Skip to main content
Log in

The Embodied Dimension of Imagination. Expanding the Loop Model

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the sociocultural embeddedness of imagination received the researchers’ attention over the last years, less research was dedicated to the embodied dimension of imaginary processes. Nevertheless, any person engaged in imagination is always also a body. Moreover, there is no clear limit between imagination in thought, and in exploratory external actions. The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the theorization of the embodied dimension of imagination, by drawing on Zittoun, Cerchia and Gillespie’s imaginary loop model. We discuss the notion of here-and-now reality entailed in this model with the help of Schuetz’ notion of provinces of meaning and argue that this definition of the here-and-now allows to use the loop model for the analysis of activities in which the body movements occupy a central place. This argument is sustained by the example of an analysis of aikido practice. This analysis leads us to propose to complete the imaginary loop model with a forth dimension representing the degree of embodiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We keep the original formulation (see James 1890, p. 292), which is singular, although the plural form seems us more accurate.

  2. Elsewhere, we have called “distal spheres of experience” these worlds generated, or explored, through imagination (Zittoun and Gillespie 2016).

  3. Data was collected as part of the first author’s Master dissertation in 2014 (see Gfeller 2015).

  4. This identification was possible as the first author is an advanced aikido practitioner and instructor.

  5. We use the word “technique” in this text in order to refer to a standard series of movement that starts when the partner attacks and ends when the partner is either immobilized or projected. It refers to the Japanese word “waza” (技).

  6. Such combination of observation, participant observation, and self-confrontation interviews thus enables to document a higher psychological function such as imagination (Zittoun 2016).

References

  • Awad, S. H. (2017). “We are not free, admit it… But we cling onto tomorrow”. Imagination as a tool for coping in disempowering situations. In B. Wagoner, I. Brescó de Luna, & S. H. Awad (Eds.), The psychology of imagination (pp. 267–281). Information Age Publishing.

  • Brown, S. D., Cromby, J., Harper, D. J., Johnson, K., & Reavey, P. (2011). Researching “experience”: Embodiment, methodology, process. Theory & Psychology, 21(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310377543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). Précis of the rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5–6), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: Une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Pistes, 2(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clot, Y. (2009). Clinic of activity: The dialogue as instrument. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 286–302). Cambridge Univerity Press.

  • Crapanzano, V. (2004). Imaginative Horizons: An essay in literary-philosophical anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Gfeller, F. (2015). Explorer des réalités et créer des possibilités. La pratique de l’aïkido considérée sous l’angle de la psychologie socio-culturelle: Créativité, imagination et corps. Dossiers de psychologie (72)..

  • Gfeller, F. (2017). Imagination as embodied activity? Combining Zittoun’s imaginary loop with Schuetz’s provinces of meaning. In G. Sullivan, J. Cresswell, B. Ellis, M. Morgan, & E. Schraube (Eds.), Resistance and renewal in theoretical psychology (pp. 136–144). Captus Press Inc.

  • Gillespie, A., Baerveldt, C., Costall, A., Cresswell, J., de Saint-Laurent, C., Glăveanu, V. P., Jovchelovitch, S., Sawyer, K., Tanggaard, L., Valsiner, J., Wagoner, B., & Zittoun, T. (2015). Discussing creativity from a cultural psychological perspective. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. 125–141). Routledge.

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking through creativity and culture. Toward an integrated model. Transaction Publisher.

  • Hale, B. D. (1994). Imagery perspectives and learning in sports performance. In A. A. Sheikh & E. R. Korn (Eds.), Imagery in Sports and Physical Performance (pp. 75–90). Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Blackwell.

  • Hawlina, H., Pedersen, O. C., & Zittoun, T. (2020). Imagination and social movements. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilppö, J. A., Rajala, A., Zittoun, T., Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2017). Interactive dynamics of imagination in a science classroom. Front Learning Research, 4(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i4.213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hviid, P., & Villadsen, J. W. (2018). Playing and Being – imagination in the life course. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), Handbook of culture and imagination (pp. 137–166). Oxford University Press.

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology: Vol. II. Dover publications.

  • Jovchelovitch, S., Priego-Hernández, J., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Imagination in children entering culture. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and culture. Oxford University Press.

  • Joy, A., Sherry Jr, J. F., Mick, D. G., & Arnould, E. J. (2003). Speaking of art as embodied imagination : A multisensory approach to understanding aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 259–282.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

  • Moran, A., & Toner, J. (2017). Using imagination in sport. Mental imagery, motor imagery and mental practice in athletes. In A. Moran & J. Toner, A critical introduction to sport psychology (Third edition, original: 2004, pp. 234–270). Routledge.

  • Schuetz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenogical Research, 5(4), 553–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. (2000). Imagination. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 227–230). Oxford University Press.

  • Spencer, H. (2001). Hanna’s Diary, 1938–1941. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

  • Taylor, M. (2013). Imagination. The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199958450.013.0028.

  • Tisseron, S. (2005). La réalité de l’expérience de fiction. L’homme, 3(175–176), 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2011). Constructing the vanishing present between the future and the past. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037011795377601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage Publications Ltd.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978a). Internalization of higher psychological functions. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 1930–1935). Original: pp. 52–57). Harvard University Press.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978b). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 1930–1935). Original: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1991). Imagination and creativity of the adolescent [Original: 1931]. Soviet Psychology, 29, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood [Original: 1930]. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (2011). L’imagination et son développement chez l’enfant. In Leçons de psychologie (Original: 1930, pp. 155–180). La Dispute.

  • Zittoun, T. (2013). Three dimensions of dialogical movement. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T., & Cerchia, F. (2013). Imagination as expansion of experience. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9234-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T., & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2015). Life-Creativity: Imagining one’s life. In Vlad P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology (pp. 58–75). Routledge.

  • Zittoun, T. (2016). Studying “higher mental functions”: The example of imagination. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto (Vol. 13, pp. 129–147). Springer.

  • Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2016). Imagination in human and cultural development. Routledge.

  • Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2018). Imagining the collective future: A sociocultural perspective. In C. de Saint-Laurent, S. Obradovic, & K. Carrière (Eds.), Imagining collective futures: Perspectives from social, cultural and political psychology (pp. 15–37). Palgrave.

  • Zittoun, T., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Imagination at the frontiers of cultural psychology. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the comments on a first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabienne Gfeller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No competing interests exist.

Ethical Approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Swiss Psychological Association and of the Federation Suisse des Psychologues.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gfeller, F., Zittoun, T. The Embodied Dimension of Imagination. Expanding the Loop Model. Integr. psych. behav. 55, 73–88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09550-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09550-3

Keywords

Navigation