Oxford Development Studies, 40(4), 423–442.
Dao, T. H., Docquier, F., Parsons, C. R., & Peri, G. (2016). Migration and development: dissecting the anatomy of the mobility transition. IZA Discussion Paper, 10272, 1–32.
David, A., & Senne, J. N. (2016). A descriptive analysis of immigration to and emigration from the EU: where does the EU stand within OECD? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, (184), 1–64.
De Haas, H. (2007). Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. Development and Change, 38(5), 819–841.
De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264.
De Haas, H. (2012). The migration and development pendulum: a critical view on research and policy. International Migration, 50(2), 8–25.
European Commission. (2015). A European agenda on migration. Brussels, COM(2015) 240 Final.
European Commission (2016). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council and the European Investment Bank on establishing a new Partnership Framework with third countries under the European Agenda on Migration. Brussels: COM(2016) 385 final.
Faist, T., & Fauser, M. (2011). The migration-development Nexus: toward a transnational perspective. In T. Faist, M. Fauser, & P. Kivisto (Eds.), The migration-development Nexus. A transnational perspective (pp. 1–26). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fondazione Ismu. (2018). Ventitreesimo Rapporto sulle migrazioni 2017. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Frank, R., & Hummer, R. A. (2002). The other side of the paradox: the risk of low birth weight among infants of migrant and nonmigrant households within Mexico. International Migration Review, 36(3), 746–765.
Fratzke, S., & Salant, B. (2018). Moving beyond “root causes”. The Complicated Relationship between Development and Migration. Towards a Global Compact for Migration: A Development Perspective. A Series to Inform the Debate, (2), 1–18.
Galbraith, J. K. (1979). The Nature of Mass Poverty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Geddes, A. (2005). Chronicle of a crisis foretold: the politics of irregular migration, human trafficking and people smuggling. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(3), 324–339.
Gibson, J., & McKenzie, D. (2014). The development impact of a best practice seasonal worker policy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(2), 229–243.
Glick Schiller, N., & Faist, T. (2009). Introduction: migration, development and social transformation. Social Analysis, 53(3), 1–13.
Greiner, F. (2017). Introduction: writing the contemporary history of European solidarity. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’Histoire, 24(6), 837–853.
Hugo, G. (2012). Migration and development in low-income countries: a role for destination countries policies? Migration and Development, 1(1), 24–49.
ISTAT (2016). Permessi di soggiorno per asilo politico e protezione umanitaria. Statistiche Report, 23 dicembre, 1–14.
Keijzer, N., Héraud, J., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (2016). Theory and practice? A comparative analysis of migration and development policies in eleven European countries and the European Commission. International Migration, 54(2), 69–81.
Lipton, M. (1980). Migration from rural areas of poor countries: the impact on rural productivity and income distribution. World Development, 8(1), 1–24.
Marini, F. (2015). Co-sviluppo e integrazione. Le associazioni ghanesi in Italia e nel Regno Unito. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Martell, L. (2007). The third wave in in globalization theory. International Studies Review, 9(2), 173–196.
Martin, P. L., & Taylor, J. E. (1996). The anatomy of a migration hump. In J. E. Taylor (Ed.), Development strategy, employment and migration: insights from models (pp. 43–62). Paris: OECD Development Centre.
Massey, D. S., & Riosmena, F. (2010). Undocumented migration from Latin America in an era of rising U.S. enforcement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630(1), 294–321.
Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. London: Allen Lane.
Newman, D. (2006). Borders and Bordering. Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171–186.
Nyberg-Sørensen, N., Van Hear, N., & Engberg-Pedersen, P. (2002). The migration-development Nexus evidence and policy option state-of-the-art overview. International Migration, 40(5), 3–47.
Oommen, T. K. (1989). India: ‘brain drain’ or the migration of talent? International Migration, 27(3), 411–425.
Orozco, M. (2013). Migrant remittances and development in the global economy. London: Lynne Rienner.
Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2009). Mobilising the Moroccans: policies and perceptions of transnational co-development engagement among Moroccan migrants in Catalonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(10), 1623–1641.
Portes, A., & Böröcz, J. (1989). Contemporary immigration: theoretical perspectives on its determinants and modes of incorporation. International Migration Review, 23(3), 606–630.
Qian, N. (2015). Making progress on foreign aid. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 277–308.
Rotte, R., & Vogler, M. (1998). Determinants of international migration: empirical evidence for migration from developing countries to Germany. IZA Discussion Paper, 12, 1–29.
Schain, M. A. (2009). The state strikes back: immigration policy in the European Union. The European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 93–109.
Skeldon, R. (2008). Migration and development. In Bangkok: United Nations expert meeting on international migration and development in Asia and the Pacific.
Spilimbergo, A. (2009). Democracy and foreign education. American Economic Review, 99(1), 528–543.
Stjernø, S. (2011). The idea of solidarity in Europe. European Journal of Social Law, 3, 156–176.
Tabar, P. (2009). Immigration and human development: evidence from Lebanon. Human Development Research Paper, 35, 1–41.
Telli, H. (2014). Less poverty, more emigration: understanding migrant flows from developing countries. Migration and Development, 3(1), 54–72.
UNDP (2005). Human Development Report 2005. International cooperation at a crossroads. Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP. (2009). Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming barriers. Human mobility and development. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
UNHCR (2016a). Refugees/migrants emergency response – Mediterranean, 1 August 2016. http://data.unhcr.org.
UNHCR (2016b), Refugees/migrants emergency response – Mediterranean, 31 December 2016, http://data.unhcr.org.
UNHCR (2018a). Mediterranean situation, 9 July 2018. http://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/mediterranean.
UNHCR (2018b). Desperate journeys. January 2017 – March 2018. UNHCR.
Vallet, E. (Ed.). (2014). Borders, fences and walls: state of insecurity? Burlington: Ashgate.
Yang, D. (2009). International migration and human development. Human Development Research Paper, 29, 1–39.
Zanfrini, L. (2016). Introduzione alla sociologia delle migrazioni. Roma: Laterza.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caselli, M. “Let Us Help Them at Home”: Policies and Misunderstandings on Migrant Flows Across the Mediterranean Border. Int. Migration & Integration 20, 983–993 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-00645-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-00645-w