Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Measures for the U.S. Hospice System

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic research analyzing hospice quality and performance is limited. The purpose of this exploratory study is to investigate potential measurements to address quality within the U.S. hospice system. We endeavor to use Medicare Hospice Cost Report data for 2000 through 2007 to operationalize three constructs of quality—operational, labor, and clinical. These constructs are an attempt to answer the call for quality measures that focus on the following areas: (1) how the organization is functioning, (2) how the workforce is improving, and (3) how to measure changes in the patient’s condition. We examine these hospice quality measures in both nonprofit (NP) and for-profit (FP) hospice providers. Our sample includes 7,039 observations for the investigation period. Our results indicate that hospice quality significantly improves for our sample. These findings also hold when separately examining for-profit and nonprofit hospice providers. To our knowledge, research has not fully explored potential measures of hospice quality. Our exploratory study is an attempt to bridge dialogue between research and practice to further the discussion of quality in hospice care. Quality is a difficult concept to measure when referring to hospice care especially since the patients are terminally ill and are expected to die. Quality care consists of keeping the patient comfortable as he/she goes through the dying process. For this reason typically quality standards are not applicable, and our findings assist in the development of performance-related hospice quality measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Information available at: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/011910.html

  2. MedPac is an independent Congressional agency established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 to advise the US Congress on issues affecting the Medicare Program (MedPac 2008).

  3. See Form CMS-1984–99 Instructions and Provider Reimbursement Manual, available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Manuals/PBM/itemdetail.asp?filterType=none&filterByDID=-99&sortByDID=1&sortOrder=ascending&itemID=CMS021935

References

  • Carlson, M. D., Gallo, W. T., & Bradley, E. H. (2004). Ownership status and patterns of care in hospice: results from the national home and hospice care survey. Medical Care, 42, 432–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). (2008). 42 CFR Part 418 - Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Hospice Conditions of Participation; Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 109 (June 5, 2008). Available from: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1305.pdf.

  • Conner, S. R. (2007). Development of hospice and palliative care in the United States. Omega - Journal of Death and Dying, 56(1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, S. R. (2009). U.S. hospice benefits. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 38(1), 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2006). Nurturing hope at the end of life. Ageing International, 31(3), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huskamp, H. A., Newhouse, J. P., Norcini, J. C., & Keating, N. L. (2008). Variation in patients’ hospice costs. Inquiry, 45, 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, N. M., & Magnus, S. A. (2001). The Medicare cost report and the limits of hospital accountability: improving financial accounting data. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 26(1), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L., Wales, J., & Bernstein, L. (1984). A randomized controlled trial of hospice care. Lancet, 1, 890–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. A., Ettner, S. L., Rosenfeld, K. E., Carlisle, D. M., Leake, B., & Asch, S. M. (2002). Cash and compassion: profit status and the delivery of hospice services. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5(4), 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCue, M. J., & Thompson, J. M. (2005). Operational and financial performance of publicly traded hospice companies. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(6), 1196–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac). (2008). Report to the congress: Reforming the delivery system. Washington: MedPac. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun08_EntireReport.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac). (2009). Report to Congress Medicare Payment Policy. Washington, DC: MedPAC. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar09_EntireReport.pdf.

  • Miller, S. C., Intrator, O., & Burdzovic Andreas, J. (2003). Factors associated with hospice utilization. Report for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ-2005–27. Rockville: AHRQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R. S., Maroney-Galin, C., Kravlovec, P. D., & Meier, D. E. (2005). The growth of palliative care programs in United States hospitals. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(6), 1127–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO). (2006). NHPCO Quality Partners – an Introduction. Alexandria: NHPCO. Available at: http://www.nhpco.org/files/public/quality/quality_introbrochure.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO). (2008). NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America. Alexandria: NHPCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S. M., Phil, M., Ettner, S. L., & Lorenz, K. (2008). Paying the price at the end of life: a consideration of factors that affect the profitability of hospice. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11(7), 1002–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasman, H. R. W., Brandt, H. E., Deliens, L., & Francke, A. L. (2009). Quality indicators for palliative care: a systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 38(1), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, S., Bernard, M., Dixon, S., McAuley, W., Loving, G., & McClanahan, L. (2002). Obstacles to palliation and end-of-life care in a long-term care facility. The Gerontologist, 42(3), 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Gunten. (2008). Profit or not-for-profit: who cares? Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11(7), 954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela C. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noe, K., Smith, P.C. Quality Measures for the U.S. Hospice System. Ageing Int 37, 165–180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9100-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9100-1

Keywords

Navigation