Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spherical FAIMS: comparison of curved electrode geometries

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Abstract

High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) can operate at atmospheric pressure to separate gas-phase ions on the basis of a difference in the mobility of an ion at high fields relative to its mobility at low field strengths. Several novel cell geometries have been proposed in addition to the commercially available planar and cylindrical designs. Nevertheless, there is still much to explore about three-dimensional (3-D) curved cell geometries (spherical and hemispherical) and comparison to two-dimensional (2-D) curved geometries (cylindrical). The geometry of a FAIMS cell is one of the essential features affecting the transmission, resolution, and resolving power of FAIMS. Electric fields in a spherical design allow advantages such as virtual potential wells that can induce atmospheric-pressure near-trapping conditions and help reduce ion losses. Curvature of electrodes enables the ions to remain focused near the gap median, which help to improve sensitivity and ion trapping at higher pressures. Here we detail the design and characterization of a novel FAIMS cell having spherical electrode geometry and compare it to hemispherical and cylindrical cells. These FAIMS cells were interfaced with a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer in this study. Several structural classes of common explosives were employed to evaluate the separation power of these geometries. FAIMS spectra were generated by scanning the compensation voltage (CV) while operating the mass spectrometer in total ion mode. The identification of ions was accomplished through mass spectra acquired at fixed values of CVs. The performance of FAIMS using cylindrical, hemispherical, and spherical cells was compared and trends identified. For all trials, the best transmission was obtained by the spherical FAIMS cell while hemispherical FAIMS provided the best resolution and resolving power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett DA, Belford M, Dunyach JJ, Purves RW (2007) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18:1653–1663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant JG, Prieto M, Prox TA, Yost RA (2010) Int J Mass Spectrom 298(1–3):41–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carnahan BL, Tarassov AS (1995). U.S. Patent No. 5,420,424. Pittsburgh, PA: US

  4. Eiceman GA, Karpas Z (2005) Ion mobility spectrometry. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Guevremont R, Purves RW (1999) Rev Sci Instrum 70:1370–1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guevremont R, Purves RW, Barnett DA, Ding LY (1999) Int J Mass Spectrom 193(1):45–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guevremont R, Barnett DA, Purves RW, Viehland LA (2001) J Chem Phys 114(23):10270–10277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guevremont R, Ding LY, Ells B, Barnett DA, Purves RW (2001) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 12(12):1320–1330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guevremont R, Purves RW, Barnett DA (2003). U.S. Patent No. 6,713,758. Ottawa, CA: US

  10. Guevremont R (2004) J Chromatogr 1058(1–2):3–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krylov EV (1999) Tech Phys 44:113–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Prox T, Prieto M, Bryant J, Yost RA (2008) U.S. Patent App. No. 20100044557. Gainesville, FL: US

  13. Purves RW, Guevremont R, Day S, Pipich CW, Matyjaszczyk M (1998) Rev Sci Instrum 69:4094–4105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siems WF, Wu C, Tarver EE, Hill HH, Larsen PR, McMinn DG (1994) Anal Chem 66:4195–4201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shvartsburg AA, Li F, Tang K, Smith RD (2006) Anal Chem 78:3706–3714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shvartsburg AA, Smith RD (2007) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18:1672–1681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shvartsburg AA, Tang K, Smith RD (2004) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 15(10):1487–1498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shvartsburg AA, Tang K, Smith RD (2005) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 16(1):2–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Song QY, Kothari S, Senko MA, Schwartz JC, Amy JW, Stafford GC, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z (2006) Anal Chem 78(3):718–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Viehland LA, Guevremont R, Purves RW, Barnett DA (2000) Int J Mass Spectrom 197:123–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate. The authors would like to thank Dr. Jennifer Bryant and Mr. Todd Prox for their assistance in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, PO Box 117200, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Marilyn Prieto & Richard A. Yost

Authors
  1. Marilyn Prieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard A. Yost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Yost.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prieto, M., Yost, R.A. Spherical FAIMS: comparison of curved electrode geometries. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 14, 61–69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-011-0073-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-011-0073-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation