Skip to main content
Log in

Skepticism and Cryptography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

Cryptography is an essential component of America’s national security infrastructure. Billions of dollars are spent on cryptosystems every year, in both the public and private sector. Unfortunately, the field is rife with dubious claims, snake oil salesmen, and outright fraud. This paper highlights the importance of skepticism and critical thinking in the role of evaluating and procuring cryptosystems. We discuss our experiences in teaching future leaders about testing extraordinary cryptographic claims by asking hard questions and show examples from our own experience. We believe that the rigorous application of skepticism and critical thinking in cryptography are absolutely essential to the wise use of America’s resources and the security of the nation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Letters near the end of the alphabet would “wrap around”: Y would encrypt to B, for example.

  2. One such capture was dramatized in the 2000 film “U-571”.

  3. Our use of ten is merely an accident of biology. Knowing that you can count on your fellow humans to have two appendages with five fingers each makes for a convenient system we can all rely on. It is no coincidence that another word for ‘finger’ is ‘digit’.

  4. There is, as of this writing, no such company as SnakeOilCipher.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Mike Collins, a National Security Agency mathematician and a visiting professor of computer science at USAFA. We also note the contributions of Bruce Schneier’s essay in (Schneier 1999), the founding document connecting skepticism and cryptography, along with Phil Zimmerman’s 1997-updated essay on cryptography and snake oil (Zimmerman 1991). These works should be required reading for critical thinkers everywhere.

The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US government, the Department of Defense, or the United States Air Force Academy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry S. Fagin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagin, B.S., Baird, L.C., Humphries, J.W. et al. Skepticism and Cryptography. Know Techn Pol 20, 231–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9030-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9030-8

Keywords

Navigation